INFLUENCE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND AUDIT COMMITTEE ON PERFORMANCE FINANCE COMPANY

Fachrudin Fachrudin; Charvin Charvin

Authors

Fachrudin Fachrudin Program Studies Accountancy, Faculty Economy And Business, Universitas Batam
Charvin Charvin Program Studies Accountancy, Faculty Economy And Business, Universitas Batam

Keywords:

Board of directors, Board of commissioners, Audit committee, Company age, financial performance

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the magnitude of the influence of several characteristics of the size of the board of directors, the frequency of board commissioner meetings, and the competence of the audit committee on financial performance in construction companies in 2018–2022, with company age as a moderating variable. The theory of this research refers to agency theory and good corporate governance. This research is empirical, using data from audited financial reports on construction companies published in the period 2018–2022. Data analysis uses panel data regression analysis. Based on the results of panel data regression analysis with a significance level of 78% using the Eviews 12 application, This research uses ROE and Tobin's Q measurements to test the company's financial performance. The research results show that the size of the board of directors does not have a significant positive effect on financial performance based on ROE and Tobin's Q. Based on ROE, the frequency of board of commissioners meetings has a significant negative effect on financial performance, while based on Tobin's Q, the frequency of board of commissioners meetings has a significant positive effect on financial performance. Based on ROE and Tobin's Q, audit committee qualifications do not have a significant effect on financial performance. This research also shows that the size of the board of directors, the frequency of board of commissioners meetings, audit committee qualifications, and company age together or simultaneously influence financial performance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. Azis, U. Hartono, and M. SE, “Pengaruh Good Corporate Governance, Struktur Modal, dan Leverage Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan Pada Sektor Pertambangan Yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2011-2015,” J. Lmu Manaj., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 1–13, 2017.

H. A. Asna, “Pengaruh Dewan Komisaris Independen, Kepemilikan Manajerial, dan Kepemilikan Institusional Terhadap Kinerja Perusahaan Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur.” STIE Perbanas Surabaya, 2017.

I. P. Kristianti, “Analisis pengaruh struktur modal terhadap kinerja keuangan perusahaan,” J. Akunt. Dewantara, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 56–68, 2018.

Ratnasari, Titisari, and Suhendro, “Pengaruh Value Added Intellectual Capital, GCG, dan Struktur Kepemilikan Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan,” J. Econ. Econ. Educ. Vol, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 240–257, 2015.

N. Aisyiah, D. Darminto, and A. Husaini, “Pengukuran Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan Menggunakan Metode Rasio Keuangan Dan Metode Eva (Economic Value Added)(Studi Pada PT. Kalbe Farma Tbk Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2009-2011),” J. Adm. Bisnis, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 108–117, 2013.

S. Kasmir, Analisis laporan keuangan, Cetakan ke. PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2014.

N. Garcia-Torea, B. Fernandez-Feijoo, and M. de la Cuesta, “Board of director’s effectiveness and the stakeholder perspective of corporate governance: Do effective boards promote the interests of shareholders and stakeholders?,” BRQ Bus. Res. Q., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 246–260, 2016.

C. Loderer and U. R. S. Waelchli, “Corporate aging and takeover risk,” Rev. Financ., vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 2277–2315, 2015.

D. A. Nugroho, Pengantar Manajemen untuk Organisasi Bisnis, Publik dan Nirlaba. Universitas Brawijaya Press, 2017.

E. B. Caesario, Kinerja Emiten Properti Belum Pulih. 2018.

N. D. Putri and D. Kartin, “Saham properti & konstruksi berpotensi outperform,” kontan.co.id, 2017. https://investasi.kontan.co.id/news/saham-properti-konstruksi-berpotensi-outperform

B. Blumberg, D. Cooper, and P. Schindler, EBOOK: Business research methods. McGraw Hill, 2014.

P. Ghauri, K. Grønhaug, and R. Strange, Research methods in business studies. Cambridge University Press, 2020.

P. Sofyan, Metodologi penelitian keuangan dan bisnis[1] P. Sofyan, Metodologi penelitian keuangan dan bisnis. In Media, 2018. In Media, 2018.

A. Farida, “Pengaruh Penerapan Good Corporate Governance dan Pengungkapan Islamic Social Reporting Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Perbankan Syariah di Indonesia,” Malia J. Ekon. Islam, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 31–42, 2018.

L. P. A. Anjani and I. P. Yadnya, “Pengaruh good corporate governance terhadap profitabilitas pada perusahaan perbankan yang terdaftar di BEI,” E-Jurnal Manaj. Unud, vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 5911–5940, 2017.

M. Rumapea, “Pengaruh good corporate governance terhadap profitabilitas perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di bursa efek Indonesia periode 2013-2015,” Methosika J. Akunt. dan Keuang. Methodist, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 45–56, 2017.

S. K. Johl, S. Kaur, and B. J. Cooper, “Board characteristics and firm performance: Evidence from Malaysian public listed firms,” J. Econ. Bus. Manag., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 239–243, 2015.

A. Nabila and D. Daljono, “Pengaruh proporsi dewan komisaris independen, komite audit, dan reputasi auditor terhadap manajemen laba,” in Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 2013, pp. 99–108.

I. S. Martsila and W. Meiranto, “Pengaruh corporate governance terhadap kinerja keuangan perusahaan,” in Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 2013, pp. 209–222.

D. Istighfarin and N. G. P. Wirawati, “Pengaruh good corporate governance terhadap profitabilitas pada Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN),” E-Jurnal Akunt. Univ. Udayana, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 564–581, 2015.

M. Hamdani, “Good corporate governance (GCG) dalam perspektif agency theory,” Semnas Fekon, vol. 2016, pp. 279–283, 2016.

F. Amaliyah and E. Herwiyanti, “Pengaruh kepemilikan institusional, dewan komisaris independen, dan komite audit terhadap nilai perusahaan sektor pertambangan,” J. Akunt., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 187–200, 2019.