Digital Mastery in the Population and Civil Registration Office of Depok City: Toward Government Digital Transformation
Keywords:
Digital Mastery, Digital Population Identity, Digital Transformation.Abstract
Digital transformation in public service delivery has driven the implementation of the Digital Population Identity (Identitas Kependudukan Digital/IKD) as part of the Electronic-Based Government System (Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik/SPBE) to enhance efficiency and integration of population administration based on the National Identification Number (NIK). However, the implementation of IKD at the Department of Population and Civil Registration of Depok City still faces several challenges, including low activation rates, limited public literacy and trust, the proliferation of fraud conducted under the guise of IKD, and the internal readiness of the bureaucracy to manage digital transformation. This study aims to analyze the level of readiness and digital mastery of the Department of Population and Civil Registration of Depok City and to identify strategic aspects that need to be strengthened to support the successful digital transformation of population administration services. The Digital Mastery theory proposed by Westerman, Bonnet, and McAfee (2014) is employed as the primary analytical framework to understand and assess the processes and levels of digital mastery within the research context. The theory emphasizes that successful digital transformation is determined by a balance between digital capabilities and leadership capabilities. The combination of these two dimensions results in four levels of digital mastery, namely Beginners, Fashionistas, Conservatives, and Digital Masters. This study adopts a qualitative descriptive method with an inductive approach. The findings indicate that the digital mastery of the Department of Population and Civil Registration of Depok City in supporting government digital transformation through the activation of Digital Population Identity (IKD) is positioned at the Conservative level within the Digital Mastery framework of Westerman et al. (2014). This level is characterized by the availability of stable, secure, and standardized digital systems and a focus on the use of technology to improve administrative efficiency. Although leadership commitment to digitalization is evident through support for IKD implementation, regulatory compliance, and personal data protection, the utilization of technology and digital leadership remains operational and risk-control oriented. As a result, it has not fully driven service innovation, strategic data utilization, or enhanced user experience. Therefore, advancing digital mastery toward the Digital Master level requires strengthening an integrated digital strategy between central and local governments, developing visionary digital leadership, enhancing the digital competencies and culture of public officials, improving public digital literacy and trust, and fostering sustained synergy with the Directorate General of Population and Civil Registration to promote citizen-oriented digital transformation in population administration services.
References
Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakar ta: Rineka Cipta.
Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (1989). Educational Research: An Introduction
(5th ed.). New York: Longman.
Creswell, J. W. (2011). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W. (2023). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Westerman, G., Bonnet, D., & McAfee,A. (2014). Leading Digital: Turning Technology Into Business Transformation. Harvard Business Review Press.
Hamdi, A. S. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Aplikasi dalam Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.
Kirk, J., & Miller, M. L. (1986). Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Lofland, J., & Lofland, L. H. (1984). Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.
Mariyadi. (2019). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: CV Budi Utama.
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2006). Designing Qualitative Research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Moleong, L. J. (2015). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Edisi Revisi). Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nazir, M. (2011). Metode Penelitian. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Ulber, S. (2012). Metode Penelitian Sosial. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Usman, H., & Purnomo, S. A. (2014). Metodologi Penelitian Sosial. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Westerman, G., Bonnet, D., & Mc.Afee, A. (2014). Leading Digital: Turning Technology Into Business Transformation. Harvard Business Review Press.
Sukarno, A., Pratama, Y., & Wibowo, H. (2021). Identitas kependudukan digital sebagai instrumen strategis digitalisasi layanan publik. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik, 9(2), 112–125.
World Bank. (2018). The State of Identification Systems in Africa: A Synthesis of Country Assessments. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.
Direktorat Jenderal Kependudukan dan Pencatatan Sipil. (2025). Data Konsolidasi Bersih (DKB) Semester I tahun 2025. Kementerian Dalam Negeri Republik Indonesia.
Direktorat Jenderal Kependudukan dan Pencatatan Sipil. (2024). Data Konsolidasi Bersih (DKB) Semester II tahun 2024. Kementerian Dalam Negeri Republik Indonesia.
Kota Depok. (2021). Peraturan Daerah Kota Depok Nomor 9 Tahun 2021 tentang Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Daerah Kota Depok Tahun 2021-2026. https://ppid.depok.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/RPJMD-2021-2026.pdf
Republik Indonesia. (2006). Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2006 tentang Administrasi Kependudukan. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2006 Nomor 124.
Republik Indonesia. (2013). Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2013 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2006 tentang Administrasi Kependudukan. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2013 Nomor 232.
Republik Indonesia. (2022). Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 72 Tahun 2022 tentang Standar dan Spesifikasi Perangkat Keras, Perangkat Lunak, dan Blangko Kartu Tanda Penduduk Elektronik serta Penyelenggaraan Identitas Kependudukan Digital. Berita Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2022 Nomor 1248.
Dinas Kependudukan Dan Pencatatan Sipil Kota Depok
Dinas Kependudukan dan Pencatatan Sipil Kota Depok Reviews - Penelusuran Google
Disdukcapil Depok (@disdukcapildepok) • Instagram photos and videos
disdukcapil depok - YouTube
Media online/ Kamis, 26 Desember 2024/ https://mediakonsumen.com/2024/12/21/surat-pembaca/penipuan-berkedok-ktp-digital-disdukcapil )
Portal Resmi Pemerintah Kota Depok
SILONDO BERMULA - DUKCAPIL DEPOK











