The Urgency of Regulations Concerning the Bankruptcy of State-Owned Enterprises

Authors

  • Baitiya Muharrami Ardinuri Universitas Airlangga, Jl.Airlaga No. 4-6, Airlangga, Kec. Gubeng, Surabaya
  • Natasya Augustine Rixstriwati Universitas Airlangga, Jl.Airlaga No. 4-6, Airlangga, Kec. Gubeng, Surabaya
  • Akmal Fata Mursidin Universitas Airlangga, Jl.Airlaga No. 4-6, Airlangga, Kec. Gubeng, Surabaya
  • Radyananda Argo Herlambang Universitas Airlangga, Jl.Airlaga No. 4-6, Airlangga, Kec. Gubeng, Surabaya
  • M. Ade Dharma Praja Universitas Airlangga, Jl.Airlaga No. 4-6, Airlangga, Kec. Gubeng, Surabaya

Keywords:

Bankruptcy, State-Owned Enterprises, Persero, State Assets.

Abstract

Bankruptcy of State-Owned Enterprises (BUMN Persero) The chosen theme is motivated by the absence of regulations regarding limitations on bankruptcy petitions for BUMN Persero, which has caused differences in opinion leading to legal deviations in practice. Regulations on bankruptcy petitions for BUMN Persero can serve as a reference, but they must still be adjusted considering the fundamental special characteristics of BUMN. The legal materials obtained by the author will be analyzed using descriptive and evaluative analysis techniques. In this regard, the author collects legal materials such as legislation and also conducts source searches on the internet by accessing official sites like e-books, e-journals, or official articles published online. Based on the research using the above methods, the author finds that there are philosophical, juridical, and sociological urgencies that make regulations regarding bankruptcy petitions for BUMN Persero necessary. These regulations aim to prevent misinterpretations concerning the parameters of limitations on BUMN operating in the public interest sector, and banking regulations for BUMN Persero can prevent differences of opinion that result in legal deviations in practice. Law No. 37 of 2004 regulates bankruptcy of BUMN but does not clearly regulate bankruptcy petitions specifically for BUMN Persero, so it requires revision or additions. However, this law can be used as a reference in analyzing bankruptcy regulations for BUMN Persero. There are two models of bankruptcy petitions depending on the legal subject or the status of the company being petitioned for bankruptcy. It can be understood that bankruptcy petitions for BUMN Perum are filed by the Minister of Finance, whereas for BUMN Persero, if 100% or the entire share ownership is held by the State, the Minister of Finance can file the bankruptcy petition. However, if this is not applicable, the Bankruptcy Law does not apply because the Minister of Finance acts as the manager of State Assets.

References

Abdulkadir, M. (2010). Hukum Perusahaan Indonesia (2nd ed.). Citra Aditya Bakti. (Likely a book or textbook based on the title and publisher type)

Fuady, M. (2014). Hukum pailit dalam teori & praktek (Cet. 5). Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Harun, R. (2019). BUMN dalam sudut pandang tata negara: Privatisasi, holdingisasi, kontrol, dan pengawasan. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Harun, R. (2020). Hukum BUMN (Badan Hukum Milik Negara). Jakarta: Balai Pustaka. Hartini, R. (2017). BUMN Persero: Konsep keuangan negara dan hukum kepailitan di Indonesia. Malang: Setara Press.

Ibrahim, R. (1997). Prospek BUMN dan kepentingan umum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti. Kelsen, H. (1961). General theory of law and state (A. Wedberg, Trans.). New York: Russell & Russell.

Keynes, J. M. (1953). The general theory of employment, interest, and money. London: A. Harvest HBJ Book.

Manan, B. (1992). Dasar-dasar perundang-undangan Indonesia. Jakarta: IndHill.Co. Marzuki, P. M. (2010). Penelitian hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.

Muhhamad, A. (2010). Hukum perusahaan Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti. Fuady, M. (2014). Doktrin-doktrin modern dalam corporate law dan eksistensinya dalam hukum Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Rahayu, M. (2021). [No Title Provided in Text] (Based on the mention of expert Fred BG. Tumbuan, Rahayu is likely the author of a source citing Tumbuan).

Setyanto, W. (2021). [No Title Provided in Text] (Based on the introductory context).

Tumbuan, F. B. G. (1998). [No Title Provided in Text] (Based on the definition of bankruptcy attributed to him).

A. Artikel/Jurnal

Asri, A. (2017). Doktrin piercing the corporate veil dalam pertanggungjawaban direksi perseroan terbatas. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dirgantara, 8(1). Fakultas Hukum Universitas Dirgantara Marsekal Suryadarma.

Sentosa, S. P. (n.d.). Pembentukan holding company BUMN: Peluang dan tantangan. Diakses dari http://www.pacific.net.id/pakar/setyanto/tulisan.03.html

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2003 tentang Keuangan Negara. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2003 Nomor 47.

Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2003 tentang Badan Usaha Milik Negara.

Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2003 Nomor 70.

Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2004 Nomor 9.

Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2007 Nomor 106.

Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 13 Tahun 1998 tentang Perusahaan Umum (PERUM).

Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 45 Tahun 2001 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 12 Tahun 1998 tentang Perusahaan Perseroan (PERSERO).

Downloads

Published

2025-12-02

How to Cite

Baitiya Muharrami Ardinuri, Natasya Augustine Rixstriwati, Akmal Fata Mursidin, Radyananda Argo Herlambang, & M. Ade Dharma Praja. (2025). The Urgency of Regulations Concerning the Bankruptcy of State-Owned Enterprises. Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia (JIM-ID), 4(12), 1866–1874. Retrieved from https://ejournal.seaninstitute.or.id/index.php/esaprom/article/view/7558