Colonial Legacy and Industrialization: Historical Determinants in the Formation of Local Government Institutions
Keywords:
colonialism, industrialization, local government, institutional capacity, governance.Abstract
This article examines the historical interaction between colonialism and industrialization as primary determinants in shaping the structure and performance of local governments in post colonial countries. Based on comparative studies and empirical literature, the findings reveal that both direct and indirect colonial models, along with the degree of industrialization, significantly influence fiscal capacity, public participation, and the level of centralization in local governance. Countries with an indirect colonial legacy and early industrialization tend to develop more adaptive and inclusive local governments, whereas direct colonial models without accompanying industrialization tend to reinforce centralization and weaken institutional capacity. These findings underscore that contemporary local institutional designs cannot be fully understood without considering the structural legacies of the colonial and industrialization periods.
Downloads
References
Acemoglu, D., García-Jimeno, C., & Robinson, J. A. (2019). State capacity and economic development: A network approach. American Economic Review, 109(4), 1155–1209. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20161455
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2001). The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation. American Economic Review, 91(5), 1369–1401. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.5.1369
Abdulai, A.-G., & Crawford, G. (2023). Decentralisation, neoliberalism and the politics of local government reform in Ghana. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 61(1), 89–112. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022278X2300002X
Baldwin, K. (2016). The paradox of traditional chiefs in democratic Africa. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316687121
Boone, C. (2003). Political topographies of the African state: Territorial authority and institutional choice. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615576
Dell, M., & Olken, B. A. (2020). The development effects of the extractive colonial economy: The Dutch cultivation system in Java. Review of Economic Studies, 87(1), 164–203. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdz001
Denters, B., Ladner, A., & Rose, L. E. (2024). Size and local democracy: The challenge of a comparative perspective. Local Government Studies, 50(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2023.2167405
Denters, B., & Rose, L. E. (2020). Comparing local governance: Trends and developments. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40161-1
Evans, P. (1995). Embedded autonomy: States and industrial transformation. Princeton University Press.
Faguet, J. P. (2014). Decentralization and governance. World Development, 53, 2–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.002
Hariri, J. G. (2012). The autocratic legacy of early statehood. American Political Science Review, 106(3), 471–494. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305541200027X
Heinelt, H., & Kübler, D. (2024). The new comparative local governance: Institutions, actors, and reform in a multilevel context. Palgrave Macmillan.
Hooghe, L., Marks, G., & Schakel, A. H. (2010). The rise of regional authority: A comparative study of 42 democracies. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203869207
Iyer, L. (2010). Direct versus indirect colonial rule in India: Long-term consequences. Review of Economics and Statistics, 92(4), 693–713. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00023
Kübler, D., & Heinelt, H. (2023). Decentralization and urban governance: Assessing the effects of metropolitan reforms. Urban Affairs Review, 59(2), 371–399. https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874221134002
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1999). The quality of government. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 15(1), 222–279. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/15.1.222
Ladner, A., Keuffer, N., & Baldersheim, H. (2022). Patterns of local autonomy in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86129-3
Ladner, A., Keuffer, N., & Baldersheim, H. (2023). Local autonomy index: Measuring decentralisation and local self-government in a comparative perspective. Regional & Federal Studies, 33(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2022.2154517
Lange, M. (2009). Lineages of despotism and development: British colonialism and state power. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470704.001.0001
Leftwich, A. (2000). States of development: On the primacy of politics in development. Polity Press.
Lefèvre, C. (2021). Decentralization and local government reform in France: Trajectories and constraints. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 87(3), 466–483. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852319898489
Mahoney, J. (2010). Colonialism and postcolonial development: Spanish America in comparative perspective. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807056
Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. (2010). Explaining institutional change: Ambiguity, agency, and power. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511806417
Mamdani, M. (1996). Citizen and subject: Contemporary Africa and the legacy of late colonialism. Princeton University Press.
Michalopoulos, S., & Papaioannou, E. (2013). Pre-colonial ethnic institutions and contemporary African development. Econometrica, 81(1), 113–152. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA9897
Pierre, J. (2020). Multilevel governance as a strategy to build capacity in cities: Evidence from Sweden. Journal of Urban Affairs, 42(1), 20–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2018.1550575
Pierson, P. (2004). Politics in time: History, institutions, and social analysis. Princeton University Press.
Pritchett, L., & Woolcock, M. (2004). Solutions when the solution is the problem: Arraying the disarray in development. World Development, 32(2), 191–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2003.08.009
Rodden, J. (2004). Comparative federalism and decentralization: On meaning and measurement. Comparative Politics, 36(4), 481–500. https://doi.org/10.2307/4150164
Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Sandall, R. (2008). From identity to the economy: Analyzing the evolution of the decentralization discourse. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 26(1), 54–72. https://doi.org/10.1068/c56m
Rodrik, D. (2007). One economics, many recipes: Globalization, institutions, and economic growth. Princeton University Press.
Rodrik, D. (2008). Industrial policy: Don’t ask whether, ask how. Middle East Development Journal, 1(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793812009000024
Shah, A. (2012). Local governance in developing countries. World Bank Publications. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/5105c688-1c3c-5307-84e2-26fdb62f1423
Smoke, P. (2015). Rethinking decentralization: Assessing challenges to a popular public sector reform. Public Administration and Development, 35(2), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1703
Smoke, P. (2020). Decentralization and the global financial crisis: The impact on local governance and service delivery in developing countries. In N. Venkatachalam (Ed.), Public sector reform in developing countries (pp. 137–160). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003037920-9
Treisman, D. (2007). The architecture of government: Rethinking political decentralization. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490876
World Bank. (2022). Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI). https://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/
