Legal Protection for Consumers in the Parate Execution of Fiduciary Guarantee Objects
Keywords:
Legal Protection, Consumers, Fiduciary GuaranteeAbstract
This research addresses the problem of inadequate legal protection for consumers in the implementation of parate execution of fiduciary collateral objects. The study aims to examine regulations, transparency, and fair treatment of consumers within this context. Employing normative legal research through the analysis of legal literature and secondary data, the study explores the legal relationship between debtors and creditors in Consumer Finance Companies, highlighting the principle of freedom of contract under Article 1338 paragraph 1 of the Indonesian Civil Code. Findings indicate that parate execution must comply with consumer protection principles concerning security, safety, and legal certainty, as mandated by Law No. 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection. The research concludes that additional protections, such as requiring debtor agreement or court approval for execution, are necessary, alongside recommendations for legal education, enhanced government oversight, and stricter adherence to the principle of prudence in fiduciary collateral execution.
References
Panjaitan, Hulman. Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. 1st ed. Jakarta: Jala Permata Aksara, 2021.
Suwandono, Agus. “Ruang Lingkup Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen.” Perpustakaan UT (2020)
Ahmadin. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen Pada Perjanjian Jual Beli Sepeda Motor Studi Kasus Di Bima.” JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan) 5, no. 1 (2021): 258–267.
Apandy, Puteri Asyifa Octavia, Melawati, and Panji Adam. “Pentingnya Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen Dalam Jual Beli.” Jurnal Manajemen & Bisnis Jayakarta 3, no. 1 (2021): 12–18.
Daniel Panda, Ayu Riski Septiani. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen Dalam Penarikan Objek Jaminan Fidusia Oleh Perusahan.” Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukumusticia (2016): 1–23.
Fauzi, Muhamad Jiia, Deny Guntara, and Muhamad Abas. “Perlindungan Hukum Konsumen Dihubungkan Dengan Undang- Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2023 Tentang Pengembangan Dan Penguatan Sektor Keuangan ( Studi Putusan Nomor : 15 / Pdt . Sus- Bpsk / 2023 / Pn . Grt ).” Unes Law Review 6, no. 1 (2023): 1060–1067.
Jadidah, Fikrotul. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditur Terhadap Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia (Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No 18/Puu-Xvii/2019).” Iblam Law Review 2, no. 2 (2022): 17–37.
Junaedi, Budi, Merry Tjoanda, and Teng Berlianty. “Perlindungan Hukum Pada Debitur Atas Penarikan Objek Jaminan Fidusia Melalui Parate Eksekusi.” PATTIMURA Legal Journal 1, no. 2 (2022): 124–132.
Kurniawan, Nida Najla, Elang Rinjani Utara, Hafidz Setyo Susanto, and Samuel Hiskia Lumbanraja. “Analisis Kekuasaan Eksekutorial Di Indonesia Dalam Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Yang Dibebani Hak Tanggungan ( Putusan MA Nomor 3418 K / Pdt / 2019 ).” Diponegoro Private Law Review 8, no. 2 (2021): 116–131.
Mulyani, Sri. “Penyelesaian Hukum Terhadap Debitur Yang Melakukan Wanprestasi Pada Perjanjian Pembiayaan Konsumen.” Jurnal Sains Dan Seni ITS. Universitas Ageng Tritayasa, 2023.
Nababan, Roida. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen Akibat Penjualan Objek Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Perjanjian Pembiayaan.” Visi Sosial Humaniora 2, no. 2 (2021): 168–188.
Osawan, Rinaldi Aidil. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen Dalam Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia Oleh Perusahan Pembiayan Pasca Kelauarnya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019.” JOM x, no. 1 (2023).
Sanusi, Ahmad. “Pendaftaran Jaminan Fidusia Dan Akibat Hukumnya (Suatu Tinjauan Normatif).” Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum 7, no. 1 (2013): 73–84.
Tiami, Rini. “Posisi Undang Undang Perlindungan Konsumen Nomor 8 Tahun1999Dalam Upaya Perlindungan TerHadap Konsumen.” Private Law Review 1, no. May (2017): 352. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cbdv.200490137/abstract.
UUJF. “Uu No 42/1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusia.” Jdih, 1999.
Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen
