Supervision of Village Funds by Local GovernmentMerauke Regency (Study in Jagebob District, Merauke Regency)

Frien’s Bernard Kramayir; Petrus Polyando; Devi Irena

Authors

Frien’s Bernard Kramayir Sekolah pascasarjana, Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri
Petrus Polyando Sekolah pascasarjana, Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri
Devi Irena Sekolah pascasarjana, Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri

Keywords:

Supervision, Village Fund Budget, Jagebob

Abstract

Study This aim For analyze form, mechanism, and effectiveness supervision Village Fund budget carried out by the Merauke Regency Regional Government, with focus on implementation in the District Jagebob. Supervision of Village Funds becomes aspect important in realizing governance transparent, accountable, and welfare - oriented government village community. District Jagebob chosen Because is one of the areas with sufficient number of villages many and facing diverse challenge in distribution as well as utilization of village funds, especially related capacity apparatus and coordination between party Research manager This use method descriptive qualitative with approach studies case. Data collected through interviews, observations, and documentation to apparatus government regional, village heads, as well village assistant. Data analysis was carried out through data reduction, data presentation, and data extraction conclusion in a way interactive. Research results show that mechanism supervision Village Fund budget in the District Jagebob walk through four stages main, namely determination standard, measurement implementation, evaluation with compare results to standards and actions corrective. Practice implementation in the field Not yet completely optimal, characterized by non-conformity guidelines with condition real, limitations capacity apparatus, documents that are not incomplete, incomplete evaluation consistent, and action slow and ineffective corrective action always proportional. Supervision supported by clear guidelines, coaching routine and commitment government area, however Still hampered by weak coordination, limited human resources, number of minimal supervision, and conditions difficult geography reachable.

References

Erawati, T., & Abdulhadi, M. F. (2018). Pengaruh Pemahaman Sistem Akuntansi Keuangan Daerah, Kapasitas Sumber Daya Manusia Dan Pemanfaatan Teknologi Informasi Terhadap Kualitas Informasi Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah (Studi Kasus Pada Pemerintah Daerah Kota Yogyakarta). Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Kuangan Akmenika, 15(1), 67–78.

George R. Terry (2005), Principles of Management, Alexander Hamilton Institute, New York.

Grindle, M. S. (1980). Politics and Policy Implementation in the Third World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Grindle, M. S. (1997). Getting Good Government: Capacity Building in the Public Sectors of Developing Countries. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Halim, A. (2016). Manajemen Keuangan Daerah (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Hariandja, M. T. E. (2017). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Grasindo.

Harun. (2011). Keuangan Daerah dan Otonomi Daerah. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Hasibuan, Malayu SP (2005), Manajemen Dasar, Pengertian dan Masalah, C.V. Haji Masanggung, Jakarta.

Hasibuan, R., & Firmansyah, D. (2021). Akuntabilitas dan Transparansi Pengelolaan Keuangan Desa. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Heeks, R. (2002). “Information Systems and Developing Countries: Failure, Success, and Local Improvisations.” The Information Society, 18(2). London, UK: Routledge.

Inspektorat Jenderal Kementerian Dalam Negeri Republik Indonesia. (2020). Pedoman Pengawasan Pengelolaan Dana Desa. Jakarta: Kementerian Dalam Negeri RI.

Kementerian Desa, Pembangunan Daerah Tertinggal, dan Transmigrasi Republik Indonesia. (2018). Laporan Monitoring dan Evaluasi Dana Desa Tahun 2018. Jakarta: Kemendes PDTT RI.

Kementerian Desa, Pembangunan Daerah Tertinggal, dan Transmigrasi. (2020). Modul Pengawasan Dana Desa. Jakarta: Kemendesa PDTT.

Kettl, D. F. (2000). The Global Public Management Revolution. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

Koontz & O’Donnell. (1972). Principles of Management: An Analysis of Managerial Functions. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Kothari, C.R. (2004). Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques, Second Revised Edition. New Delhi: New Age International (P) Ltd., Publishers.

Lembaga Administrasi Negara Republik Indonesia (LAN RI). (2019). Birokrasi dan Administrasi Prosedural di Indonesia. Jakarta: LAN RI.

Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

Manullang. (2008). Konsep Efektivitas Pengelolaan dan Pengawasan Keuangan. Jakarta: Mandar Maju.

Mazmanian, D. A., & Sabatier, P. A. (1983). Implementation and Public Policy. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.

Merriam, S.B. & Caffarella, R.S. (2001). Learning in adulthood: A comprehensive guide. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Mulyadi. 2007. Akuntansi Biaya. Edisi Ke-5. Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN.

Neuman, W. Lawrence, 2000, Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, Allyn and Bacon, Boston

Neuman, W. Laurence. (2006). Metode Penelitian Sosial: Pendekatan Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif. Jakarta: PT. Indeks.

Nurhadi. (2020). Manajemen Pengawasan Dalam Pemerintahan Daerah. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

OECD. (2016). Public Governance Review: Accountability and Trust in Government. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. (1973). Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington Are Dashed in Oakland. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Purbopranoto, Kuntjoro, 1975, Beberapa Catatan Hukum tata Pemerintahan dan Peradilan Administrasi Negara. Penerbit Alumni, Bandung.

Rahajeng, A. (2016). Perencanaan Penganggaran Keuangan Daerah. Yogyakarta: UGM Press.