Implications Of The Multibar Concept On Containers Advocates Organization (Peradi) Based On Decision Supreme Court No. 73/KMA/HK.01/IX/2015
Keywords:
Multibar Concept, Advocate Organization, Supreme Court Decision of the Republic of IndonesiaAbstract
The purpose of this study is to determine the relationship between the issuance of Supreme Court Decision Number 73/KMA/HK.01/IX/2015 with the Multibar concept and to determine the negative impact of the Multibar concept if applied to the Advocate Organization in Indonesia. The problem in this study is because there has been a debate on the Supreme Court Decision Number 73/KMA/HK.01/IX/2015 which tends to favor the Multibar concept . This study uses the Normative Juridical method, namely analyzing problems through a legal principles approach that refers to legal norms contained in legislation. The results of the discussion, namely the issuance of the Supreme Court Decision Number 73/KMA/HK.01/IX/2015, show that if the decision is more in favor of the Multibar Concept, in this case it can certainly cause debate, chaos, violate higher laws, divide the Advocate Organization and can harm the Advocate profession.
References
Afandi, F. (2023). Menerapkan Standarisasi, Memperkuat Akuntabilitas dan Nilai-Nilai Ideal Profesi Addvokat : Studi Kelembagaan Orgaisasi Advokat Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Institute For Criminal Justice Reform .
Asyura, M. (2019). Kewenangan Ketua Mahkamah Agung Mengeluarkan Surat Keputusan Ketua Mahkamah Agung Nomor 73/KMA/HK.01/IX/2015 Perihal Penyumpahan Advokat. Law Jurnal, 442.
Atsar, A. (2018). Profesi Advokat Dan Tantangan Masa Depan. Tasikmalaya: Rumah Cemerlang.
Fatahuddin. (2022, Juni Rabu). PARE POS co.id. Retrieved Desember Senin, 2024, from parepos.fajar.co.id: https:parepos.fajar.co.id/2022/06/kai-tawarkan-konsep-multi-bar-sebagai-penyelesaian-masalah-advokat/amp/
Imam Ghozali, M. (2020). Transformasi Organisasi Advokat Indonesia dari Single Bar Menjadi MultiBar (Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 101/PPU-VII/2009 dan Surat Ketua Mahkamah Agung No. 73/KMA/HK.01/IX/2015). Mizan : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 72-82.
Lubis, F. (2021). Bunga Rampai Hukum Keadvokatan. Medan: FEBI PRESS.
Mahkamah Konstitusi RI. (2008). Putusan Nomor 22/PUU-VI/2008. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara.
Mahkamah Konstitusi RI. (2014). Putusan Nomor 112/PUU-XII/2014. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara.
Mahkamah Kosntitusi RI. (2009). Putusan Nomor 101/PUU-VII/2009. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara.
Manganju. (2023). Menelusuri Kendala Hukum Dalam Surat Ketua Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 73/KMA/HK.01/IX/2015 Tentang Pengambilan Sumpah Advokat Terhadap Organisasi Advokat Sebagai Satu-Satunya Wadah Menurut UU No. 18 Tahun 2003 Tentang Advokat. Jurnal Cahaya, 1126.
Presiden Republik Indonesia. (2003). Undang Undang Nomor 18 Tahun 2003 Tentang Advokat. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara .
Sulastri, L. (2020). Merajut Sistem Keorganisasian Advokat Di Indonesia. Purwokerto: CV Gracias Logis Kreatif.
Tsani, M. U. (2021). Tumpang Tindih Regulasi Advokat Di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum, 159.
Undang Undang Republik Indonesia . (2003). Nomor 18 Tahun 2003 Tentang Advokat. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara.
Wilkins, D. (2020). The Future of the Legal Profession: Challenges and Opportunities. Amerika Serikat: Harvard Law Review.
