Economic valuation of Taman Meragun indigenous territory Sekadau regency, West Kalimantan
Keywords:
Dayak, Economic, Taman Meragun Community, Territory, ValuationAbstract
A well-prepared abstract enables the reader to identify the basic The Indigenous Dayak Taman Meragun Community, located in the village of Meragun, West Kalimantan, possesses deep-rooted cultural traditions and a sustainable existence. The population of the Taman people totals 2,837 individuals living following ancestral cultural practices. This region reflects the ecosystem of the Bornean tropical rainforest, encompassing hills, lowlands, swamps, and rivers. The Indigenous Dayak Taman Meragun Community sustainably utilizes natural resources, engaging in agriculture, gardening, forestry, and fishing activities in the Taman and Entorap Rivers. However, the designation of the area as a Forest Area and the issuance of palm oil plantation permits jeopardize their access to these resources. These people lead lives deeply intertwined with the customs and laws passed down through generations. The customary forest serves as an economic resource and holds spiritual and ecological significance. Economic potential encompasses agriculture, fisheries, livestock, and forest products. Environmental protection is paramount in the utilization of these potentials. In the face of changing times and threats to their ancestral lands, the Indigenous Dayak Taman Meragun Community endeavours to preserve their cultural identity and practices. They strive for legal recognition of their customary territory while balancing economic needs and environmental preservation. This article delves into the profile of the Taman Meragun customary territory, the challenges it faces, and the efforts made to sustain cultural heritage and the Environment
Downloads
References
Abafita, J., Mitiku, F. and Ryang, K.K. (2013) ‘Korea’s Saemaul Undong (New Village Movement): A Model for Rural Development in Ethiopia?’, 한국국제농업개발학회지, 25(3), pp. 217–230.
Alshenqeeti, H. (2014) ‘Interviewing as a data collection method: A critical review’, English linguistics research, 3(1), pp. 39–45.
Asiama, K.O. et al. (2018) ‘Land valuation in support of responsible land consolidation on Ghana’s rural customary lands’, Survey review, 50(361), pp. 288–300.
Bai, H. and Li, N. (2023) ‘Exploring Green Economic Efficiency Trends in Dominant Chinese Urban Agglomerations: A Super-Efficient SBM Model Approach’, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, pp. 1–24.
Bataille, C.Y. et al. (2021) ‘Relational values provide common ground and expose multi‐level constraints to cross‐cultural wetland management’, People and Nature, 3(4), pp. 941–960.
Beazley, H. and Ennew, J. (2006) ‘Participatory methods and approaches: Tackling the two tyrannies’, Doing development research, pp. 189–199.
Ciesielska, M., Boström, K.W. and Öhlander, M. (2018) ‘Observation methods’, Qualitative Methodologies in Organization Studies: Volume II: Methods and Possibilities, pp. 33–52.
Desing, H. et al. (2020) ‘A circular economy within the planetary boundaries: Towards a resource-based, systemic approach’, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 155, p. 104673.
Du, M., Zhao, M. and Fu, Y. (2020) ‘Revisiting urban sustainability from access to jobs: Assessment of economic gain versus loss of social equity’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 85, p. 106456.
Fisher, A.C., Krutilla, J. V and Cicchetti, C.J. (2013) ‘The economics of environmental preservation: A theoretical and empirical analysis’, in Economics of Natural & Environmental Resources (Routledge Revivals). Routledge, pp. 463–477.
Lenzerini, F. (2011) ‘Intangible cultural heritage: The living culture of peoples’, European Journal of International Law, 22(1), pp. 101–120.
Masiun, S. and Tobing, L. (2023) ‘Valuasi Ekonomi Wilayah Adat Taman Sunsong Kabupaten Sekadau’, Jurnal Bisnis dan Kewirausahaan, 12(4), pp. 391–400.
Nijkamp, P. (2012) ‘Economic valuation of cultural heritage’, The economics of uniqueness: Investing in historic city cores and cultural heritage assets for sustainable development, 75, pp. 75–103.
Raihan, A. (2023) ‘A review on the integrative approach for economic valuation of forest ecosystem services’, Journal of Environmental Science and Economics, 2(3), pp. 1–18.
Rezekiah, A.A., Ruslan, M. and Kadir, S. (2022) ‘DIRECT ECONOMIC VALUE OF LAND USE BY THE MERATUS DAYAK COMMUNITY’.
Salima, R., Aprita, I.R. and Hidayat, F. (2020) ‘Analysis of land supporting capacity in development potential for ruminant in Bireuen District’, Serambi Journal of Agricultural Technology, 2(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.32672/sjat.v2i1.1903.
Saragih, B. and Sunito, S. (2001) ‘Lake Toba: Need for an integrated management system’, Lakes & Reservoirs: Research & Management, 6(3), pp. 247–251.
Setiawan, I.E. et al. (2021) ‘Evaluation of environmental and economic benefits of land reclamation in the Indonesian coal mining industry’, Resources, 10(6), p. 60.
Sharip, Z., Suratman, S. and Shaaban, A.J. (2016) ‘A national research and development blueprint for sustainable lake basin management in M alaysia’, Lakes & Reservoirs: Research & Management, 21(4), pp. 269–283.
Tuah, S.N. (2021) Persepsi Masyarakat Terhadap Program Bantuan Pemerintah. 1st edn. Edited by D. S. Tangerang: Penerbit Lembaga Literasi Dayak.
Williams, L. (2023) ‘From Indigenous philosophy in environmental education to Indigenous planetary futures: what would it take?’, Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 39(3), pp. 320–335.
Yu, Z., Golpira, H. and Khan, S.A.R. (2018) ‘The relationship between green supply chain performance, energy demand, economic growth and environmental sustainability: An empirical evidence from developed countries’, LogForum, 14(4), pp. 479–494.
