Implementation of agile approach in developing adverse drug reaction monitoring system at pharmacy

Authors

  • Denny Jean Cross Sihombing Faculty of Engineering, Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia

Keywords:

Adverse Drug Reaction, Application, Agile Methodology, Pharmacies

Abstract

Healthcare systems are increasingly adopting Agile methodologies to address the complexities of software development in dynamic environments. This study investigates the application of Agile methodology in developing an adverse drug reaction monitoring system within a pharmacy context. The research focuses on identifying user requirements, employing iterative Agile practices, and evaluating functional outcomes. Through an analysis of user needs and preferences, wireframing, and iterative development cycles, the study demonstrates the effectiveness of Agile in meeting evolving demands and ensuring user satisfaction. Results indicate that Agile methodology facilitates flexible and responsive development, enabling continuous improvement and adaptation to changing requirements. The collaborative nature of Agile fosters stakeholder engagement and communication, enhancing the relevance and usability of the monitoring system. This research contributes to the growing body of literature on Agile methodology in healthcare software development, providing insights into its application, benefits, and implications for pharmacy settings.

Downloads

References

Alami, A., Zahedi, M., & Krancher, O. (2023). Antecedents of psychological safety in agile software development teams. Information and Software Technology, 162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2023.107267

Alghamdi, K. S., Petzold, M., Alsugoor, M. H., Makeen, H. A., Al Monif, K. H., & Hussain-Alkhateeb, L. (2023). Community pharmacists’ perspectives towards automated pharmacy systems and extended community pharmacy services: An online cross-sectional study. Exploratory Research in Clinical and Social Pharmacy, 12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcsop.2023.100363

Almeida, F., Simões, J., & Lopes, S. (2022). Exploring the Benefits of Combining DevOps and Agile. Future Internet, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/fi14020063

Al-Saqqa, S., Sawalha, S., & Abdelnabi, H. (2020). Agile software development: Methodologies and trends. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 14(11). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i11.13269

Andia, T., Mantilla, C., Morales, Á., Ortiz, S., & Rodríguez-Lesmes, P. (2022). Does price-cap regulation work for increasing access to contraceptives? Aggregate- and pharmacy-level evidence from Colombia. Social Science and Medicine, 311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115312

Batliner, M., Boës, S., Heck, J., & Meboldt, M. (2022). Linking Testing Activities with Success in Agile Development of Physical Products. Procedia CIRP, 109, 146–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2022.05.228

Bomström, H., Kelanti, M., Annanperä, E., Liukkunen, K., Kilamo, T., Sievi-Korte, O., & Systä, K. (2023). Information needs and presentation in agile software development. Information and Software Technology, 162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2023.107265

Dingsoeyr, T., Falessi, D., & Power, K. (2019). Agile Development at Scale: The Next Frontier. In IEEE Software (Vol. 36, Issue 2, pp. 30–38). IEEE Computer Society. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2018.2884884

Estrada-Esponda, R. D., López-Benítez, M., Matturro, G., & Osorio-Gómez, J. C. (2024). Selection of software agile practices using Analytic hierarchy process. Heliyon, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22948

Humpert, L., Röhm, B., Anacker, H., Dumitrescu, R., & Anderl, R. (2022). Method for direct end customer integration into the agile product development. Procedia CIRP, 109, 215–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2022.05.239

Johnson, J. L., Blefari, C., & Marotti, S. (2024). Application of the COM-B model to explore barriers and facilitators to participation in research by hospital pharmacists and pharmacy technicians: A cross-sectional mixed-methods survey. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 20(1), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.10.002

Khan, O., Parvez, M., Kumari, P., Parvez, S., & Ahmad, S. (2023). The future of pharmacy: How AI is revolutionizing the industry. Intelligent Pharmacy, 1(1), 32–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipha.2023.04.008

López, L., Burgués, X., Martínez-Fernández, S., Vollmer, A. M., Behutiye, W., Karhapää, P., Franch, X., Rodríguez, P., & Oivo, M. (2022). Quality measurement in agile and rapid software development: A systematic mapping. Journal of Systems and Software, 186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2021.111187

Meiliana, Daniella, G., Wijaya, N., Putra, N. G. E., & Efata, R. (2023). Agile Software Development Effort Estimation based on Product Backlog Items. Procedia Computer Science, 227, 186–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.10.516

Michalides, M., Bursac, N., Nicklas, S. J., Weiss, S., & Paetzold, K. (2023). Analyzing current Challenges on Scaled Agile Development of Physical Products. Procedia CIRP, 119, 1188–1197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2023.02.188

Mishra, A., & Alzoubi, Y. I. (2023). Structured software development versus agile software development: a comparative analysis. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-023-01958-5

Moote, R., Kennedy, A., Ratcliffe, T., Gaspard, C., Leach, E. R., Vives, M., & Zorek, J. A. (2023). Clinical Interprofessional Education in Inpatient Pharmacy: Findings From a Secondary Analysis of a Scoping Review. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 100617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpe.2023.100617

Mospan, C. M., & Gillette, C. (n.d.). BRIEF Impact of a Simulated Legislative Visit on Student Pharmacists’ Political Skill Inventory Scores.

Najihi, S., Elhadi, S., Abdelouahid, R. A., & Marzak, A. (2022). Software Testing from an Agile and Traditional view. Procedia Computer Science, 203, 775–782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.07.116

Paasivaara, M., Behm, B., Lassenius, C., & Hallikainen, M. (2018). Large-scale agile transformation at Ericsson: a case study. Empirical Software Engineering, 23(5). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-017-9555-8

Phanudulkitti, C., Puengrung, S., & Farris, K. B. (2023). Patient care and customer services during the COVID-19 pandemic at accredited pharmacies: Pharmacists and patients’ perspectives. Exploratory Research in Clinical and Social Pharmacy, 12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcsop.2023.100336

Pharmaceutical-supply-chain-management-through-implementatio_2015_Annals-of-. (n.d.).

Rindell, K., Ruohonen, J., Holvitie, J., Hyrynsalmi, S., & Leppänen, V. (2021). Security in agile software development: A practitioner survey. Information and Software Technology, 131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2020.106488

Rushton, R., Lorraine, O., Tiong, J., Karim, M., Dixon, R., Greenshields, W., Marotti, R., & Bretaña, N. A. (2023). Forecasting inventory for the state-wide pharmaceutical service of South Australia. Procedia Computer Science, 219, 1257–1264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.409

Shrivastava, S. V., & Rathod, U. (2014). Risks in Distributed Agile Development: A Review. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 133, 417–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.208

Tøndel, I. A., Cruzes, D. S., Jaatun, M. G., & Sindre, G. (2022). Influencing the security prioritisation of an agile software development project. Computers and Security, 118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2022.102744

Downloads

Published

2024-03-04

How to Cite

Sihombing, D. J. C. (2024). Implementation of agile approach in developing adverse drug reaction monitoring system at pharmacy. Jurnal Info Sains : Informatika Dan Sains, 14(01), 1027–1035. Retrieved from https://ejournal.seaninstitute.or.id/index.php/InfoSains/article/view/4198

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 > >>