Enhancing Project Visibility: A Study on Construction Project Dashboard Development with Extreme Programming
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54209/infosains.v14i01.3739Keywords:
Project Visibility, Extreme Programming Construction Project, DashboardAbstract
This research aims to improve the visibility and effectiveness of construction project management by developing a project dashboard using the Extreme Programming (XP) approach. The focus of this research is to design and implement an intuitive, responsive, and adaptive project dashboard to support real-time monitoring of project progress. XP methodology was integrated to deliver flexible and high-quality software development. The research included an analysis of the complexity of construction projects, emerging management challenges, and visibility limitations in construction projects. In addition, the research defines the project dashboard as a crucial visualization tool to increase transparency and user engagement. Innovation through the Extreme Programming (XP) approach was introduced, focusing on introducing the basic principles of XP and their relevance in construction software development. The results of testing the application features showed positive responses, both in technical and functional terms. Technology acceptance testing validated the successful integration of IoT technologies, data security, and application performance. By involving users in alpha and beta tests, the research gained valuable feedback to improve the app before the official launch. The research confirmed that the development of a construction project dashboard using the XP approach has the potential to improve the visibility, transparency, and effectiveness of construction project management. This research contributes to the practical and theoretical understanding of dealing with the complexity of construction projects by utilizing innovative software development technologies and methodologies.
Downloads
References
P. V. Ingle and G. Mahesh, “Construction project performance areas for Indian construction projects,” International Journal of Construction Management, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 1443–1454, 2022, doi: 10.1080/15623599.2020.1721177.
S. Divya Sankar and J. Selvam, “Risk Management in Construction Industry,” International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 2020, [Online]. Available: www.irjet.net
J. I. Alzahrani and M. W. Emsley, “The impact of contractors ’ attributes on construction project success : A post construction evaluation,” JPMA, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 313–322, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.06.006.
M. M. Marzouk, “Automation in Construction ELECTRE III model for value engineering applications,” Autom Constr, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 596–600, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2010.11.026.
Y.-Y. Lai, L.-H. Yeh, P.-F. Chen, P.-H. Sung, and Y.-M. Lee, “Management and Recycling of Construction Waste in Taiwan,” Procedia Environ Sci, vol. 35, pp. 723–730, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.proenv.2016.07.077.
P. H. D. Nguyen and A. Robinson Fayek, “Applications of fuzzy hybrid techniques in construction engineering and management research,” Autom Constr, vol. 134, p. 104064, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2021.104064.
A. Fredriksson and M. Huge-Brodin, “Green construction logistics – a multi-actor challenge,” Research in Transportation Business and Management, vol. 45, no. PA, p. 100830, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2022.100830.
D. Jato-Espino, E. Castillo-Lopez, J. Rodriguez-Hernandez, and J. C. Canteras-Jordana, “A review of application of multi-criteria decision making methods in construction,” Automation in Construction, vol. 45. Elsevier B.V., pp. 151–162, 2014. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2014.05.013.
A. Nieto-Morote and F. Ruz-Vila, “A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model for construction contractor prequalification,” Autom Constr, vol. 25, pp. 8–19, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2012.04.004.
F. Guo, K. Wang, and E. Cao, “A Digital Twin (DT) Framework at Design and Construction Phases,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371416031
J. Choi and M. Ha, “Validation of project management information systems for industrial construction projects,” Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 2046–2057, 2022, doi: 10.1080/13467581.2021.1941999.
J. Gao, “Research on Financial Informatization Construction of Business and Finance Integration,” International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 354–358, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.21275/sr22704192347.
J. Zhang, J. C. P. Cheng, W. Chen, and K. Chen, “Digital Twins for Construction Sites: Concepts, LoD Definition, and Applications,” Journal of Management in Engineering, vol. 38, no. 2, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000948.
Y. Celik, I. Petri, and Y. Rezgui, “Integrating BIM and Blockchain across construction lifecycle and supply chains,” Comput Ind, vol. 148, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2023.103886.
S. Rajabi, S. El-Sayegh, and L. Romdhane, “Identification and assessment of sustainability performance indicators for construction projects,” Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, vol. 15, no. June, p. 100193, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.indic.2022.100193.
H. Xu et al., “Application of Artificial Neural Networks in Construction Management: A Scientometric Review,” Buildings, vol. 12, no. 7. MDPI, Jul. 01, 2022. doi: 10.3390/buildings12070952.
R. A. Bahamid, S. I. Doh, M. A. Khoiry, M. A. Kassem, and M. A. Al-Sharafi, “The Current Risk Management Practices and Knowledge in the Construction Industry,” Buildings, vol. 12, no. 7, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.3390/buildings12071016.
A. Serpell and H. Rubio, “Evaluating project management (PM) readiness in construction companies: cases from Chile,” Procedia Comput Sci, vol. 219, pp. 1642–1649, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.457.
A. T. Tessema, G. A. Alene, and N. M. Wolelaw, “Assessment of risk factors on construction projects in gondar city, Ethiopia,” Heliyon, vol. 8, no. 11, p. e11726, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11726.
D. Sihombing, “Development of construction project cost budget application using rapid application development method,” Online, 2023.
A. Khodabakhshian and F. Re Cecconi, “Data-Driven Process Mining Framework for Risk Management in Construction Projects,” in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Institute of Physics, 2022. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1101/3/032023.
V. Brodskiy, “Improving transport and technological process to supply material resources for house construction,” Transportation Research Procedia, vol. 63, pp. 639–647, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2022.06.057.
O. Taylan, A. O. Bafail, R. M. S. Abdulaal, and M. R. Kabli, “Construction projects selection and risk assessment by fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methodologies,” Applied Soft Computing Journal, vol. 17, pp. 105–116, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2014.01.003.
D. J. C. Sihombing, “Analysis and development of the ProTrack application: construction timeline management using Extreme Programming Methodology,” Online, 2023.
M. Altaf et al., “Evaluating the awareness and implementation level of LCCA in the construction industry of Malaysia,” Ain Shams Engineering Journal, vol. 13, no. 5, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.asej.2021.101686.
I. Gupta, T. V. Raman, and N. Tripathy, “Impact of Merger and Acquisition on Financial Performance: Evidence from Construction and Real Estate Industry of India,” FIIB Business Review, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 74–84, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1177/23197145211053400.
S. Saad, W. S. Alaloul, S. Ammad, M. Altaf, and A. H. Qureshi, “Identification of critical success factors for the adoption of Industrialized Building System (IBS) in Malaysian construction industry,” Ain Shams Engineering Journal, vol. 13, no. 2, p. 101547, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.asej.2021.06.031.
C. Zhang, M. Hu, F. Di Maio, B. Sprecher, X. Yang, and A. Tukker, “An overview of the waste hierarchy framework for analyzing the circularity in construction and demolition waste management in Europe,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 803. Elsevier B.V., Jan. 10, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149892.
H. Aulawi, F. Nuraeni, R. Setiawan, W. F. Rianto, A. Surya Pratama, and H. Maulana, “Simple Additive Weighting in the Development of a Decision Support System for the Selection of House Construction Project Teams,” in 2023 International Conference on Computer Science, Information Technology and Engineering (ICCoSITE), 2023, pp. 517–522. doi: 10.1109/ICCoSITE57641.2023.10127813.
A. Awad and A. R. Fayek, “A decision support system for contractor prequalification for surety bonding,” Automation in Construction, vol. 21, no. 1. Elsevier B.V., pp. 89–98, 2012. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2011.05.017.
T. Dingsøyr, S. Nerur, V. Balijepally, and N. B. Moe, “A decade of agile methodologies: Towards explaining agile software development,” Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 85, no. 6. 2012. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.02.033.
P. Serrador and J. K. Pinto, “Does Agile work? - A quantitative analysis of agile project success,” International Journal of Project Management, vol. 33, no. 5, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.01.006.
R. Santos et al., “A Comparative Analysis of Agile Teamwork Quality Instruments in Agile Software Development: A Qualitative Approach”, doi: 10.18293/DMSVIVA2023-217.
S. Al-Saqqa, S. Sawalha, and H. Abdelnabi, “Agile software development: Methodologies and trends,” International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, vol. 14, no. 11, 2020, doi: 10.3991/ijim.v14i11.13269.
T. Dingsoeyr, D. Falessi, and K. Power, “Agile Development at Scale: The Next Frontier,” IEEE Software, vol. 36, no. 2. IEEE Computer Society, pp. 30–38, Mar. 01, 2019. doi: 10.1109/MS.2018.2884884.
A. Akhtar, B. Bakhtawar, and S. Akhtar, “EXTREME PROGRAMMING VS SCRUM: A COMPARISON OF AGILE MODELS,” International Journal of Technology, Innovation and Management (IJTIM), vol. 2, p. 2022, doi: 10.54489/ijtim.v2i1.77.
J. Chen, T. Yu, L. Yin, J. Tang, and H. Wang, “A unified time scale intelligent control algorithm for microgrid based on extreme dynamic programming,” CSEE Journal of Power and Energy Systems, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 583–590, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.17775/CSEEJPES.2019.00100.
R. Hasan, A.- Ta, and R. Razali, “Prioritizing Requirements in Agile Development : A Conceptual Framework,” Procedia Technology, vol. 11, no. Iceei, pp. 733–739, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.protcy.2013.12.252.
A. Mishra and Y. I. Alzoubi, “Structured software development versus agile software development: a comparative analysis,” International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s13198-023-01958-5.
M. Paasivaara, B. Behm, C. Lassenius, and M. Hallikainen, “Large-scale agile transformation at Ericsson: a case study,” Empir Softw Eng, vol. 23, no. 5, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s10664-017-9555-8.
M. Batliner, S. Boës, J. Heck, and M. Meboldt, “Linking Testing Activities with Success in Agile Development of Physical Products,” in Procedia CIRP, Elsevier B.V., 2022, pp. 146–154. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2022.05.228.
G. Gutierrez, J. Garzas, M. T. G. De Lena, and J. M. Moguerza, “Self-Managing: An Empirical Study of the Practice in Agile Teams,” IEEE Softw, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 23–27, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1109/MS.2018.2874324.
A. Martin, “Introduction to an agile framework for the management of technology transfer projects,” Procedia Comput Sci, vol. 219, pp. 1963–1968, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.496.