Optimizing The Role Of Artificial Intelligence Technology In The Prevention And Enforcement Of Criminal Law: An Indonesian Legal Perspective
Kata Kunci:
Artificial Intelligence, Criminal Law, Law Enforcement, Crime PreventionAbstrak
The development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has brought significant changes to the Indonesian criminal law system. This research aims to examine the implementation of AI in the prevention and enforcement of criminal law, with a focus on normative juridical analysis of the integration of advanced technology in the justice system. The research method uses a normative juridical approach through literature study. Data were collected from primary and secondary legal sources and literature related to the implementation of AI in criminal law. Data analysis was conducted qualitatively to explore the potential and challenges of using AI. The results showed that AI has significant potential to increase the effectiveness of crime prevention through predictive analysis and law enforcement through digital evidence processing. This technology can help identify criminal patterns, track criminals, and support judicial administrative processes. However, its implementation requires a comprehensive regulatory framework to address ethical issues, privacy, and potential algorithm bias. The research identified the need for human resource development and adaptation to the local cultural context. Conclusions emphasize AI as a support tool, not a replacement for the justice system. It has the potential to improve efficiency, but cannot replace moral considerations and human conscience in upholding justice.
Unduhan
Referensi
Achmad, M. F., & Yulianto. (2010). Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Chen, B. M., & Li, Z. (2020). How will technology change the face of Chinese justice? Colum. J. Asian L., 34, 1. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.7916/CJAL.V34I1.7484
Disemadi, H. S. (2021). Urgensi Regulasi Khusus dan Pemanfaatan Artificial Intelligence dalam Mewujudkan Perlindungan Data Pribadi di Indonesia. Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika, 5(2), 177–199. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.25072/jwy.v5i2.460
Egbert, S., & Krasmann, S. (2020). Predictive Policing: Not Yet, but Soon Preemptive? Policing and Society, 30(8), 905–919. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2019.1611821
Fahrudin, N. (2018). Penerapan Metode Finite State Machine Pada Game Adventure “Franco”. JATI (Jurnal Mahasiswa Teknik Informatika), 2(1), 446–453. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.36040/jati.v2i1.1703
Fajar, M., & Achmad, Y. (2010). Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Haris, M. T. A. R., & Tantimin. (2022). Analisis Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Pidana Terhadap Pemanfaatan Artificial Intelligence Di Indonesia. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH), 8(1), 307–316. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.23887/jkh.v8i1.44408
Prima, E. (2018). Studi: AI Lebih Akurat Temukan Masalah Hukum Dibanding Pengacara. Retrieved 18 January 2025, from https://www.tempo.co/sains/studi-ai-lebih-akurat- temukan-masalah-hukum-dibanding-pengacara-967280
Soekanto, S. (2004). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Soekanto, S., & Mahmudji, S. (2003). Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Suatu Tinjauan Singkat.
Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Yudoprakoso, P. W. (2019). Kecerdasan Buatan (Artificial Intelligence) Sebagai Alat Bantu
Proses Penyusunan Undang-Undang Dalam Upaya Menghadapi Revolusi Industri 4.0 Di Indonesia. Simposium Hukum Indonesia, 1(1), 450–461.
