Reliability of risk profile as a basis for preparing work plans and budget in organizational performance
Keywords:
Risk Management, Plan Budget, Organizational PerformanceAbstract
This research aims to explore the optimization of risk management towards achieving organizational performance targets and determining the implementation process at PT. X. Researchers use a framework to identify risk optimization problems using Decision Matrix. The approach technique in this research uses a Fishbone Diagram by looking at the causes of a problem and condition. The data collection method is secondary through various literature and other documentary materials, while the primary method is implemented in conducting observations and interviews with related perpetrator objects. Various factors causing not yet optimal risk management include: 1). Human Factors (Man), 2. System Factors (System), 3. Measurement Factors (Measurement), 4. Method Factors (Method). Alternative solutions to solving problems include: providing feedback with a focus on implementing risk management. Then determine a problem solving method based on analysis of people, systems and tools that are representative. Decision making techniques are used as a basis for thinking in the decision making process, including: Decision Matrix Analysis, decision making based on the performance index "Bayes" method. The category of companies used as case studies is still limited to PT. X. The solution that can be proposed is to determine the risk-based integration flow model, the process of coordination and intensive discussion with related fields, review the description and pattern of compilation of risk profiles, compile a list of generic risk and formulate standardized documentation on the results of the review.
Downloads
References
Allison, Michael, (2005). Strategic Planning for Non-Profit Organizations. Jakarta: Indonesian Obor Foundation.
Alsaadi, N., & Norhayatizakuan, N. (2021). The Impact of Risk Management Practices on the Performance of Construction Projects. Studies of Applied Economics, 39(4).
Aven, T. (2016). Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation. European Journal of Operational Research, 253(1), 1-13.
Berg, H. P. (2010). Risk management: procedures, methods and experiences. Reliability: Theory & Applications, 5(2 (17)), 79-95.
Dawadi, S., Shrestha, S., & Giri, R. A. (2021). Mixed-methods research: A discussion on its types, challenges, and criticisms. Journal of Practical Studies in Education, 2(2), 25-36.
Fuertes, G., Alfaro, M., Vargas, M., Gutierrez, S., Ternero, R., & Sabattin, J. (2020). Conceptual framework for the strategic management: a literature review—descriptive. Journal of Engineering, 2020, 1-21.
Irham Wahyudi. (2017). The Role of Key Risk Indicators in Risk Management.
J.R. Raco, (2010), Qualitative Research Methods, Jakarta: PT Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.
Kelvin, K., Lim, N., Vincent, V., & Welwen, W. (2023). Effect of implementing business risk management in micro, small medium enterprise. Journal of Management Science (JMAS), 6(1), 58-63.
Moleong, Lexy J. (2004), Qualitative Research Methods, Bandung: PT. Rosdakarya Youth.
Regulations on the Board of Directors of the Guarantee Organizing Agency. (2020). Social Number 46 of 2017 concerning PT Integrated Risk Management Guidelines. (PT.X of Year 2014 No.270).
S.D.B. Mau, (2014), Scholarship Selection Decision Support System Using Bayes and Dempster Shafer's Theorem, Pekomnas Journal, Vol.17, No.1, April, Pages.23-32.
Strategic Plan PT.X 2014-2019 Directors Regulation Number 25 of 2018 concerning Strategic Planning PT.X
Susilo J. Leo and Victor Riwu Kaho (2018), ISO 31000 risk management: 2018, Jakarta: Grasindo.
Swain, J., & King, B. (2022). Using informal conversations in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21, 16094069221085056.
