The Intersection Of Customary Law And National Land Law In The Settlement Of Land Disputes In Indonesia

Authors

  • Vincentius Raymond Wijaya Univeristas Pelita Harapan, Surabaya, Indonesia

Keywords:

Customary Law, National Land Law, Land Disputes

Abstract

Customary land disputes in Indonesia reflect the complex relationship between customary law and state law, which often creates tensions and injustices for indigenous peoples. This research aims to explore the interaction between the two legal systems, with a focus on the recognition of indigenous peoples' customary rights in land dispute resolution. Legal Pluralism Theory is used as the main framework to analyze how customary law and formal law interact, collaborate, or clash. Data collected through interviews, legal documents, observations, and focus group discussions (FGDs) are analyzed to identify the challenges faced by indigenous peoples in obtaining their land rights. The results are expected to provide strategic recommendations on more inclusive and adaptive legal mechanisms, as well as customary land conflict resolution strategies based on distributive justice and social harmony. The research also emphasizes the importance of customary mediation as an alternative solution that is more responsive to local needs. By adopting a decentralized and participatory approach, this research will offer a more comprehensive picture of the dynamics of customary land conflicts in Indonesia, and strengthen the policy foundation to support social justice and the protection of indigenous peoples' rights.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Basri, M. (2021). Legal Pluralism and Mediation of Land Conflicts in Indigenous Communities in Indonesia. Jakarta: Lembaga Kajian Sosial dan Hukum.

Bowen, J. R. (2000). Case Study Approaches in Social and Cultural Systems: Conflict and Resolution. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Chalfin, B. (2023). Tensions Between Formal and Traditional Laws: Lessons from Africa. Journal of Comparative Law, 45(3), 123–146.

Fitzpatrick, D. (2005). Best Practice Options for the Legal Recognition of Customary Tenure. Development and Change, 36(3), 449–475.

Halversen, T. (2024). Multicultural Land Policies in Latin America: Bridging the Formal and Informal. Land Use Policy Journal, 39(2), 234–258.

Kamphorst, E. (2017). Participatory Approaches to Indigenous Land Rights in Southeast Asia. Asian Studies Review, 41(4), 589–607.

Kementerian Agraria dan Tata Ruang/Badan Pertanahan Nasional (BPN). (2020). Laporan Tahunan: Kasus Sengketa Tanah di Indonesia. Jakarta: BPN.

Kementerian Kehutanan. (2012). Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 35/PUU-X/2012. Jakarta: Kementerian Kehutanan.

Kusumawardani, R., & Rahmawati, L. (2022). Sengketa Tanah Ulayat Masyarakat Adat di Indonesia: Perspektif Hukum dan Politik. Bandung: Penerbit Kawan Pustaka.

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. (2012). Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 35/PUU-X/2012: Pengujian Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-Pokok Agraria. Jakarta: Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia.

Merry, S. E. (1988). Legal Pluralism. Law and Society Review, 22(5), 869–896.

Prasetyo, W., & Hartini, D. (2023). Recognition of Communal Land Rights in Indonesia: A Study of Customary Land Tenure Systems. Journal of Indonesian Law and Society, 15(2), 198–211.

Purwanto, A. (2023). Resolving Land Conflicts in Indonesia: Challenges and Opportunities. Yogyakarta: UGM Press.

Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Tamanaha, B. Z. (2008). Understanding Legal Pluralism: Past to Present, Local to Global. Sydney Law Review, 30(3), 375–411.

UUD 1945. Pasal 18B Ayat (2).

Downloads

Published

2024-12-04

How to Cite

Vincentius Raymond Wijaya. (2024). The Intersection Of Customary Law And National Land Law In The Settlement Of Land Disputes In Indonesia. Jurnal Multidisiplin Sahombu, 4(02), 401–407. Retrieved from https://ejournal.seaninstitute.or.id/index.php/JMS/article/view/5788