IMPLEMENTATION OF PROVISION OF LEGAL ASSISTANCE FOR SUSPECTS AT YOGYAKARTA POLICE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58471/justi.v12i1.15Keywords:
Legal Aid, Suspect, Legal StudiesAbstract
This study aims to describe (1) the implementation of providing legal aid for suspects at the Yogyakarta Police, (2) the obstacles encountered in the implementation of the provision of legal aid, and (3) efforts to overcome obstacles in the implementation of providing legal aid for suspect at the Yogyakarta Police. This research is a descriptive study with a qualitative research method approach. Research subjects were determined by purposive technique. The research subjects are the Deputy for Criminal Investigation, Police Investigator, Head of Investigative Unit I, Head of Operational Development Affairs and legal advisors as legal aid providers. Data were collected by interview and documentation methods. The results of this study indicate that the implementation of providing legal assistance for suspects who are poor and threatened with imprisonment for five years or more is when the Police, especially the investigators carry out their obligations as regulated in the Criminal Procedure Code, in particular Articles 54 and 56. the suspect at the Yogyakarta Police, namely the limited funds for the implementation of the provision of Legal Aid at the Yogyakarta Police, namely Rp. 3,000,000.00 per case when it should be Rp. 5,000,000.00 per case, the availability of Legal Aid Providers at Poresta Yogyakarta is not yet sufficient, there are some investigators who do not understand about the provision of legal aid for indigent (poor) suspects. Efforts in overcoming obstacles in the implementation of providing legal assistance for suspects at the Yogyakarta Police, namely,
References
L. M. Taufik, “IMPLEMENTASI BANTUAN HUKUM BAGI MASYARAKAT MISKIN (STUDI KASUS DI PENGADILAN AGAMA MATARAM),” J. IUS Kaji. Huk. dan Keadilan, vol. 5, no. 3, 2017, doi: 10.29303/ius.v5i3.430.
Y. B. Salamor, “PEMBERIAN BANTUAN HUKUM KEPADA MASYARAKAT MISKIN DI KOTA AMBON,” J. Muara Ilmu Sos. Humaniora, dan Seni, vol. 2, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.24912/jmishumsen.v2i1.1681.
A. Asnatuti and I. Ibrahim, “PERAN PENASEHAT HUKUM DALAM MEMBANTU TERSANGKA PADA PENYIDIKAN GUNA TERCIPTANYA PROSES HUKUM YANG ADIL,” Leg. J. Huk., vol. 10, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.33087/legalitas.v10i1.157.
F. W. Authon, “Dasar Yuridis Pemberian Kuasa dalam Layanan Bantuan Hukum,” J. Huk. Pembang., vol. 17, no. 6, 2017, doi: 10.21143/jhp.vol17.no6.1384.
N. Nazaruddin, H. Djalil, and M. N. Rasyid, “Perlindungan Hak Asasi Tersangka Dalam Penyidikan Kepolisian (Studi Kasus di Polres Pidie),” Syiah Kuala Law J., vol. 1, no. 2, 2017, doi: 10.24815/sklj.v1i2.8478.
O. W. Budijanto, “Peningkatan Akses Bantuan Hukum Kepada Masyarakat Miskin,” J. Penelit. Huk. Jure, vol. 16, no. 4, 2017.
L. Arliman S, “PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM UMKM DARI EKSPLOITASI EKONOMI DALAM RANGKA PENINGKATAN KESEJAHTERAAN MASYARAKAT,” J. Rechts Vinding Media Pembin. Huk. Nas., vol. 6, no. 3, 2017, doi: 10.33331/rechtsvinding.v6i3.194.
D. Rahmat, “IMPLEMENTASI KEBIJAKAN PROGRAM BANTUAN HUKUM BAGI MASYARAKAT TIDAK MAMPU DI KABUPATEN KUNINGAN,” UNIFIKASI J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 4, no. 1, 2017, doi: 10.25134/unifikasi.v4i1.478.
L. M. Pangaribuan, “BANTUAN HUKUM DALAM PROSES PERADILAN PIDANA,” J. Huk. Pembang., vol. 17, no. 1, 2017, doi: 10.21143/jhp.vol17.no1.1223.
M. Shohibuddin, E. Cahyono, and A. D. Bahri, “Undang-Undang Desa dan Isu Sumberdaya Alam: Peluang Akses atau Ancaman Eksklusi?,” Wacana, vol. 19, no. 36, 2017.