Legal Reconstruction of Hoax Regulation Concerning Drugs, Supplements, and Herbal Claims for Influenza A (H3n2) on Social Media Platforms
Keywords:
Legal Reconstruction; Hoax Regulation; Influenza A (H3N2); Drugs; Supplements; Herbal Remedies; Social Media; Health Law.Abstract
The widespread circulation of false information concerning drugs, supplements, and herbal remedies claiming to cure or prevent Influenza A (H3N2) on social media has become a serious legal and public health concern in Indonesia. The uncontrolled dissemination of such hoaxes not only misleads the public but also potentially endangers human health and undermines the credibility of legitimate medical institutions. Despite existing legal frameworks under the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (ITE Law) and Health Law, the regulatory approach to health-related misinformation remains fragmented and reactive. This study aims to analysed and reconstruct the legal framework governing the dissemination of hoax information related to drugs, supplements, and herbal treatments for Influenza A (H3N2) through social media. Using a juridical-normative method combined with a conceptual and statutory approach, this research examines the intersection between criminal law, health law, and cyber law. Primary data sources include relevant legislation such as Law No. 19 of 2016 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE Law), Law No. 36 of 2009 concerning Health, and related criminal provisions in the Indonesian Penal Code (KUHP). The results indicate that current regulations are insufficient in addressing the complexity of digital misinformation in the health sector. The absence of specific provisions regarding health-related hoaxes causes interpretative ambiguity, weak enforcement, and limited deterrent effect. Therefore, a legal reconstruction is required—integrating clearer definitions, proportional sanctions, and preventive mechanisms under a unified legal framework. This reconstruction should emphasize three key aspects: (1) strengthening regulatory coordination between health and communication authorities, (2)establishing clear accountability for content creators and distributors, and (3) developing digital literacy and early detection systems for health misinformation. The study concludes that reconstructing hoax regulations within the context of health communication is crucial to achieving legal certainty, public protection, and national health security.
Downloads
References
(1)Arief, B. N. (2010). Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana: Perkembangan Penyusunan Konsep KUHP Baru. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
(2)Departemen Komunikasi dan Informatika Republik Indonesia. (2019). Pedoman Penanganan Konten Hoaks dan Disinformasi di Media Sosial. Jakarta: Kominfo.
(3)Lamintang, P. A. F. (1997). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Citra Aditya Bakti.
(4)Mahfud, M. D. (2011). Politik Hukum di Indonesia. Rajawali Press.
(5)Nawawi Arief, B. (2012). Masalah Penegakan Hukum dan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan.Kencana Prenada Media Group.
(6)Republik Indonesia. (2008). Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (ITE Law). Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2008 Nomor 58.
(7)Republik Indonesia. (2016). Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2016 Nomor 251.
(8)Republik Indonesia. (1981). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP). Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1981 Nomor 76.
(9)Soekanto, S. (1983). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. Rajawali Press.
(10)Sudarto. (1986). Hukum dan Hukum Pidana. Alumni.
(11)Syahrani, R. (1999). Rangkuman Intisari Ilmu Hukum. Citra Aditya Bakti.
(12)United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2019). Cybercrime and Digital Evidence: Emerging Challenges in Law Enforcement. Vienna: United Nations Publication.
(13)World Health Organization (WHO). (2023). Influenza A (H3N2) – Global Situation Update. Retrieved from https://www.who.int
(14)Yuliandri. (2013). Asas-Asas Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan yang Baik: Gagasan Pembentukan Undang-Undang Berkelanjutan. Rajawali Press.
(15) Widya, H., & Alam, H. (2025). A Critical Study Of Contractor Liability in The Perspective of Maqashid Sharia And Islamic Contract Law. International Journal of Economic, Technology and Social Sciences (Injects), 6(1), 37-44.
(16) Widya H et al (2025) A Cyber Security And Protection Of Privacy Rights In E-Commerce Transactions. INFOKUM, 13(02), 481-495.











