Decision Support System For Determining The Best Lecturers And Students In The Information Technology Study Program, UM Palembang Using The Multi Attribute Utility Theory Method
Keywords:
Best Lecturers and Stundents, Academic Performance Evaluation, Multi Attribute Utility Theory, RAD, SPK.Abstract
Evaluation of lecturer performance and student achievement is an important step to maintain academic quality in higher education. The Information Technology Study Program at Universitas Muhammadiyah Palembang requires an efficient and objective system to select the best lecturers and students, considering their role in improving academic quality and institutional reputation. This study aims to develop a technology-based decision support system (DSS) to improve the automation and accuracy of the selection process. Using the Multi Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) method, various assessment criteria are processed into standardized scores, allowing for objective assessment of lecturers and students. The Rapid Application Development (RAD) method is used in system development to ensure the process is fast and effective. This system is designed using various modeling diagrams, such as flowcharts, use case diagrams, and class diagrams, to ensure a clear, structured, and easily understood workflow for users, including administration and academics.The test results show that this system facilitates the selection process, reduces processing time, and minimizes errors that often occur in manual assessments. In addition, this system increases the transparency of assessments, provides objective, accurate, and accountable results, and encourages healthy competition among lecturers and students. The success of this implementation is expected to become a standard for periodic assessment in higher education. In addition, this system has the potential to be developed into a web-based application, which allows wider access for the entire academic community and increases the accessibility and effectiveness of the selection process in the future.
Downloads
References
Aldo, D. (2019). SPK Penilaian Kinerja Dosen Dengan Menggunakan Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory ( Maut ). Jursima, 7(2), 76. https://doi.org/10.47024/js.v7i2.180
Annisa Amalia, A., & Santoso, N. (2021). Pengembangan Sistem Informasi Pembelajaran Daring Blended System berbasis Web. 5(11), 4961–4969. http://j-ptiik.ub.ac.id
Ayoub, A., Potdar, V., Rudra, A., & Luong, H. (2020). Impact of Nepotism on the Human Resources Component of ERP Systems Implementation in Lebanon. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1210 CCIS(1), 116–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7530-3_9
Dwitasari, F. (2024). Analisis Evaluasi Vendor Menggunakan Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) di PT XYZ. Jurnal LOGIC (Logistics & Supply Chain Center), 3(1), 33–37. https://doi.org/10.33197/logic.vol3.iss1.2024.2250
Ermawati, S., & Hidayat, T. (2017). Penilaian Autentik dan Relevansinya Dengan Kualitas Hasil Pembelajaran (Persepsi Dosen dan Mahasiswa IKIIP PGRI Bojonegoro). Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Sosial, 27(1), 1412–3835.
Faran, J., & Aldisa, R. T. (2023). Implementasi Metode MAUT dengan Menerapkan Pembobotan ROC Dalam Pemilihan Ketua Himpunan Mahasiswa. Jurnal Media Informatika Budidarma, 7(3), 1315. https://doi.org/10.30865/mib.v7i3.6471
FURAT, S. R. AL. (2023). SPK Rekrutmen Karyawan Pada Pt Bhandawa Metafora Warsoyo Menggunakan Gabungan Metode Ahp Dan Saw. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952., 5–24. http://repo.iain-tulungagung.ac.id/5510/5/BAB 2.pdf
Huda, R., Defit, S., Sovia, R., & Komputer, F. I. (2024). Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory Dalam Pemilihan Dosen Terbaik Berdasarkan Kinerja. 5(4), 1706–1715.
Keterbukaan, E., Sistem, I., Akademik, P., Sekolah, D. I., Studi, P., Ilmu, M., Publik, A., Pascasarjana, P., & Area, U. M. (2018). Npm.161801029.
Maharrani, R. H., Supriyono, A. R., & Syafirullah, L. (2021). SIPGANG: Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Rekomendasi Magang Industri Berbasis Multi Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT). Jurnal Edukasi Dan Penelitian Informatika (JEPIN), 7(3), 473. https://doi.org/10.26418/jp.v7i3.49478
Maritsa, A., Hanifah Salsabila, U., Wafiq, M., Rahma Anindya, P., & Azhar Ma’shum, M. (2021). Pengaruh Teknologi Dalam Dunia P'endidikan. Al-Mutharahah: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Kajian Sosial Keagamaan, 18(2), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.46781/al-mutharahah.v18i2.303
Marpaung1, N., Handayani2, M., & Yesputra3, R. (2018). SPK PEMILIHAN DOSEN TERBAIK DENGAN METODE WEIGHTED PRODUCT (WP) PADA STMIK ROYAL.
Mondial, L., Deha, D., Fil, S., & Kom, M. I. (n.d.). Kata Kunci: Efisiensi administrasi, Sekretaris, Teknologi informasi.
Pricillia, T., & Zulfachmi. (2021). Perbandingan Metode Pengembangan Perangkat Lunak (Waterfall, Prototipe, RAD). Jurnal Bangkit Indonesia, 10(1), 6–12. https://doi.org/10.52771/bangkitindonesia.v10i1.153
Ramadhan, M. Z., & Angelia, F. (2023). Mengoptimalkan pengembangan aplikasi mobile melalui perbandingan metode pengembangan perangkat lunak (Waterfall, Prototype, Mobile-D, Agile, RAD). Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Informasi Dan Sains, 3(2), 13–19.
Setiawan, Y., & Budilaksono, S. (2021). SPK Pemilihan Mahasiswa Lulusan Terbaik Dengan Menggunakan Metode Multy Attribute Utility Theory (Maut) DiStmik Antar Bangsa. Ikraith-Informatika, 6(2), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.37817/ikraith-informatika.v6i2.1566
Ummah, M. S. (2019). Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi Dalam Manajemen Pendidikan. In Sustainability (Switzerland) (Vol. 11, Issue 1). http://scioteca.caf.com/bitstream/handle/123456789/1091/RED2017-Eng-8ene.pdf?sequence=12&isAllowed=y%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.06.005%0Ahttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/305320484_SISTEM_PEMBETUNGAN_TERPUSAT_STRATEGI_MELESTARI