Analysis Of Non-Tax State Revenue Calculation: Case Study At Nizam Zachman Ocean Fishing Port Referring To PP 85/2021

Authors

  • Shantika Shantika Students of the Law Study Program Master Program of the Postgraduate Program of the Christian University of Indonesia
  • John Pieris Students of the Law Study Program Master Program of the Postgraduate Program of the Christian University of Indonesia
  • Diana Ria Winanti Napitupulu Lecturer of Law Study Program Master Program Postgraduate Program of Christian University of Indonesia

Keywords:

Non-tax, Fisheries, Nizam Zachman

Abstract

This study has the main objective to explore and analyze the method of calculating non-tax state revenues for Mooring and Hygiene at the Nizam Zachman Ocean Fishing Port, with reference to Government Regulation Number 85 of 2021. In addition, this study also aims to explore and analyze non-tax state revenue optimization strategies, with a special focus on efforts to minimize potential losses at the Nizam Zachman Ocean Fishing Port. The research method applied is sociological empirical legal research with legal, case, historical, comparative, and conceptual approaches. The results showed two aspects of conclusions, first, related to the calculation of Non-Tax State Revenue (PNBP) for Mooring and Cleanliness at the Nizam Zachman Ocean Fishing Port, which has followed the formula based on Government Regulation No. 85 of 2021. The value of mooring services varies according to the Gross Tonnage (GT) of the ship, and the calculation of cleanliness involves the GT factor of the ship and the number of days. Second, optimization of fisheries business requires improvement in calculation formulation, emphasis on operational governance to reduce potential losses, and the search for new levy opportunities by considering Fisheries Management Areas (WPP) as a representation of fishing areas and fish resource potential, as well as the Non-Fisheries Product Collection Tax State Revenue (PNBP PHP) policy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

H. Juhaya S. Praja, Legal Theory and Its Applications, Bandung, CV Pustaka Setia, 2014).

I.H. Hijmans, in Het recht der werkelijkheid, in Herlien Budiono, Principles of Balance for Indonesian Treaty Law-Treaty Law Based on Indonesian Wigati Principles, Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2015.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Legal Research, Revised Edition, Prenadamedia Group, Jakarta, 2014.

Sahya Anggara, State Administration Law, Bandung: Pustaka Setia, 2018.

Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Year 1945.

Government Regulation Number 85 of 2021 concerning Types and Rates of Non-Tax Types of State Revenues applicable to the Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries.

Regulation of the Minister of Marine Affairs and Fisheries Number 38 of 2021 concerning Requirements and Procedures for Imposing Tariffs on Types of Non-Tax State Revenues Applicable to the Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries Derived from the Utilization of Fisheries Natural Resources.

Regulation of the Minister of Marine Affairs and Fisheries Number 47/Permen-KP/2016 concerning the Utilization of Aquatic Protected Areas.

Permendag No. 13/2011 concerning Determination of Fish Benchmark Prices (HPI) for the Calculation of Fisheries Product Levies.

Cahya Palsari, "Introductory Study of Legal Science: The Purpose and Function of Legal Science as a Fundamental Basis in Passing Court Decisions", e-Journal of the Judicial Community of Ganesha University of Education, Legal Studies Program (Volume 4 Number 3 November 2021).

Fence M. Wantu, "Antinomy in Law Enforcement by Judges". Periodical Journal of Mimbar Hukum, Vol. 19 No. 3 October 2007, Faculty of Law, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, 2007.

Garnaut, R. and Clunies-Ross, A., 1975. Uncertainty, Risk Aversion and the Taxing of Natural Resource Projects, The Economic Journal, 85(338).

Kusdiantoro, et al., "Performance of Capture Fisheries Development in Indonesia", Scientific Bulletin "MARINA," Socio-Economic Marine and Fisheries, Vol. 5 No. 2 Year 2019.

Maria S.W. Sumardjono, "Legal Certainty in Land Registration and Its Benefits for Banking and Property Business, "Paper delivered in a seminar on new policies in the field of land, impacts and opportunities for property and banking business", Jakarta, August 6, 1997.

Moh. Mahfud MD, Law Enforcement and Good Governance, Material at the National Seminar "Time for Conscience to Speak" organized by DPP Partai HANURA, Constitutional Court, Jakarta, January 8, 2009.

Nur Agus Susanto, Axiological Dimensions of the "ST" Case Decision Review Decision Number 97 PK / Pid.Sus / 2012, Judicial Journal Vol. 7 No. 3 December 2014.

Rusmilyansari, "Institution of Capture Fisheries Resource Management Based on Conflict Resolution in South Kalimantan", Marine Fisheries, Vol. 2, No. 2, November 2011.

Samudra Putra Indratanto, Nurainun, and Kristoforus Laga Kleden, "The Principle of Legal Certainty in the Implementation of Constitutional Court Decisions in the Form of State Institution Regulations and Government Regulations in Lieu of Law," Journal of Legal Sciences, No. 1 (2020).

Grimsrud, Kristine; Lindholt, Lars; Greaker, Mads. “Resource Rent in Norwegian Fisher¬ies-Trends and policies”. Working Paper 01/2017. The CREE Centre and The Research Council of Norway, University of Oslo, 2017.

Grimsrud K., Lindholt L. and Greaker M. 2017. Resource Rent in Norwegian Fisheries - Trends and policies. Working Paper 01/2017. The CREE Centre acknowledges financial support from The Research Council of Norway, University of Oslo and user partners. ISBN: 978-82-7988-239-8. ISSN: 1892-9680. http://www.cree.uio.no

Samudera Nizam Zachman Fishing Port Jakarta Directorate General of Capture Fisheries, "History of Fishing Ports", https://kkp.go.id/djpt/ppsnzj/page/1044-sejarah-pelabuhan-perikanan, accessed April 4, 2023.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-26

How to Cite

Shantika, S., John Pieris, & Diana Ria Winanti Napitupulu. (2024). Analysis Of Non-Tax State Revenue Calculation: Case Study At Nizam Zachman Ocean Fishing Port Referring To PP 85/2021. Jurnal Ekonomi, 13(02), 458–465. Retrieved from https://ejournal.seaninstitute.or.id/index.php/Ekonomi/article/view/4410