THE INFLUENCE OF DEMOCRATIC LEADERSHIP STYLE, ORGANIZATIONAL COMMUNICATION, AND GAP GENERATION ON ACHIEVEMENT OF COMPANY PERFORMANCE AT MINARAK BRANTAS GAS, INC.
Keywords:
Democratic Leadership Style, Organizational, Communication, Generational Gap, Company ProductivityAbstract
A well-suited leadership style that matches the culture of the company generates a significant impact on the company’s development. Other factors are organizational communication, both vertically to the leaders and the workers and horizontally to the fellow employees. The addition of generational gap among the member of the organization will enlarge the difference in human character and also thinking patterns. Based on those factors, a meticulous study has been conducted on one of the private companies in Indonesia. This study has been aimed to understand the relationship between democratic leadership style, organizational communication, generational gap, and company productivity by measuring theirs gas production from the year 2017 to 2021. This study used the method of interviews and questionnaires that were processed statistically to identify the relationships among the selected variables both partially and simultaneously. This study found that a democratic leadership style has a positive and significant to company productivity. This style of leadership has increased gas production year-over-year (YoY) by more than 60% in the year 2019. Although, the variables of organizational communication and generational gap resulted in insignificant to the company productivity. Simultaneously, those three variables accounted for the percentage of 15% of significant value to company productivity, with the percentage of 85% were influenced by other variables beyond this study.,
Downloads
References
Adiawaty, S. (2019). Tantangan Perusahaan Mengelola Perbedaan Generasi Karyawan. Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis, 22(3), 376–382.
Amir, M. T. (2018). Perilaku Organisasi. Kencana.
Aruna, M., & Anitha, J. (2015). Employee Retention Enablers: Generation Y Employees. SCMS Journal of Indian Management, July-Sep, 94–103.
Aswardi, Lubis, Y., & Lubis, S. (2019). Analisis Peranan Sumber Daya Manusia Dalam Pencapaian Kinerja Perusahaan pada PT . Perusahaan Perdagangan Indonesia (Persero) Regional Medan. Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Agribisnis, 1(1), 31–37.
Balda, J. B., & Mora, F. (2011). Adapting Leadership Theory and Practice for The Networked, Millennial Generation. Journal of Leadership Studies, 5(3), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/jls.20229
Busro, M. (2018). Teori-teori Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Prenadamedia Group.
Dunne, T. C., Aaron, J. R., McDowell, W. C., Urban, D. J., & Geho, P. R. (2016). The Impact of Leadership on Small Business Innovativeness. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 4876–4881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.046
Dwyer, R. J., & Azevedo, A. (2016). Preparing Leaders for The Multi-Generational Workforce. Journal of Enterprising Communities, 10(3), 281–305. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-08-2013-0025
Egri, C. P., & Ralston, D. A. (2004). Generation Cohorts and Personal Values: A Comparison of China and the United States. Organization Science, 15(2), 210–220. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1030.0048
Ekasari, L. D. (2017). Hubungan Karakter Kepemimpinan dengan Kinerja Pengusaha Kecil Makanan Olahan. Optima, 1(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.33366/opt.v1i1.494
Farina, I., & Turkel, G. (2015). Identifying the Needs of Gen Y by Exploring Their Value Systems: A Qualitative Study. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, 6(6), 290–296. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijtef.2015.6.6.484
Kurniawan, Y. F. (2018). Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan Demokrasi terhadap Kinerja di CV Anugerah Jaya. Agora, 6(2), 1–6. https://publication.petra.ac.id/index.php/manajemen-bisnis/article/view/7794/7002
Mattayang, B. (2019). Tipe Dan Gaya Kepemimpinan: Suatu Tinjauan Teoritis. Journal of Economic, Management and Accounting, 2(2), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.35914/jemma.v2i2.247
Nawawi, H., & Hadari, M. M. (2012). Kepemimpinan yang Efektif. Gadjah Mada University Press.
Northouse, P. (2018). Pengantar Kepemimpinan: Konsep dan Praktik.
Oussible, N., & Tinaztepe, C. (2022). The Effect of Democratic Leadership Style on Organizational Productivity by the mediating role of Employee performance in Turkey. International Journal of Recent Research in Commerce Economics and Management, 9(1), 6–16.
Parengkuan, E., & Tumewu, B. (2020). Generation Gap(less) Seni Menjalin Relasi Antar Generasi. PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Prajogo, D., Toy, J., Bhattacharya, A., Oke, A., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2018). The relationships between information management, process management and operational performance: Internal and external contexts. International Journal of Production Economics, 199(February), 95–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.02.019
Robbins, S. P., & Coulter, M. (2016). Manajemen (A. Maulana (ed.); 13th ed.). Erlangga.
Robert Walters. (2017). Generation Gaps? Mythbusting Assumptions About Age in the Workforce. https://www.robertwalters.co.nz/content/dam/robert-walters/country/new-zealand/files/whitepapers/generation-gaps-whitepaper.pdf
Schermerhorn, J. R. (2013). Management Learn Succeed.
Siswanto, R., & Hamid, D. (2017). Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan terhadap Kinerja Karyawan: Studi pada karyawan divisi Human Resources Management Compensation and Benefits PT Freeport Indonesia. Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis, 42(1), 189–198.
Sugiarto. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis. Andi.
Suryadi, E. (2010). Analisis Peranan Leadership dan Budaya Organisasi. Manajerial, 08, 1–9.
Towers Watson. (2013). Change and Communication ROI Study (CCROI) - The 10th Anniversary Report. https://www.towerswatson.com/en-US/Insights/IC-Types/Survey-Research-Results/2013/12/2013-2014-change-and-communication-roi-study
Yates, K. (2005). Internal Communication Efectiveness Enhances Bottom-line Results. Journal of Organizational Excellence, 24(4), 97–102. https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.20102
Yildiz, S., Baştürk, F., & Boz, İ. T. (2014). The Effect of Leadership and Innovativeness on Business Performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 150, 785–793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.064
