Law Enforcement For Commitment Making Officials Who Make Overpayments For Procurement of Goods/Services Without Mens Rea
Keywords:
Commitment Making Officials, Advantages, Payment, Procurement, Goods/ServicesAbstract
Law enforcement in cases of criminal acts of corruption, including in the field of procurement of goods/services, must be carried out firmly and massively but measurably by prioritizing the principle of objectivity and the principles of justice and benefit. Law enforcement based on statutory regulations in the field of criminal acts of corruption should be imposed on perpetrators who truly have evil intentions (mens rea) to commit corruption. Law enforcement that does not pay attention to this aspect will result in concerns or even fear for implementing officials who make decisions, including Commitment Making Officials (PPK) in the procurement of goods/services that do not have a mens rea, that their actions could at any time be criminalized. This research aims to analyze legal enforcement for PPK who make overpayments for procurement of goods/services without mens rea and to analyze legal protection for PPK due to overpayments for procurement of goods/services without mens rea. The method used in this research is normative legal research which is carried out by examining primary legal materials as well as secondary legal materials relating to the legal issues being studied. Data was collected through document study or library research and analyzed through a qualitative approach. The research results show that law enforcement for PPK who make overpayments for procurement of goods/services can be carried out through state administrative law mechanisms or through criminal law mechanisms. The research results also show that in several cases, law enforcement based on the Corruption Crime Law was imposed on PPK who were not proven to have the mens rea to commit corruption. Legal protection for PPK due to excess payments for procurement of goods/services without mens rea has been provided by the state through a set of regulations in the field of procurement of goods/services, including as regulated in Article 84 of Presidential Regulation Number 16 of 2018 concerning Government Procurement of Goods/Services as amended by Presidential Regulation Number 12 of 2021 provides legal services to those involved in procuring goods/services in dealing with legal problems related to the procurement of goods/services provided from the investigation process to the court decision stage.
References
Anggara, Sahyaa. (2018). Hukum Administrasi Negara. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.
Anandya, Diky., Easter, Lalola and Ramadhana, Kurnia. (2021). Hasil Pemantauan Tren Penindakan Kasus Korupsi Semester I 2021,
https://antikorupsi.org/sites/default/files/dokumen/Laporan%20Hasil%20Pemantauan%20Tren%20Vonis%20Tahun%202021.pdf diakses pada tanggal 18 Juni 2023 Jam 6.30 WIB.
Atmadja, I Dewa Gede & Budiartha, I Nyoman Putu. (2018). Teori-Teori Hukum. Malang: Setara Press.
Atmasasmita, Romli. (2017). Rekonstruksi Asas Tiada Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan (Geen Straf Zonder Schuld). Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Chandra, Tofik Yanuar & Putra, Yasmon. (2022). Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: PT. Sangir Multi Usaha.
Cristianata. (2017). Aspek Hukum Pidana Dalam Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa. Tanggerang: Lestari Dayak.
Huda, Chairul. (2011) Dari Tiada Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan Menuju Kepada Tiada Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan. Jakarta: Kencana.
Humas BPHN. (2023). Indeks Persepsi Korupsi Indonesia Turun Lagi, Penegakan Hukum Tipikor Perlu Dikaji Ulang?,
https://bphn.go.id/publikasi/berita/2023031603084646/indeks-persepsi-korupsi-indonesia-turun-lagi-penegakan-hukum-tipikor-perlu-dikaji-ulang, diakses pada tanggal 2 Januari 2024 Jam 20.15 WIB.
Kombong, E. P., Nugroho, A. S. B., & Wibowo, R. A. (2020). Pelayanan Publik dan Kajian Putusan Korupsi Pengadaan Jasa Konstruksi dalam Perspektif Kontrak Jasa Konstruksi: Civil Engineering Perspective. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 6(2), 245-262.
KPK. (2024). Statistik TPK Berdasarkan Jenis Perkara,
https://www.kpk.go.id/id/statistik/penindakan/tpk-berdasarkan-jenis-perkara, diakses pada tanggal 3 Juni 2023 Jam 08.20 WIB.
KPK. (2024). Statistik TPK Berdasarkan Profesi/Jabatan,
https://www.kpk.go.id/id/statistik/penindakan/tpk-berdasarkan-profesi-jabatan, diakses pada tanggal 3 Juni 2023 Jam 08.30 WIB.
Mochtar, Zainal Arifin & Hiariej, Eddy O.S. (2021). Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Hukum, Memahami Kaidah, Teori, Asas dan Filsafat Hukum. Penerbit.
Purwosusilo. (2017). Aspek Hukum Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa. Jakarta: Kencana.
Putra, M. A. A. (2021). Bentuk Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Pejabat Pemerintah yang Tidak Dapat Dipidana. Justisi, 7(2), 118-136.
Peraturan Presiden Nomor 16 Tahun 2018 tentang Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah.
Peraturan Presiden Nomor 12 Tahun 2021 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Presiden Nomor 16 Tahun 2018 tentang Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah.
Putusan Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi pada Pengadilan Tinggi Surabaya Nomor 16/PID.SUS-TPK/2022/PT SBY tanggal 13 April 2022
Putusan Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi pada Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya Nomor 86/Pid.Sus-TPK/2021/PN Sby tanggal 2 Februari 2021.
Putusan Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi pada Pengadilan Negeri Bengkulu Nomor 34 /PID.SUS- TPK/2020/ PN Bgl tanggal 29 Maret 2021.
Putusan Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi pada Pengadilan Negeri Medan Nomor 26/Pid.Sus-TPK/2022/PN Mdn tanggal 25 Juli 2022.
Raharjo, Satjipto. (1982). Hukum Masyarakat dan Pembangunan. Bandung: Alumni.
Rosyadi, Imron. (2022). Hukum Pidana. Surabaya: Revka Prima Media.
Suryaningsi. (2018). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Mulawarman University Press, Samarinda, 2018.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2004 Tentang Perbendaharaan Negara.
