PAIRWISE COMPARISON METHOD IMPLEMENTATION FOR CHICKEN SUPPLIER SELECTION DECISION MAKING AT CV. GATSU JAYA PERKASA ABADI
Keywords:
Decision Making, Supplier Selection, Pairwise Comparison Method, Weight, Importance, Consistency Index (CI).Abstract
The results show that the recommended chicken supplier from three chicken suppliers based on the score calculated from Pairwise Comparison method is supplier C with a score of 0.4251, followed by supplier B (2nd rank, with a score of 0.2994) and supplier A (3rd rank, with score 0.2755). The recommendation is based on eight criteria: on-time delivery, raw material quality, competitive price, raw material availability, transportation cost, capacity for volume, customer service (communication), and lead time. The Consistency Index (CI)= 0.0416, with a value CI/RI= 0.0295. Since the value of CI/RI is below 0.1, thus the conclusion is that the data consistency is satisfactory.
Downloads
References
K. T. N. Iman and S. Wibisono, “PEMBOBOTAN MENGGUNAKAN PAIRWISE COMPARISON PADA CASE BASED REASONING REKOMENDASI HOTEL,” Jurnal Manajemen Informatika dan Sistem Informasi, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 9–18, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.36595/MISI.V4I1.240.
M. Khairunnisa and W. Septiani, “PEMILIHAN LOKASI USAHA DANI’S AUTO MENGGUNAKAN METODE PAIRWISE COMPARISON DAN COMPARATIVE PREFERENCE INDEX (CPI),” JURNAL PENELITIAN DAN KARYA ILMIAH LEMBAGA PENELITIAN UNIVERSITAS TRISAKTI, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 109–121, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.25105/PDK.V6I1.8633.
Diana, “IMPLEMENTASI COMPOSITE PERFORMANCE INDEX PADA MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING (MCDM) UNTUK MEMILIH LOKASI USAHA UMKM,” Jurnal Ilmiah Matrik, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 169–178, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.33557/JURNALMATRIK.V20I3.465.
B. Render, R. M. Stair, and M. E. Hanna, Quantitative Analysis for Management. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2009.
Saaty, Thomas L, dan Vargas, Luis G., Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Springer Science, 1988.
Ahmadi, H., Rad, M. S., Nazari, M., Nilashi, M., & Ibrahim, O. (2014). Evaluating the factors affecting the implementation of hospital information system (HIS) using AHP method. Life Science Journal, 11(3), 202-207.
Al-Harbi, K. M. A. S. Application of the AHP in project management. International journal of project management, 19(1), 19-27, 2001
AlShamsi, A. T. J. A., Akmal, S., Kamalrudin, M., Yahaya, S. H., & Yuhazri, M. Y. Determination of Key Factors for Total Quality Management Implementation for Airport using AHP. Mathematical Statistician and Engineering Applications, 71(3), 67-83, 2022
Herrmann, Jeffrey. Engineering Decision Making and Risk Management. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2015.
Krajewski, L. J., Mallhotra, M. K., & Ritzman, L. P. Operations Management Processes and Supply Chains, 11th ed. Harlow: Pearson, 2016
Taylor III, Bernard W. Introduction to Management Science, 11th Ed. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson, 2013
Saaty. Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with The Analytic Hierarchy Process Vol. VI. Pittsburgh: RWS Publication, 1994
Herrmann, Jeffrey. Engineering Decision Making and Risk Management. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2015
