GENERATION GAP CONFLICT AND ITS IMPACT ON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE
Keywords:
Generation gap, Conflict, Performance, Employee.Abstract
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate and explain the influence of the generation gap conflict between millennials and older employees on employee performance. The meeting of three or even four generations in one organization currently marks the generation gap. These distinctions cause generational conflicts. Long-term conflict will undoubtedly have an influence on performance. This study's demographic is people of working age with years of birth, specifically the baby boomers generation (1946-1964), generation X (1965-1980), generation Y or millennials (1981-1996), and generation Z (1997-2012), with up to 200 respondents. This study collected primary data via distributing questionnaires. Descriptive analytic techniques and multiple linear regression analysis were used to handle and analyze the data. According to the findings of this study, communication, opinions on work values or ethics, perspectives on rules and authority/hierarchy, and knowledge of technology all have an impact on employee performance.
Downloads
References
L. Reynolds, The Trust Effect: Creating the High Trust, High Performance Organization. London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing, 1997.
H. Hilman and M. Siam, “The influence of organizational structure and organization culture on the organizational performance of higher educational institutions: The moderating role of strategy communication,” Asian Soc. Sci., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 142–154, 2014, doi: 10.5539/ass.v10n13p142.
M. Hamid, S. Maheen, A. Cheem, and R. Yaseen, “Impact of human resource management on organizational performance,” J. Account. Mark., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2017, doi: 10.4172/2168-9601.1000213.
C. Feinman, “Generation Z: Managing Emergencies in a Post-Millenial World,” American Public University System, 2017.
M. A. S. A.-L. Suad, “Understanding the psychology of youths: Generation gap,” Int. J. Psychol. Couns., vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 46–58, 2019, doi: 10.5897/ijpc2019.0568.
A. Shakarami, K. Hajhashemi, and N. Caltabiano, “Compensation Still Matters: Language Learning Strategies in the Third Millennium ESL Learners,” Online Learn., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 235–250, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.24059/olj.v21i3.1055.
A. Sharon, “Understanding the Millennial Generation,” J. Financ. Serv. Prof., vol. 69, no. 6, pp. 11–14, 2015, [Online]. Available: http://eds.a.ebscohost.com.laureatech.idm.oclc.org/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=0a0336d0-b8da-410d-a5b3-7e42fa4cbe86@sessionmgr4004&vid=1&hid=4210.
K. R. Subramanian, “The Generation Gap and Employee Relationship,” Int. J. Eng. Manag. Res., vol. 7, no. December, pp. 59–67, 2017.
R. T. N. Jemima and E. Kusumadmo, “Identifying Strategies to Minimize Intergenerational Conflict in Workplace Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta,” Kinerja, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 67–75, 2019.
B. R. Hayes, “the Implications of Multigenerational Differences Within the Workforce,” pp. 9–30, 2013.
P. Elsa, G. C. F., and Y. M. M., “Management accounting systems: an organizational competitive performance perspective,” Benchmarking An Int. J., vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 1843–1874, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1108/BIJ-12-2019-0547.
D. Sulistiono, A. Hermawan, and A. Sukmawati, “The Effect of Empowerment and Employee Engagement on Job Satisfaction, Organizational Commitment and its Impact on Performance of PTPN V,” J. Manaj. Agribisnis, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 132–152, 2019.
A. Eliyana, S. Ma’arif, and M. Muzakki, “Job satisfaction and organizational commitment effect in the transormational leardership towards employee performance,” Eur. Res. Manag. Bus. Econ., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 144–150, 2019.
Irhamahayati, M. Hubeis, A. Hermawan, and S. Djohar, “Generational conflicts at the indonesian public sector workplace from the millennial’s perspective,” Polish J. Manag. Stud., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 151–161, 2018, doi: 10.17512/pjms.2018.18.2.12.
C. Bhayana, V. Gupta, and K. Sharda, “The Role of Shared Leadership in Managing Conflicts in Multigenerational Teams: A Research Framework,” Bus. Perspect. Res., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 252–268, 2021, doi: 10.1177/2278533720964928.