Enhancing Teacher Performance Assessment in Educational Institutions: An Extreme Programming Approach
Keywords:
Teacher Performance Assessment, Extreme Programming, EducationAbstract
Optimal education quality can be achieved when teachers provide quality and effective teaching. To measure and improve teacher performance, teacher performance appraisal is crucial. Considering the complexity of teachers' tasks, the importance of objective and data-driven teacher appraisals, and the existing problems in teacher appraisal systems, this research aims to investigate and develop a better teacher performance appraisal system to improve education quality in educational institutions. This research adopts the Extreme Programming (XP) approach as the application development method. XP is one agile method that focuses on collaboration, flexibility, and iterative development. The results showed that the application development has reached the user acceptance testing stage. About 85 percent of test participants in user acceptance testing, including teachers, principals, and administrative staff, felt that the app met their needs and could be used well. This research contributes to improving the quality of education in educational institutions by introducing a technology-based teacher performance appraisal application to improve the efficiency and objectivity of the appraisal. In addition, this research develops an understanding of the use of Extreme Programming in developing educational applications.
Downloads
References
A. Calma, G. Suder, and T. P. Kenworthy, “Focus on education: Taking stock of key themes, topics, trends and communities in international business and international management education research,” The International Journal of Management Education, vol. 22, no. 1, p. 100902, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100902.
M. Widodo, “Exploring the Role of Educational Technology in Promoting Civic Education in Indonesia: Current State, Challenges, and Opportunities,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
H. STAI Rasyidiyah Khalidiyah Amuntai Kalimantan Selatan and S. STAI Rasyidiyah Khalidiyah Amuntai Kalimantan Selatan, “National Standards of Education in Contents Standards and Education Process Standards in Indonesia,” 2022.
J. Lassa, M. Petal, and A. Surjan, “Understanding the impacts of floods on learning quality, school facilities, and educational recovery in Indonesia,” Disasters, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 412–436, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1111/disa.12543.
S. H. Halili, “Technological Advancements in Education 4.0,” The Online Journal of Distance Education and e-Learning, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 63–69, 2019, [Online]. Available: www.tojdel.net
Anealka Aziz, “Education 4.0 Made Simple: Ideas For Teaching,” International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, vol. 6, no. 3, p. 92, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://journals.aiac.org.au/index.php/IJELS/article/view/4616
D. Yin, “Study on the Simulative Financial Management System in ERP Education,” IERI Procedia, vol. 2, pp. 642–648, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.ieri.2012.06.147.
M. Alam, “Activists’ heterodoxic beliefs in fostering urban environmental education in Indonesia,” Local Development & Society, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 128–145, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1080/26883597.2022.2058887.
V. Khatibi, A. Keramati, and F. Shirazi, “Deployment of a business intelligence model to evaluate Iranian national higher education,” Social Sciences & Humanities Open, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 100056, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100056.
I. Y. Al-Filali, R. M. S. Abdulaal, S. M. Alawi, and A. A. Makki, “Modification of Strategic Planning Tools for Planning Financial Sustainability in Higher Education Institutions,” Journal of Engineering Research, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jer.2023.11.015.
M. Nermend, S. Singh, and U. S. Singh, “An evaluation of decision on paradigm shift in higher education by digital transformation,” in Procedia Computer Science, Elsevier B.V., 2022, pp. 1959–1969. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2022.09.255.
M. Paasivaara, B. Behm, C. Lassenius, and M. Hallikainen, “Large-scale agile transformation at Ericsson: a case study,” Empir Softw Eng, vol. 23, no. 5, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s10664-017-9555-8.
M. A. Dewi and R. Irham, “Penerapan Agile Scrum Pada Pengembangan Aplikasi Bimbingan Daring Skripsi Mahasiswa,” vol. 4, no. 2, Mar. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.47970/siskom-kb.v4i2.195.
A. Mishra and Y. I. Alzoubi, “Structured software development versus agile software development: a comparative analysis,” International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s13198-023-01958-5.
R. Hasan, A.- Ta, and R. Razali, “Prioritizing Requirements in Agile Development : A Conceptual Framework,” Procedia Technology, vol. 11, no. Iceei, pp. 733–739, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.protcy.2013.12.252.
A. Akhtar, B. Bakhtawar, and S. Akhtar, “EXTREME PROGRAMMING VS SCRUM: A COMPARISON OF AGILE MODELS,” International Journal of Technology, Innovation and Management (IJTIM), vol. 2, p. 2022, doi: 10.54489/ijtim.v2i1.77.
J. Chen, T. Yu, L. Yin, J. Tang, and H. Wang, “A unified time scale intelligent control algorithm for microgrid based on extreme dynamic programming,” CSEE Journal of Power and Energy Systems, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 583–590, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.17775/CSEEJPES.2019.00100.
T. Dingsøyr, S. Nerur, V. Balijepally, and N. B. Moe, “A decade of agile methodologies: Towards explaining agile software development,” Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 85, no. 6. 2012. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.02.033.
P. Serrador and J. K. Pinto, “Does Agile work? - A quantitative analysis of agile project success,” International Journal of Project Management, vol. 33, no. 5, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.01.006.
R. Santos et al., “A Comparative Analysis of Agile Teamwork Quality Instruments in Agile Software Development: A Qualitative Approach”, doi: 10.18293/DMSVIVA2023-217.
S. Al-Saqqa, S. Sawalha, and H. Abdelnabi, “Agile software development: Methodologies and trends,” International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, vol. 14, no. 11, 2020, doi: 10.3991/ijim.v14i11.13269.
T. Dingsoeyr, D. Falessi, and K. Power, “Agile Development at Scale: The Next Frontier,” IEEE Software, vol. 36, no. 2. IEEE Computer Society, pp. 30–38, Mar. 01, 2019. doi: 10.1109/MS.2018.2884884.
F. Almeida, J. Simões, and S. Lopes, “Exploring the Benefits of Combining DevOps and Agile,” Future Internet, vol. 14, no. 2, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.3390/fi14020063.
