IMPLICATIONS OF MULTIPLE POSITIONS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ON GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: RISK AND SUSTAINABILITY PERSPECTIVES

Wahyu Purbo Santoso; Siti Nurhasanah; Pustika Ayuning Puri; Nita Sentia  Purba

Authors

Wahyu Purbo Santoso Universitas Siber Asia
Siti Nurhasanah Universitas Siber Asia
Pustika Ayuning Puri Universitas Siber Asia
Nita Sentia Purba Universitas Siber Asia

Keywords:

Multiple Positions, Board of Directors, Good Corporate Governance, Risk, Sustainability

Abstract

The Board of Directors has a key role in making strategic decisions and carrying out the oversight function within the company. However, the phenomenon of multiple positions, in which one individual holds several positions on the Board of Directors or other corporate boards, can cause a conflict of interest and affect the overall effectiveness of Good Corporate Governance. This study aims to investigate the implications of concurrent positions on the Board of Directors for Good Corporate Governance from a risk and sustainability perspective. This research uses a qualitative approach with descriptive methods. The results of the study show that the practice of holding multiple positions on the board of directors has negative implications for Good Corporate Governance (GCG), including the risk of conflict of interest, lack of transparency, and a decrease in the company's operational efficiency. This threatens accountability, transparency and independence in managing the company. To overcome this impact, companies need to separate positions, increase independent oversight, and increase transparency through clear reporting. Thus, the implementation of good and sustainable GCG can be guaranteed, and the company's reputation as an entity with responsibility and integrity can be strengthened.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Wahyu Purbo Santoso, Universitas Siber Asia

Siti Nurhasanah, Universitas Siber Asia

Pustika Ayuning Puri, Universitas Siber Asia

Nita Sentia Purba, Universitas Siber Asia

References

Abidin, Z., & Prabantarikso, R. M. (2021). Konsep dan penerapan GCG pada lembaga keuangan dan BUMN. Deepublish.

Davis, G. F. (1991). Agents without principles? The spread of the poison pill through the intercorporate network. Administrative science quarterly, 583-613.

Davis, G. F. (1996). The significance of board interlocks for corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 4(3), 154-159.

Deviacita, A. W., & Achmad, T. (2012). Analisis pengaruh mekanisme corporate governance terhadap financial distress (Doctoral dissertation, Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis).

Ellitan, L. (2002). Praktik-praktik pengelolaan sumber daya manusia dan keunggulan kompetitif berkelanjutan. Jurnal manajemen dan Kewirausahaan, 4(2), 65-76.

Fairchild, L., & Li, J. (2005). Director quality and firm performance. Financial Review, 40(2), 257-279.

Farida, D. N., & Kusumumaningtyas, M. (2017). Pengaruh dewan komisaris independen dan kepemilikan manajerial terhadap kualitas laba. Jurnal Stie Semarang (Edisi Elektronik), 9(1), 35-57.

Ferris, S. P., Jagannathan, M., & Pritchard, A. C. (2003). Too busy to mind the business? Monitoring by directors with multiple board appointments. The Journal of finance, 58(3), 1087-1111.

Hashim, H. A., & Rahman, M. S. A. (2011). Multiple board appointments: are directors effective?. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(17).

Haunschild, P. R. (1993). Interorganizational imitation: The impact of interlocks on corporate acquisition activity. Administrative science quarterly, 564-592.

Lee, Y. S., Rosenstein, S., & Wyatt, J. G. (1999). The value of financial outside directors on corporate boards. International Review of Economics & Finance, 8(4), 421-431.

Moleong, L. J. (2014). Metode penelitian kualitatif edisi revisi. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nibraska, Z. Z., & Faroja, N. A. (2023). Tinjauan Yuridis Rangkap Jabatan Dewan Komisaris BUMN guna Mewujudkan Good Corporate Governance dalam Tata Kelola BUMN. Dinamika Hukum, 24(1), 103-114.

Nurhasanah, S., Puri, P. A., & Wilis, R. A. (2021). Pengaruh Harga Minyak Dunia, Harga Emas Dunia, Tingkat Inflasi, Kurs Rupiah, Indeks Dow Jones Dan Indeks Shanghai Composite Terhadap Indeks Harga Saham Gabungan Yang Terdaftar Dibursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2015-2019. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, Ekonomi, & Akuntansi (MEA), 5(3), 2935-2949.

Samawati, P. (2018). Argumen hukum mengenai larangan jabatan rangkap komisaris dan direktur dalam sebuah perseroan terbatas. Simbur Cahaya, 24(3), 4851-4864.

Santoso, W. P. (2022). Analisis Pengaruh Corporate Governance Terhadap Value Creation (Studi Empiris Perusahaan Non Keuangan yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2015-2021). Jurnal Ilmu Siber (JIS), 1(3), 97-102.

Santoso, W., & Utama, C. A. (2021). The indirect impact of busy directors on the relationship of family structure and cash flow sensitivity of cash (Empirical research in Indonesia’s manufacturing sector 2013-2017). Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis, 12(1), 111-114.

Surjani P, R. (2002). Manajemen strategi dalam menghadapi era globalisasi. Unitas, 11(1), 20-36.

Wulandari, T., & Raharja, R. (2013). Analisis pengaruh political connection dan struktur kepemilikan terhadap kinerja perusahaan. Diponegoro Journal Of Accounting, 141-152.