Implementation Of Good Forest Governance In Forest Management In Indonesia

Yolamalinda Yolamalinda; Laili Fuji Widyawati; Asti Istiqomah

doi:10.58471/esaprom.v2i02.2248

Authors

Yolamalinda Yolamalinda PGRI University West Sumatra
Laili Fuji Widyawati Esa Unggul University
Asti Istiqomah Bogor Agricultural Institute

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58471/esaprom.v2i02.2248

Keywords:

e-government, corruption, governance, strategy

Abstract

Land cover in Indonesia's forest areas is dynamic and can change rapidly with factors including the conversion of forest areas for use in other sectors; unsustainable forest management; illegal logging; unsustainable mining activities; disturbance; and forest fires, ineffectiveness and failure to optimize reforestation and land rehabilitation have also contributed to an increase in the area of highly degraded land. Therefore, it is necessary to make significant improvements to the system and structure of forest governance to ensure that forest management is more sustainable and equitable, and not prone to corrupt practices. The aims of this paper are (a) to review the 2014 Forest Governance Index; (b) Analyzing the latest developments in Indonesia's Forest Performance; and (c) Analyze Indonesia's current e-government index and forest governance strategy. The results show that the transparency aspect is the weakest aspect in Indonesian forest governance in 2014 which indicates the need for systemic improvements to control the rate of deforestation and forest degradation related to corrupt practices. Currently, the government continues to make improvements and innovations in implementing good governance in the forestry sector. Forest management policies continue to meet new paradigms and national, regional and global strategic challenges such as meeting the demands of the SDG's and other international agreements. For Indonesia's e-government Development Index continues to experience improvement. For online service indexes, technology and service provision are the most important components to be improved. Meanwhile, for the telecommunication infrastructure index, the component of fixed broadband subscriptions is still weak. Steps to eradicate corruption through improving e-government can increase the effectiveness of regional development governance and performance.

Author Biographies

Yolamalinda Yolamalinda, PGRI University West Sumatra

Laili Fuji Widyawati, Esa Unggul University

Asti Istiqomah, Bogor Agricultural Institute

References

APHI/Asosiasi Pengusaha Hutan Indonesia. (2019). Roadmap Pengembangan Hutan Produksi 2019-2045. Asosiasi Pengusaha Hutan Indonesia. Bakar,

S.N. (2022). Indonesia’s FOLU Net Sink 2030: Inovasi Tata Kelola Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan. Pidato Pengukuhan Profesor Kehormatan dalam Bidang Ilmu Manajemen Sumber Daya Alam pada Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Brawijaya [Unpublished Manuscript]. Universitas Brawijaya. Bappenas,

KLHK & LIPI. (2016). IBSAP 2015- 2020, Bappenas, KLHK dan LIPI.

BBSDLP. (2011). Peta Lahan Gambut Indonesia Skala 1:250.000. Balai Besar Penelitian dan Pengembangan Sumberdaya Lahan Pertanian. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian, Kementerian Pertanian.

BBSDLP. (2019). Peta Lahan Gambut Indonesia Skala 1:50.000. Edisi Desember 2019. Besar Penelitian dan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Lahan Pertanian. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian.

BRGM. (2022). Hijaukan Mangrove, Pulihkan Gambut, Tingkatkan Kesejahteraan. Laporan Tahunan 2021. Badan Restorasi Gambut dan Mangrove.

Burung Indonesia. (2021). Infografis Status Burung di Indonesia 2021.

Breakey, H.; Cadman, T.; Sampford, C. Governance Values and Institutional Integrity. 2016. In Governing the Climate Change Regime. Routledge: Oxfordshire, UK : pp. 34–62.

Cadman, T. 2011. Quality and Legitimacy of Global Governance: Case Lessons from Forestry; Taylor & Francis: Abingdon, UK.

Ekawati S, Hariyanto D, Marinus KH, Handoyo, Fentie JS, Bayu S, Krisno DR. 2015. Sintesis Penelitian Integratif Penguatan Tata Kelola Kehutanan. Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan.

Hetemaki, L., 2019. The role of science in forest policy–Experiences by EFI. For. Policy Econ. 105, 10–16.

Hill, M. & Varone, F. (2021). The Public Policy Process. Routledge. Taylor & Francis Group.

ITTO & FAO. (2009). Forest governance and climate-change mitigation. Policy Brief.

Kaufmann, Daniel, Aart Kraay, and Massimo Mastruzzi. 2008. Governance matters VII: Aggregate and individual governanceindicators, 1996–2007. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4654, June 24, 2008.

KLHK. (2017). Sistem Informasi dan Data Indeks Kerentanan. Direktorat Adaptasi Perubahan Iklim, Direktorat Jenderal Pengendalian Perubahan Iklim, Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan.

KLHK. (2021a). Deforestasi Indonesia Tahun 2019-2020. Direktorat Inventarisasi dan Pemantauan Sumber Daya Hutan, Direktorat Jenderal Planologi Kehutanan dan Tata Lingkungan.

KLHK. (2021b). Rekalkulasi Penutupan Lahan Indonesia Tahun 2020. Direktorat Inventarisasi dan Pemantauan Sumber Daya Hutan.

KLHK. (2021c). Laporan Inventarisasi Gas Rumah Kaca, Monitoring, Pelaporan, dan Verifikasi Nasional Tahun 2021. Direktorat Jenderal Pengendalian Perubahan Iklim. Direktorat Inventarisasi GRK dan Monitoring, Pelaporan, Verifikasi.

KLHK. (2021d). Operational Plan of Indonesia FOLU Net Sink 2030. Directorate General of Forestry Planning and Environmental Governance.

KLHK. (2022a). Direktorat Pengendalian Kerusakan Ekosistem Gambut, Direktorat Jenderal Pengendalain Pencemaran dan Kerusakan Lingkungan.

KLHK. (2022b). Statistik Direktorat Jenderal Pengelolaan Daerah Aliran Sungai dan Rehabilitasi Hutan Tahun 2021. Direktorat Jenderal Pengelolaan Daerah Aliran Sungai dan Rehabilitasi Hutan. Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan.

KLHK (2022c)Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan. The State of Indonesia’s Forests 2022 Towards FOLU Net Sink 2030.

Lemos, M.C. & Agrawal, A. (2006). Environmental Governance. Annual Review of Environment and Resource, 31(1), 297-325.

Luintel, H.; Bluffstone, R.A.; Scheller, R.M. 2018. The effects of the Nepal community forestry program on biodiversity conservation and carbon storage. PLoS ONE, 13, e0199526.

Meyer et al. 2002. The Pyramid. A diagnostic and planning tool for good forest governance. Worls bank dan WWF. IIED.

Ostrom, E. 2010. Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change 20(4):550-557. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/abs/pii/S0959378010000634

Syaufina. 2015. Research Status on the Relationship between Forest Fire and Biodiversity and Human Dimension in Indonesia. In: Damayanti EK, Fernandez JC, editors. Proceedings of the National Seminar on Promoting Research on Forest and Land Fire Mitigation, Adaptation and Impact to Human and Biodiversity, held in BogorIndonesia, April 28, 2015. Bogor (ID): SEAMEO BIOTROP.

The Ministry of Environment and Forestry (2016). National Forest Reference

[UN] United Nations. 2023. UN E-Government Knowledgebase. [Diakses 20 Mei 2023]. https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Data/Country-Information/id/78-Indonesia

UNEP (2009). Environmental Governance, A Fact Sheet provided for 2009 UNFCCC Conference in Copenhagen. United Nations Environment Programme.

UNDP Indonesia. 2015. Indeks Tata Kelola Hutan Indonesia 2014. UNDP Indonesia.

Emission Level for Deforestation and Forest Degradation: In the Context of Decision 1/CP.16 para 70 UNFCCC (Encourages developing country Parties to contribute to mitigation actions in the forest sector): Post Technical Assessment by UNFCCC. Directorate General of Climate Change. The Ministry of Environment and Forestry.