Brand Authenticity Effects On Brand Image : Brand Study Of Converse Sneakers For Gen Z

Alifia Saadatul Helma; Muhammad Farid Andika; Nurliya Apriyana

Authors

Alifia Saadatul Helma Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Paramadina, Jakarta , Indonesia
Muhammad Farid Andika Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Paramadina, Jakarta, Indonesia
Nurliya Apriyana Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Paramadina, Jakarta, Indonesia

Keywords:

Brand Image, Originality, Perceived Value, Continuity

Abstract

The swift transformation of the fashion industry, driven by the distinct preferences of Generation Z, has turned sneakers from mere functional footwear into emblems of social status and personal identity. Among the leading brands in this sector is Converse, which consistently secures its status as a top brand through a blend of quality, exclusivity, and authenticity. However, the influence of brand authenticity—comprising originality, perceived value, and continuity—on shaping brand image remains insufficiently explored. This study examines how these aspects of brand authenticity affect the brand image of Converse sneakers among Generation Z in Jabodetabek. Utilizing purposive sampling, 100 respondents aged 18 to 27 participated in this research via an online questionnaire. The analysis conducted with SEM-PLS reveals that originality does not have a significant impact on brand image, while perceived value and continuity positively and significantly influence it. These findings underscore the importance of perceived quality and a consistent brand identity in establishing a robust brand image. It is recommended that Converse focus on delivering exceptional value and maintaining its authenticity to foster loyalty within the Gen Z demographic.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aaker, J. L. (1996). Building strong brands. Free Press.

Araújo, J., Pereira, I. V., & Santos, J. D. (2023). The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on Brand Image and Brand Equity and Its Impact on Consumer Satisfaction. Administrative Sciences, 13(5), 118. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13050118

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2018). Ekspor Ekonomi Kreatif 2010-2018.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2024). Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Trw IV 2023.

Berndt, A. E. (2020). Sampling Methods. Journal of Human Lactation, 36(2), 224–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334420906850

Beverland, M., & Farrelly, F. J. (2010). "The Quest for Authenticity in Consumption: Consumers' Perspective." Journal of Consumer Marketing, 27(3), 220-227.

Bruhn, M., Schoenmueller, V., & Schäfer, A. (2012). Are all corporate brands created equal? Corporate brand personality and corporate brand performance. Journal of Business Research, 65(7), 1041-1048.

Bruhn, M., Schoenmüller, V., Schäfer, D., & Heinrich, D. (2012). Brand authenticity: Towards a deeper understanding of its conceptualization and measurement. Advances in Consumer Research, 40.

Chae, H., Kim, S., Lee, J., & Park, K. (2020). Impact of product characteristics of limited edition shoes on perceived value, brand trust, and purchase intention; focused on the scarcity message frequency. Journal of Business Research, 120, 398–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.040

Dube, L., & Morgan-Thomas, A. (2024). Brand authenticity influence on young adults' luxury sneakers brand preference: the mediating role of brand image. Future Business Journal, 10(33).

Fritz, K., Schoenmueller, V., & Bruhn, M. (2017). Authenticity in branding–exploring antecedents and consequences of brand authenticity. European Journal of Marketing, 51(2), 324–348.

Foroudi, P., Melewar, T. C., & Gupta, S. (2014). Linking corporate logo, corporate image, and reputation: An examination of consumer perceptions in the financial setting. Journal of Business Research, 67(11), 2269-2281

Hagtvedt, H., & Brasel, S. A. (2016). The impact of brand authenticity on consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(3), 432-446.

Iin Mayasari, Dewi Kurniaty, Nurliya Apriyana, & Siti Mudrika. (2024). Keragaman Konsep Brand & Pengukuran "Memahami Konsep Brand dan Pengukuran (Vol. 1). PT RAJAGRAFINDO PERSADA.

Janna, N. M., & Herianto, H. (2021). Konsep uji validitas dan reliabilitas dengan menggunakan SPSS.

JUNG, Z. (2023). THE GEN-Z SNEAKERHEAD PARADOX: BALANCING SUSTAINABILITY AND STREETWEAR IN THE WORLD OF NIKE: FASHION INDUSTRY.

Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 1–22.

Ligaraba, N., Cheng, J., Ndungwane, N. F., & Nyagadza, B. (2024). Brand authenticity influence on young adults’ luxury sneakers brand preference: the mediating role of brand image. Future Business Journal, 10(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-024-00312-w

Morhart, F., Malär, L., Guèvremont, A., Girardin, F., & Grohmann, B. (2015). Brand authenticity: An integrative framework and measurement scale. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(2), 200–218.

Napoli, J., Koenig, L., & Russell, A. (2014). Exploring antecedents and consequences of brand authenticity. European Journal of Marketing, 48(9/10), 1635-1656.

Sherlyta, Y., Putri, S. P., & Yuliana, L. (2024). PENGARUH BRAND SIGNATURE TERHADAP BRAND PERFORMANCE. Jurnal Bina Bangsa Ekonomika, 17(1), 303–311.

w Creswell, J. (2016). Research Design.: Qualitative, Quantitative, Mixed Methods Approaches. University Of Nebraska-Lincoln.

Wiedmann, K. P., Hennigs, N., & Behrens, S. H. (2012). Measuring luxury brand equity: An evaluation of the LBE model. Journal of Brand Management, 19(4), 251-265.

Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2-22.