INSTITUTIONAL MODELING IN TOURISM DEVELOPMENT IN CIBUNTU TOURISM VILLAGE, KUNINGAN: AN ACTOR ANALYSIS

Authors

  • Brantas Brantas NHI Bandung Tourism Polytechnic

Keywords:

Rural tourism, Tourism village, Stakeholders, Actor analysis

Abstract

The existence of parties who have an interest in a tourist destination is vital because of its function as a controller for the diversity and complexity of the tourism industry, including in tourist villages. Therefore, it is necessary to review how far stakeholder involvement is as a form of actualization of an institution in tourist destinations, especially rural tourism. This study uses a qualitative method that is adapted to the concept of descriptive research by collecting data from semi-structured interviews with several related parties. The results of the discussion and discussion indicate that from the case study in the Cibuntu Tourism Village, the implementation of tourism activities is centralized to stakeholders who are key players, namely the Cibuntu Village Government, Pokdarwis, and BUMDES which regulate all policies and programs. Meanwhile, other stakeholders are divided into subject categories, crowd and contest setters whose existence and functionality need to be maximized.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. M. Toirxonovna, U. T. Obloqulovich, and I. I. Tuychiev, “Institutional Framework for the Development of the Tourism Market,” Indones. J. Law Econ. Rev., vol. 8, pp. 10–21070, 2020.

L. Huang, “Role of local institutions in rural tourism development in dazhai community, Guilin, China,” 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202105.0249.v1.

C. Menard, Institutions, contracts and organizations. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2000.

M. S. Reed et al., “Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management,” J. Environ. Manage., vol. 90, no. 5, pp. 1933–1949, 2009, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001.

G. Rowe and L. J. Frewer, “Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation,” Sci. Technol. Hum. values, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 3–29, 2000, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/016224390002500101.

R. C. Ford, W. C. Peeper, and A. Gresock, “Friends to grow and foes to know: using a stakeholder matrix to identify management strategies for convention and visitors bureaus,” in Journal of Convention & Event Tourism, 2009, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 166–184, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15470140903127176.

G. Wall and A. Mathieson, Tourism: change, impacts, and opportunities. Pearson Education, 2006.

N. Hartley and C. Wood, “Public participation in environmental impact assessment—implementing the Aarhus Convention,” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 319–340, 2005, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2004.12.002.

C. Tosun, “Limits to community participation in the tourism development process in developing countries,” Tour. Manag., vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 613–633, 2000, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(00)00009-1.

N. Restrepo and S. Anton Clavé, “Exploring institutions’ perceived roles in regional tourism development: An institutional thickness approach,” J. Policy Res. Tour. Leis. Events, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 486–501, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/19407963.2021.1962891.

J. M. Anderies, “Understanding the dynamics of sustainable social-ecological systems: human behavior, institutions, and regulatory feedback networks,” Bull. Math. Biol., vol. 77, pp. 259–280, 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-014-0030-z.

I. W. Mertha, L. Y. Wiarti, and A. H. Suasapha, “Stakeholders: Peran dan kendala pelibatannya dalam pengembangan desa wisata di Bali,” J. Kepariwisataan, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 15–23, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.52352/jpar.v17i2.43.

M. Rigelský, B. Gavurova, L. Suhanyi, R. Bačík, and V. Ivankova, “The effect of institutional innovations on tourism spending in developed countries,” Entrep. Sustain. Issues, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 457, 2021, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2021.9.2(30).

A. Wanner and U. Pröbstl-Haider, “Barriers to stakeholder involvement in sustainable rural tourism development—Experiences from Southeast Europe,” Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 12, p. 3372, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123372.

R. F. Wibowo and D. Rostyaningsih, “Analisis Aktor Implementasi Dalam Kebijakan Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah Kota Semarang (Studi Kasus Di Kecamatan Gunungpati),” J. Public Policy Manag. Rev., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 17–32, 2016.

O. F. Sandy, “Analisis Peran Aktor dalam Implementasi Kebijakan Pembangunan Sanitasi di Kabupaten Probolinggo,” J. Ilm. Adm. Publik, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 415–422, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jiap.2020.006.03.10.

Downloads

Published

2023-11-04

How to Cite

Brantas, B. (2023). INSTITUTIONAL MODELING IN TOURISM DEVELOPMENT IN CIBUNTU TOURISM VILLAGE, KUNINGAN: AN ACTOR ANALYSIS. Jurnal Ekonomi, 12(04), 1314–1322. Retrieved from https://ejournal.seaninstitute.or.id/index.php/Ekonomi/article/view/2822