Factors Causing the Occurrence of Embezzlement Crimes in Company Positions
Keywords:
Factors, Causes, Criminal Acts, Embezzlement in Positions, CompanyAbstract
The purpose of this research is to identify and analyze the factors causing embezzlement in office positions within companies. This type of research is normative with a legislative approach. The data used are secondary data consisting of primary and secondary legal materials. The research specification used is analytical descriptive. The factors causing embezzlement in office positions within companies are multidimensional, such as economic factors, opportunities arising from the position, and the weakness of the company's internal control system, which also contribute to embezzlement in office positions. The factor of abuse of trust also plays a role in the occurrence of embezzlement in office positions. Weak personal morals and integrity are also a contributing factor. The reasons why someone commits embezzlement in a position can include psychological factors, such as work stress, feeling undervalued, or conflicts with management, which can also influence a person's decision to commit embezzlement. A low understanding of the law and lack of awareness of criminal penalties are also causes of embezzlement in positions. Therefore, it is recommended that members of society refrain from doing it, as it harms both themselves and others.
References
Arief, Barda Nawawi. (2011). Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Kencana. hlm. 79.
Bonger, W.A. (2010). Pengantar Tentang Kriminologi. Jakarta: Pembangunan Nasional. hlm. 67.
Hamzah, Andi. (2012). Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika. hlm. 118.
I Komang Jemi Agus Wijaya et al., 2025, Criminal Liability of Perpetrators of Embezzlement in Office” Jurnal Terekam Jejak, 2025
Kiki Kristanto et al., (2025). Embezzlement in the Private Sector: Legal Challenges and Regulatory Gaps in Corporate Governance, Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies, 2025.
Lamintang, P.A.F. (2014). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
M. Yahya. Harahap, (2010). Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika. hlm. 45.
Moeljatno. (2008). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. hlm. 73.
Muladi. (2015). Kapita Selekta Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Semarang: Badan Penerbit UNDIP. hlm. 92.
Romli, Atmasasmita, (2010). Teori dan Kapita Selekta Kriminologi. Bandung: Refika Aditama. hlm. 102.
Soekanto, Soerjono. (2012). Sosiologi Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada. hlm. 128.
Soesilo, R. (1996). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) serta Komentar-Komentarnya. Bogor: Politeia.
Sudarto. (2009). Hukum dan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Alumni. hlm. 34.
Sutherland, Edwin H. (2014). Principles of Criminology. Jakarta: Kencana. hlm. 88.
Sutopo, et. al, 2024, Tindak Pidana Penggelapan Dalam Jabatan di Perusahaan Studi Kasus Putusan PN Nomor 2206/Pid. B/PN Sby, Jurnal Hukum Indonesia, Vol. 3, No. 4 Tahun 2024.











