Charisma and Capitalism in Motion: the Continuing Relevance of Robert P. Weller’s Ideas for Indonesian Islamic Modernity

Authors

  • Roberto Arieza Martin Purba Universitas Islam Gunung Djati Bandung
  • Dody S. Truna Universitas Islam Gunung Djati Bandung
  • Rifki Rosyad Universitas Islam Gunung Djati Bandung

Keywords:

religion and capitalism, global charisma, secularization, moral economy, Asian globalization

Abstract

This study examines Robert P. Weller’s theoretical contributions to understanding the relationship between religious transformation and the capitalist economic system in Asia. Weller challenges the Weberian secularization paradigm by proposing a dialectical model of secularization–religionization and a typology of three religious responses to capitalism: embracing amorality, prosperity theology, and philanthropic amelioration. Through empirical studies in Taiwan, he demonstrates that religion is not a victim of modernity but a moral actor negotiating global economic values. This review evaluates Weller’s theoretical framework, methodological approach, empirical contributions, as well as its limitations and directions for future research.

References

Asad, T. (1993). Genealogies of religion: Discipline and reasons of power in Christianity and Islam. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Berger, P. L. (1999). The desecularization of the world: Resurgent religion and world politics. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing.

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Casanova, J. (1994). Public religions in the modern world. University of Chicago press.

Eisenstadt, S. N. (2000). Multiple modernities. Daedalus, 129(1), 1–29.

Fealy, G., & White, S. (2008). Expressing Islam: Religious life and politics in Indonesia. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Fourcade, M. (2018). Economics: the view from below. Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, 154(1), 5.

Gillespie, T. (2014). The relevance of algorithms. Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society, 167(2014), 167.

Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.

Hefner, R. W. (2000). Civil islam: Muslims and democratization in indonesia. Princeton University Press.

Hoesterey, J. B. (2016). Rebranding Islam: Piety, Prosperity, and a Self-Help Guru. In Piety, Prosperity, and a Self-Help Guru. Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/doi:10.1515/9780804796385

Iannaccone, L. R. (1998). Introduction to the Economics of Religion. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(3), 1465–1495.

Polanyi, K. (1944). The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. In Boston, MA. Beacon Press.

Prior, L. (2003). Using documents in social research. Sage Publications.

Salim, A. (2008). The Shift in Zakat Practice in Indonesia: From Piety to an Islamic Socio-Political-Economic System. Chiang Mai: Silkworm Books.

Slama, M. (2017). A subtle economy of time: Social media and the transformation of Indonesia’s Islamic preacher economy. Economic Anthropology, 4(1), 94–106. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sea2.12075

Stark, R., & Finke, R. (2000). Acts of Faith: explaining the human side of religion. University of California Press.

Weber, M. (1905). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. New York: Charles.

Weller, R. P. (2008). Asia and the global economies of charisma. In Religious Commodifications in Asia (pp. 29–44). Routledge.

Yang, F. (2011). Religion in China: Survival and revival under communist rule. Oxford University Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-07

How to Cite

Roberto Arieza Martin Purba, Dody S. Truna, & Rifki Rosyad. (2026). Charisma and Capitalism in Motion: the Continuing Relevance of Robert P. Weller’s Ideas for Indonesian Islamic Modernity. Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia (JIM-ID), 5(01), 86–93. Retrieved from https://ejournal.seaninstitute.or.id/index.php/esaprom/article/view/7953