The Influence of Learning Styles and Kolb Preferences on Training Effectiveness at the Learning and Behavior Level (Kirkpatrick Model): a Study at PT. Revass Utama Medika

Authors

  • Abdul Fattah Master of Management, Bakrie University Jakarta
  • Arief Bimantoro Suharko Lecturers of Master of Management, Bakrie University Jakarta

Keywords:

Kolb's learning styles, learning preferences, training effectiveness, Kirkpatrick Level 2, Kirkpatrick Level 3, PLS-SEM

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the influence of Kolb's learning style on the effectiveness of Customer Management training for employees of the Sales Division of PT. Revass Utama Medika, as measured through two levels of Kirkpatrick evaluation, namely Level 2 (learning) and Level 3 (behavior), and considering the role of learning preferences as a moderating variable. This study used a total population sampling method on 58 respondents, all of whom were training participants. Data collection was conducted one week after the online training, using a Likert-scale questionnaire instrument. Data analysis was carried out using the Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) method. The results showed that Kolb's learning style had a positive and significant effect on material understanding (Level 2) with a p value <0.05, but did not have a significant effect on changes in work behavior (Level 3). Conversely, learning preferences had a positive and significant effect on changes in work behavior (p <0.05). The moderating effect of learning preferences on the relationship between learning styles and work behavior was not significant (p > 0.05). These findings indicate that matching training methods to individual preferences contributes to the application of training outcomes in the workplace, while learning styles play a greater role in shaping understanding of the material. This study provides theoretical contributions by integrating Kolb's learning style model and Kirkpatrick's training evaluation into a single analytical framework, as well as practical contributions to human resource management in designing training that adapts to employee learning styles.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alrawashdeh, T. A. (2012). Factors Affecting Acceptance of Web-Based Training Systems: Using Extended Link and Structural Equation Modeling. International Journal of Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.5121/ijcseit.2012.2205

Angrosino, M. (2011). Doing Ethnographic and Observational Research. In Doing Ethnographic and https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208932 Observational Research.

Armstrong, M. (2006). A Handbook of HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PRACTICE 10TH EDITION. In Kogan Page. Bandura, A. (2010). Self-efficacy -Bandura. The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology.

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173 1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173

C. Bogdan sari knopp biklen, R. (2006). Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theories and Methods, Fifth Edition 5th Edition. Qualitative Research for Education.

Chin, W. (1998). The Partial Least Squares Approach to SEM chapter. Modern Methods for Business Research.

Chou, H. W., & Wang, T. Bin. (2000). Influence of learning style and training method on self-efficacy and learning performance in WWW homepage design training. International Journal of Information Management, 20(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0268-4012(00)00040-2

Fiol, C. M., & Lyles, M. A. (1985). Organizational Learning. The Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 803. https://doi.org/10.2307/258048

Nabila, G., Yaskun, M., Novitasari, D. A., & Syairozi, M. I. (2025, July). THE INFLUENCE OF BRAND AMBASSADOR AND BRAND AWARENESS ON PURCHASE DECISION MEDIATED BY PURCHASE INTENTION OF TOSTOS TORTILLA PRODUCTS X NCT DREAM (A STUDY ON NCT DREAM FANS IN LAMONGAN REGENCY). In NICEBIS: National Innovation Conference on Economics and Business (Vol. 1, No. 1).

Neno, M. S., Jehamat, L., Jelahut, Y. E., & Aman, D. K. T. (2023). Exploration of Community Empowerment in Koanara Village as the Entrance to the Kelimutu National Park. Journal of Business Management and Economic Development JBMED, 1(02), 298-306.

Hair Jr., J.F., Matthews, L.M., Matthews, R.L., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of Multivariate Data https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmda.2017.10008574

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2002). Learning Together and Alone: Overview and Meta‐analysis. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/0218879020220110

Ketchen, D.J. (2013). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. Long Range https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2013.01.002 Planning, 46(1–2).

Kirkpatrick, D., & Kirkpatrick, J. (2006). Evaluating training programs: The four levels. Berrett-Koehler Publishers. Armstrong, M. (2006). A Handbook of HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PRACTICE 10TH EDITION. In Kogan Page.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-21

How to Cite

Abdul Fattah, & Arief Bimantoro Suharko. (2025). The Influence of Learning Styles and Kolb Preferences on Training Effectiveness at the Learning and Behavior Level (Kirkpatrick Model): a Study at PT. Revass Utama Medika. Jurnal Multidisiplin Sahombu, 5(5), 1658–1666. Retrieved from https://ejournal.seaninstitute.or.id/index.php/JMS/article/view/7235