The Influence Of Work Flexibility, Self-Efficacy, And Job Satisfaction On Employees Work Engagement PT. XXX

Yohana Sarah Margareth Br Simanjuntak; Prihatin Lumbanraja; Abdul Rahim Matondang

Authors

Yohana Sarah Margareth Br Simanjuntak Universitas Sumatera Utara
Prihatin Lumbanraja Universitas Sumatera Utara
Abdul Rahim Matondang Universitas Sumatera Utara

Keywords:

Work Flexibility, Self-Efficacy, Job Satisfaction

Abstract

Employees at PT XXX found several problems, namely indications of a lack of employee work engagement with the company. There is employee rotation/mutation in line with changes in the organizational structure, whether they like it or not, employees have to accept it and there are delays in employee promotions because they have to meet new requirements in accordance with new regulations. This problem is due to changes in organizational culture which means the company is in a period of adaptation. This phenomenon is also supported by the low sense of enthusiasm for work and the low enthusiasm that makes people want to be involved in company activities. The aim of this research is to determine and analyze the influence of flexibility, self-efficacy and job satisfaction on the work engagement of PT XXX employees. The population in this study numbered under 100 people, namely 85 people, so the entire population will be used as a saturated sample. The results of this research are 1) Work flexibility partially has a positive and significant effect on work engagement of PT XXX employees. 2) Self-efficacy partially has a positive and significant effect on work engagement of PT XXX employees. 3) Job satisfaction partially has a positive and significant effect on the work engagement of PT XXX employees. 3) Work flexibility, self-efficacy and job satisfaction simultaneously influence employee work engagement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1991). The Measurement and Antecedents of Affective, Continuance and Normative Commitment to the Organizational. Journal of Occupational Psychology.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self efficacy; The Exercise of Control.

Carlson, D. S., Grzywacz, J. G., & Kacmar, K. M. (2010). The Relationship of Schedule Flexibility and Outcomes Via the Work-Family Interface. Journal of Managerial Psychology.

Casper, W. J., & Harris, C. M. (2008). Work-life Benefits and Organizational Attachment: Selfinterest Utility and Signalling Theory Models. Journal of Vocational Behavior

Davis, K., & Newstrom, J. W. (1996). Perilaku Dalam Organisasi. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS 25. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro

Greenhaus, J. H., & Powell, G. N. (2006). When work and family are allies: Atheoryof work-family enrichment. Academy of Management Review.

Hasibuan, M. (2016). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Renaningtyas, W. (2017). Terhadap Keberhasilan Usaha Pada Anggota. 5(4), 668–682

Robbins, S. (2002). Prinsip - prinsip Perilaku Organisasi. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Salangka, Rian dan Lucky Datulong, 2015, Pengaruh self efficacy, self esteem dan lingkungan kerja terhadap kepuasan kerja karyawan pada PT, PLN Wilayah Suluttenggo, Jurnal EMBA Vol. 3 No. 3 Hal. 562-572 ISSN 2303-11

Schaufeli, W., Salanova M, M., Gonzales-Roma, V., & Bakker, A. (2002). Pengukuran Keterlibatan dan Kelelahan: Pendekatan Analitik Faktor Konfirmatori Dua Sampel. Jurnal Studi Kebagiaan.

Shagvaliyeva, S., & Yazdanifard, R. (2014). Impact of Flexiblr Working Hours on Work-Life Balance. American Journal of Industrial and Bussiness Management.

Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Banding: Alphabet.

Tohardi, A. (2002). Pemahaman Praktis Sumber Daya Manusia. Mandar Maju Bandung: Universitas Tanjuung Pura.