NOTARY LIABILITY FOR IRREGULARITIES IN THE DEED OF MEETING RESOLUTION STATEMENT (ANALYSIS OF THE ENGINEERING RESULTS OF THE COMPANY'S GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS)

Authors

  • Jamiatur Robekha Program Studi Magister Kenotariatan, Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas YARSI
  • Chandra Yusuf Program Studi Magister Kenotariatan, Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas YARSI
  • Frengki Hardian Program Studi Magister Kenotariatan, Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas YARSI

Keywords:

Notary, PKPU, Homologation

Abstract

A notary is inseparable from him in making Minutes of Deeds. Minutes of the Deed is the original deed containing the signatures of the appearers, witnesses and notaries, which are kept as part of the notary's protocol. The minutes of the deed also include the number, date, and month of the year whose function is to guarantee certainty that the parties and appearers have met on that date, month, year and time. This study aims to obtain information and analyze laws and regulations regarding Notary Liability for Irregularities in the Deed of Statement of Meeting Resolutions: Engineering Analysis of the Results of the Company's General Meeting of Shareholders. By using the approach method in this study is a normative juridical approach. The formulation of the problem in this research is how is the validity of the Deed of Statement of Meeting Resolutions which becomes evidence in the Notary Deed? and What is the Notary's Responsibility for Irregularities in the Deed of Statement of Meeting Resolutions made based on engineered evidence? Deed of Statement of Meeting Resolutions, referred to as (PKR) is the result of the minutes of the General Meeting of Shareholders (GMS) made privately and then outlined in a Notary deed. This can be conveyed to the party from the Limited Liability Company concerned to be given directly through the GMS. The notary must pay attention in detail that the recipient of the power of attorney is an authorized representative of a Limited Liability Company (PT) and has expertise in making deeds. However, in practice and based on the reality in society, what is done by the Notary is still not in accordance with the procedures required by law or makes mistakes that result in losses for interested parties and the Notary himself. For Notaries. drag the Notary into something. Legal liability due to errors and carelessness, whether intentional or unintentional.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ani Ketut Supasti Dharmawan, et all. “Keberadaan Pemegang Saham Dalam RUPS Dengan Sistem Teleconference Terkait Jaringan Bermasalah Dalam Perspektif Cyber Law,” Udayana Master Law Journal, Vol. 4 No. 1 (Mei 2015)

Arisaputra, Muhammad Ilham. “Kewajiban Notaris Dalam Menjaga Kerahasiaan Akta Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Hak Ingkar Notaris.” Jurnal Perspektif XVII No. 3 (2012):173

Abdul Ghofur Anshori, Lembaga Kenotariatan Indonesia (Perspektif Hukum dan Etika), (Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2012

Ellise T. Sulastini dan Aditya Wahyu. Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Terhadap Akta yang Terindikasi Pidana, (Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2011)

Ghansham Anand dan Agus Yudha Hernoko, Upaya Tuntutan Hak yang Dapat Dilakukan oleh Pihak yang Berkepentingan terhadap Akta Notaris yang Cacat Yuridis, Jurnal Perspektif Hukum Vol. 16 N0. 2 November 2016;

Herlien Budiono, Dasar Teknik Pembuatan Akta Notaris, (Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2017)

H.R., Ridwan. 2006. Hukum Administrasi Negara. Raja Grafindo Persada. Jakarta

Ida Bagus Paramaningrat Manuaba, Prinsip Kehati-hatian Notaris dalam Membuat Akta Otentik, Tesis, Program Magister Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana, 2017

Liliana Tedjosaputro, Malpraktek Notaris dan Hukum Pidana, (Semarang : CV. Agung, 2001)

Munandir, Jonathan Adi Biran & Thohir Luth. 2017.Tanggung Jawab Notaris Atas Akta Pernyataan Keputusan Rapat. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum. 8 (1): 55-63

Philipus M. Hadjon, “Formulir Pendaftaran Tanah Bukan Akta Otentik”, Surabaya Post, 31 Januari 2001

Ridho Ilham, Elwi Danil, Yoserwan, PENERAPAN PRINSIP MENGENALI PENGGUNA JASA OLEH NOTARIS DALAM PENCEGAHAN DAN PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG, Iswara Justitia, Volume 3, Issue 4, Januari 2020

Siswandi. 2017. Problematika Penggunaan Rekaman Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Perkara Pencurian Dihubungkan Dengan Kuhap Jo Undang–Undang No. 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. Skripsi Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pasundan Bandung

Downloads

Published

2023-09-13

How to Cite

Robekha, J., Yusuf, C., & Hardian, F. (2023). NOTARY LIABILITY FOR IRREGULARITIES IN THE DEED OF MEETING RESOLUTION STATEMENT (ANALYSIS OF THE ENGINEERING RESULTS OF THE COMPANY’S GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS). Jurnal Info Sains : Informatika Dan Sains, 13(02), 190–199. Retrieved from https://ejournal.seaninstitute.or.id/index.php/InfoSains/article/view/2850