ANALYSING THE DYNAMICS OF HUMAN INNOVATION IN ADMINISTRATION
Keywords:
Dynamics, Human Capital, Innovation, AdministrationAbstract
Talking about innovation or novelty is certainly done through a process with stages based on standard operating procedures that have been set. What is meant by standard operating procedure here is a concept that describes or explains the work mechanism or work procedures carried out by humans through a process of cooperation between two or more humans so that the results achieved always display or find novelty. This research aims to explain the dynamics of human innovation in administration through language that is easy to understand. This research includes library research because this research is conducted to search, analyse, interpret and generalise from the facts of the results of thoughts and ideas written by innovation experts in administration. This research is descriptive qualitative with a secondary data analysis approach. The results of this research show that there are several novelties that humans must produce in administration, namely novelty in model or form, novelty in quality, and novelty in quantity. The results of this study can be used as a reference for anyone with an interest in discussing administrative topics. In addition, it can be a material for formal discussion in higher education.
Downloads
References
P. Diawati, A. M. A. Ausat, and J. Augustin, “Creativity: How to Develop an Entrepreneurial Attitude of Creativity,” Journal on Education, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 11116–11122, 2023, Accessed: Mar. 02, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://jonedu.org/index.php/joe/article/view/2036
A. M. A. Ausat, A. Widayani, I. Rachmawati, N. Latifah, and S. Suherlan, “The Effect of Intellectual Capital and Innovative Work Behavior on Business Performance,” Journal of Economics, Business, & Accountancy Ventura, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 363–378, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.14414/jebav.v24i3.2809.
Makmur and T. Rohana, Inovasi dan Kreativitas Manusia: dalam Administrasi dan Manajemen, vol. 1. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama, 2015. Accessed: Mar. 05, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://perpus.stialanmakassar.ac.id/index.php?p=show_detail&id=7546
F. Jannah, “Pendidikan Seumur Hdup dan Implikasinya,” Dinamika Ilmu, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2016.
S. S. Gadzali, “Determinants of Consumer Purchases in the Perspective of Business Psychology,” Apollo - Journal of Tourism and Business, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 23–28, 2023, doi: 10.58905/apollo.v1i1.9.
A. Saputra, D. Ilmi, W. Angelina, S. S. Gadzali, and A. M. A. Ausat, “PT Pos Indonesia Public Service Innovation in Maintaining Existence and Competitiveness in the Industrial Era 4.0 (Case Study of PT Pos Indonesia KC Subang),” Journal on Education, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 10302–10311, 2023, Accessed: Feb. 22, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://jonedu.org/index.php/joe/article/view/1926
H. Khootimah Az-zaakiyyah, F. Hidayat, A. M. A. Ausat, and S. Suherlan, “Islamic Rural Bank Employee Performance: Role of Motivation, Compensation, and Work Environment,” EkBis: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 44–58, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.14421/EKBIS.2022.6.1.1551.
M. Geissdoerfer, D. Vladimirova, and S. Evans, “Sustainable business model innovation: A review,” J Clean Prod, vol. 198, pp. 401–416, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.240.
A. M. A. Ausat, “The Application of Technology in the Age of Covid-19 and Its Effects on Performance,” Apollo - Journal of Tourism and Business, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 14–22, 2023, doi: 10.58905/apollo.v1i1.8.
Kraugusteeliana, E. Surjati, A. M. A. Ausat, S. A. Pramono, and H. K. Prabu, “A Literature Review on the Application of Technology During Covid-19 and Its Relationship to Performance,” International Journal Of Artificial Intelligence Research, vol. 6, no. 1.2, p. 1, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.29099/ijair.v6i1.2.765.
K. Klussman, N. Curtin, J. Langer, and A. L. Nichols, “The importance of awareness, acceptance, and alignment with the self: A framework for understanding self-connection,” Eur J Psychol, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 120–131, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.5964/ejop.3707.
H. K. Azzaakiyyah, “An Entrepreneur’s Character from Professor Musa Asy’arie’s Perspective,” Apollo - Journal of Tourism and Business, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 6–13, 2023, doi: 10.58905/apollo.v1i1.7.
A. D. Subagja, A. M. A. Ausat, and Suherlan, “The Role of Social Media Utilization and Innovativeness on SMEs Performance,” Jurnal IPTEK-KOM (Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi Komunikasi), vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 85–102, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.17933/iptekkom.24.2.2022.85-102.
K. Kamar, N. C. Lewaherilla, A. M. A. Ausat, K. Ukar, and S. S. Gadzali, “The Influence of Information Technology and Human Resource Management Capabilities on SMEs Performance,” International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, vol. 6, no. 1.2, p. 1, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.29099/ijair.v6i1.2.676.
A. Zen, R. Kusumastuti, D. Metris, S. S. Gadzali, and A. M. A. Ausat, “Implications of Entrepreneurship Education as a Field of Study for Advancing Research and Practice,” Journal on Education, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 11441–11453, 2023, doi: 10.31004/joe.v5i4.2091.
A. Sururi, “Innovation of Policy in Public Administration Perspective toward the realization of Good Public Policy Governance,” Spirit Publik, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 14–31, 2017.
Y. Kardiat, “Public Administrative Innovation,” PALLANGGA PRAJA, vol. 4, no. 2, 2022.
A. M. A. Ausat and S. Suherlan, “Obstacles and Solutions of MSMEs in Electronic Commerce during Covid-19 Pandemic: Evidence from Indonesia,” BASKARA: Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 11–19, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.54268/BASKARA.4.1.11-19.
M. Basri, Metodologi Penelitian Sejarah. Jakarta: Restu Agung, 2001.
H.-I. Liao, S.-L. Yeh, and S. Shimojo, “Novelty vs. Familiarity Principles in Preference Decisions: Task-Context of Past Experience Matters,” Front Psychol, vol. 2, pp. 1–8, 2011, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00043.
A. Kretser et al., “Scientific Integrity Principles and Best Practices: Recommendations from a Scientific Integrity Consortium,” Sci Eng Ethics, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 327–355, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s11948-019-00094-3.
T. Haven and R. van Woudenberg, “Explanations of Research Misconduct, and How They Hang Together,” Journal for General Philosophy of Science, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 543–561, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10838-021-09555-5.
R. Costanza et al., “Quality of life: An approach integrating opportunities, human needs, and subjective well-being,” Ecological Economics, vol. 61, no. 2–3, pp. 267–276, Mar. 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.02.023.
K. F. Ferine, A. M. A. Ausat, S. S. Gadzali, Marleni, and D. M. Sari, “The Impact of Social Media on Consumer Behavior,” Communnity Development Journal: Jurnal Pendidikan Masyarakat, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 843–847, 2023, doi: 10.31004/cdj.v4i1.12567.