Laws of Evidence In The Resolution of State Administrative Disputes and Criminal Cases
Keywords:
Evidence, State Administrative Disputes, Criminal Cases, Procedural LawAbstract
In every dispute/case process that is resolved through the courts, evidence is basically needed, whether it occurs in the process of resolving state administrative disputes, civil cases, and criminal cases. The Law of Evidence in procedural law is very important because the task of evidence determines the truth in a conflict of interest. And on the basis of this evidence, the judge makes a decision to try to find the truth. The law of evidence in state administrative procedural law, criminal law which has a different object of dispute where in the process of resolving disputes/cases there are similarities and there are differences in the principles adopted. One of the similarities in the principles adopted, in the resolution of state administrative disputes/in state administrative court procedural law there is the principle of presumption of rechtmatieg which has the same meaning as the presumption of innocence in criminal procedural law. In making a decision by a judge after examining the evidence, there is a difference between a state administrative court judge in resolving state administrative disputes and a district court judge in resolving criminal cases. In administrative disputes, a judge may make a decision based on a minimum of two pieces of evidence according to the judge's belief and there is no absolute evidence, while in criminal cases, the judge's decision must have sufficient evidence according to the law, there must be witness testimony and the judge's belief.
References
Andi Hamzah, Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2019.
Indroharto 1993. Usaha memahami Undang-Undang Tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Buku I dan Buku II, Penerbit Pustaka Sinar Harapan , Jakarta Cetakan I
Sudikno Mertokusumo, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2016.
R. Wiyono, 2013 Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Edisi ke tiga, Sinar grafika Jakarta.
Rozali Abdullh. 1992 Hukum Acara Peradian Tata Usaha Negara, Penerbit Radjawali, Jakarta
Ridwan, 2002, HukumAdministrasi Negara, Penerbit UII Pres Yogyakarta.
Riawan Chandra, 2008, Hukum Administrasi Negara, Pene3rbit Universitas Atmajaya Yogyakarta
R. Wiyono, 2013 Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Edisi ke tiga, Sinar grafika Jakarta.
Sjachran Basah, 1997. Eksistensi dan Tolok Ukur Badan Peradilan Administrasi di Indonesia, Penerbit Alumni Bandung.
Sudikno Marto Kusumo. 2006, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, Edisi Ke Tujuh Penerbit Liberty Yogyakarta.
Teguh Samudera. Hukum Pembuktian Dalam Acara Perdata, Penerbit PT. Alumni ,Bandung 2004
Philipus M. Hadjon dkk, 1990 Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia, Penerbit Gajah Mada University Press Jogjakarta
Undang-undang No. 5 Tahun 1986, jo UU N0.09 Tahun 2004 Jo UU No. 51 Tahun 2009 Tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara.
Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP).
