ethics

PUBLICATION ETHICS

Jurnal Info Sains : Informatika dan Sains (JIS) Adopt publication ethics from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Details of international guidelines and standards can be found on cope's website   and uphold publication ethics and are ready to conduct legal review if necessary. The Journal guarantees that relevant parties such as printing and advertising or sponsorship will not influence the editor in making decisions. The editorial board allows authors to communicate with journal pernerbits and other authors for connection purposes in publications.

Author

  1. Reporting Standards: Authors should present accurate reports and data from research results. The research article should contain sufficient detailed information and references. Fraud of the content of a manuscript is intentionally unethical and unacceptable behavior.
  2. Originality and Plagiarism: Authors must ensure the originality of their work and provide clear information/sources if using citations. Authors are not allowed to publish their research manuscripts in more than one journal because submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal simultaneously is unethical and unacceptable behavior.
  3. Acknowledgement of Sources: Proper recognition of the work of others should always be included. The author should cite publications that have been used to underlie the creation of a scientific work.
  4. Authorship of the Paper: Written work should be limited to researchers who have made significant contributions to the conception, design, implementation, or interpretation of reported research. All researchers who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Researchers who participate in substantive aspects of a study must be recognized or registered as contributors. The lead author must ensure that the co-author is indeed eligible for inclusion on the research list and all authors must see and approve the final version of the manuscript to be published.
  5. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: Each author must disclose in their manuscript any substantive finances or interests that may be interpreted to influence the outcome of a manuscript.
  6. Fundamental errors in published works: If the author finds errors or inaccuracies in the published manuscript, the author is expected to notify the editor of the journal or publisher and work with the editor to retract or correct the manuscript.

Editor

  1. Publication decisions: The editors are responsible for deciding which articles have been accepted by the editorial board to be published. Editors may refer to the policies of the editorial board of the journal and are limited by applicable legal provisions regarding defamation, copyright infringement and plagiarism. Editors can also consult with other editors or reviewers in making decisions.
  2. Fair Play: Editors can at any time evaluate the contents of the manuscript regardless of the race, gender, sexual orientation, religion, ethnicity, nationality, or political philosophy of the author.
  3. Confidentiality: Editors and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about the manuscript submitted to parties other than the author, reviewer, potential reviewer, editorial advisor and publisher.
  4. Disclosure and conflicts of interest: Material on manuscripts submitted and not published into journals, should not be used in the research of editors, without the written consent of the author

Riviewer

  1. Contribution to Editorial Decisions: Reviewers assist editors in making editorial decisions and through editorial communication with authors, can help authors improve manuscripts. Reviewers are also expected to provide remedial advice to the results of the review.
  2. Promptness: Any reviewer who feels unqualified to review research reported in a manuscript or conduct a prompt review of the manuscript, should notify the editor and not be involved in the review process. The invited reviewer must also confirm his/her willingness/unwillingness to review the article.
  3. Confidentiality: Any manuscript received for review should be treated as a confidential document. Such manuscripts should not be displayed or discussed with other parties unless they have permission from the editor.
  4. Standards of Objectivity: Boxing must be done objectively. Writers are not allowed to criticize personally. Reviewers should provide clear information about the results of the review along with supporting arguments.
  5. Acknowledgement of Sources: Reviewers should identify works that have been published that are relevant and that have not been cited by the author. Statements about previously reported observations, derivations or arguments should be accompanied by relevant citations. Reviewers should also coordinate with the editor about the substantial similarities between the manuscript being considered and other articles that have been published through the editor's knowledge and reviewers.
  6. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest: Information or ideas obtained from reviewers' partners should be kept confidential and not used for personal gain. Reviewers are not allowed to consider a manuscript caused by a conflict of interest, collaborative, or other interests with the author, company, or related institution.