The Influence of Capital Intensity and Foreign Ownership on Tax Avoidance in Consumer Goods Industry Companies

Authors

  • Devi Sarmila Dalimunte Faculty of Economics and Business, Pamulang University
  • Euis Nessia Fitri Faculty of Economics and Business, Pamulang University

Keywords:

Capital Intensity, Foreign Ownership, Tax Avoidance, Consumer Goods Companies

Abstract

This study aims to examine the effect of capital intensity and foreign ownership on tax avoidance in consumer goods sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Using a quantitative approach with associative research design, the data were analyzed through multiple linear regression. The population in this study includes all consumer goods manufacturing companies listed during the period of observation, while the sample consists of selected companies in the food and beverage subsector that meet specific criteria using purposive sampling. The research findings indicate that both capital intensity and foreign ownership have significant positive influences on corporate tax avoidance. Companies with substantial capital investment and higher proportions of foreign ownership tend to engage more actively in tax avoidance strategies. These results highlight the role of ownership structure and asset composition in shaping corporate tax behavior. The study contributes to the existing literature and offers insights for policymakers to strengthen tax regulation and improve compliance.

Downloads

References

Alianda, I., Andreas, A., & Nasrizal, N. (2021). Pengaruh Kepemilikan Asing, Foreign Operation dan Manajemen Laba Riil Terhadap Penghindaran Pajak. The Journal of Taxation: Tax Center, 2(1), 94-115.

Alkurdi, A., & Mardini, G. H. (2020). The impact of ownership structure and the board of directors’ composition on tax avoidance strategies: empirical evidence from Jordan. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 18(4), 795-812.

Artinasari, N., & Mildawati, T. (2018). Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Leverage, Likuidittas, Capital Intensity Dan Inventory Intensity Terhadap Tax Avoidance. Jurnal Ilmu dan Riset Akuntansi (JIRA), 7(8).

Chen, S., Chen, X., Cheng, Q., & Shevlin, T. (2010). Are family firms more tax aggressive than non-family firms? Journal of Financial Economics, 95(1), 41–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2009.02.003

Desai, M. A., Foley, C. F., & Hines, J. R. (2006). The demand for tax haven operations. Journal of Public Economics, 90(3), 513–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2005.04.004

Directorate General of Taxes. (2007). Laporan hasil pemeriksaan PT Coca Cola Indonesia. Jakarta: DJP Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia.

Ekadyary, C. (2021). Pengaruh Kepemilikan Institusional, Intensitas Modal, Kualitas Audit, dan CSR terhadap Penghindaran Pajak pada Perusahaan Pertambangan yang Terdaftar di BEI Tahun 2016-2020 (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Hayam Wuruk Perbanas Surabaya).

Ghozali, I. (2018). Multivariate analysis application with IBM SPSS 23 program (8th ed.). Semarang: Diponegoro University Publishing Agency.

Hanlon, M., & Heitzman, S. (2010). A review of tax research. The Accounting Review, 85(3), 797– 804. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2010.85.3.797

Ikraam, I., & Ariyanto, A. (2020). Pengaruh Struktur Kepemilikan Asing Dan Intensitas ModalPerusahaan Terhadap Praktik Penghindaran Pajak. In FORBISWIRA FORUM BISNIS DAN KEWIRAUSAHAAN (Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 27-37).

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

Lanis, R., & Richardson, G. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and tax aggressiveness: A test of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 25(3), 344–371. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513571211209653

Mardiasmo. (2018). Perpajakan (Edisi Revisi). Yogyakarta: Andi.

Ministry of Finance. (2017). Tax amnesty report: Outcomes and impacts. Jakarta: Ministry of Finance Republic of Indonesia.

Musgrave, R. A., & Musgrave, P. B. (1989). Public finance in theory and practice (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

OECD. (2010). Tax amnesty: Design, implementation, and impact. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264085147-en

Putri, N. R., & Irawati, W. (2019). Pengaruh Kepemilikan Manajerial dan Effective Tax Rate terhadap Kebijakan Dividen dengan Likuiditas sebagai Variabel Moderating. Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi, 3(1), 93-108.

Rego, S. O. (2003). Tax avoidance activities of U.S. multinational corporations. Contemporary Accounting Research, 20(4), 805–833. https://doi.org/10.1506/VANN-B7UB-GMFA-9E6W

Richardson, G., & Lanis, R. (2007). Determinants of the variability in corporate effective tax rates and tax reform: Evidence from Australia. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 26(6), 689–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2007.10.003

Richardson, G., Taylor, G., & Lanis, R. (2013). The impact of board of director oversight characteristics on corporate tax aggressiveness: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 32(3), 68–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2013.02.004

Rinaldi, M., Respati, N. W., & Fatimah, F. (2020). Pengaruh Corporate Social Responsibility, Political Connection, Capital Intensity Dan Inventory Intensity Terhadap Tax Aggressiveness. Simak, 18(02), 149-171.

Salihu, I. A., Annuar, H. A., & Obid, S. N. S. (2015). Foreign investors' interests and corporate tax avoidance: Evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 11(2), 138-147.

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach (7th ed.). Chichester: Wiley.

Slemrod, J. (2004). The economics of corporate tax selfishness. National Tax Journal, 57(4), 877–899. https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2004.4.05

Stickney, C. P., & McGee, V. E. (1982). Effective corporate tax rates: The effect of size, capital intensity, leverage, and other factors. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 1(2), 125–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-4254(82)80004-5

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif dan kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Susanti, S., & Fahlevi, H. (2016). Pengaruh pendapatan asli daerah, dana alokasi umum, dan dana bagi hasil terhadap belanja modal (studi pada kabupaten/kota di wilayah Aceh). Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekonomi Akuntansi, 1(1), 183-191.

Yolanda, D. Tarnaba, R. R., & Tumirin, T. (2024). Pengaruh Intensitas Modal Dan Tanggung Jawab Sosial Perusahaan Terhadap Penghindaran Pajak Dengan Ukuran Perusahaan Sebagai Variabel Pemoderasi. Jurnal Akuntansi Manado (JAIM), 575-586.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-12

How to Cite

Dalimunte, D. S., & Fitri, E. N. (2025). The Influence of Capital Intensity and Foreign Ownership on Tax Avoidance in Consumer Goods Industry Companies. Jurnal Multidisiplin Sahombu, 5(01), 358–369. Retrieved from https://ejournal.seaninstitute.or.id/index.php/JMS/article/view/6530