Sustainable Development Strategy of Dolok Sembelin Protected Forest: a Case Study in Pasir Tengah Village, Tanah Pinem District, Dairi Regency, Indonesia
Keywords:
community behavior; government policy; forest management; protected forest; and environmental conservation.Abstract
This study aims to examine community behavior in the development and management of protected forests in Pasir Tengah Village, Tanah Pinem District, Dairi Regency. The research employs a qualitative method with a phenomenological approach to explore community experiences and perspectives regarding protected forest policies and management practices. The research informants consist of local government officials and community members directly involved in forest management activities. Data were collected through literature review, field observations, in-depth interviews, and documentation, and were analyzed using the interactive model of Miles and Huberman, which includes data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The findings indicate that the community plays an active role in the planning and management of protected forests by utilizing natural resources in a limited, controlled, and sustainable manner. The study also highlights the crucial role of the government in ensuring effective supervision and implementing appropriate policies to prevent forest degradation and promote sustainable forest governance. These findings are expected to provide practical and theoretical contributions to improving protected forest management and enhancing community welfare through sustainable environmental conservation.
Downloads
References
Arief, A. (2001). ForestlAndlForestrylanl. Rightlisius. Scholar google.co.id.
Agrawal, A., & Gibson, C. C. (1999). Enchantment and disenchantment: The role of community in natural resource conservation. World Development, 27(4), 629–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00161-2
Arnold, J. E. M. (2001). Forestry, poverty and aid. CIFOR Occasional Paper No. 33. Center for International Forestry Research.
Berkes, F. (2012). Sacred ecology (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Folke, C. (2000). Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecological Applications, 10(5), 1251–1262. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010
Charnley, S., & Poe, M. R. (2007). Community forestry in theory and practice. Annual Review of Anthropology, 36, 301–336. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123149
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
Creswell. (2010). Peen MethodlelitelQualitative (Theory & PanltwolPractical AnlQualitative Data Analysis). Medanl:Mifanlin ManlDigital Self.
FAO. (2020). Global forest resources assessment 2020. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
FAO. (2015). Sustainable Forest Management and Climate Change. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization.
IPCC. (2021). Climate Change and Land. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
Ministry of Environment and Forestry. (2022). Indonesia Forestry Statistics. Jakarta.
UNEP. (2020). Forest Ecosystems and Sustainable Development. United Nations Environment Programme.
Pahlevianlnlur, M., De Grave, A., NLur Saputra, D., Mardianlto, D., & Sinlthanlia, D. (2022). Research methodologylelitelqualitative(Edition 1). CV. Pradinla Group Library.
Soenldjoto, MA, Riefanli, MK, Triwibowo, D., & NLOvie, M. (2015). Wildlife in the reclamation area of PT Adaro IndonesialdonlAsia, KalimantanltanlSouthlylanlg revegetated lesslg of two yearsl. In Seminarlar NLasionlal Konlconservation andlPemanlfatanlSource Dayla Nature.











