Organizational Citizenship Behavior in the Educational Context: A Systematic Review of the Role of Work Motivation, Organizational Commitment, Employee Engagement, and Organizational Culture

Authors

  • Yunita Endra Megiati Universitas Pakuan
  • Henny Suharyati Universitas Pakuan

Keywords:

Organizational Citizenship Behavior, Work Motivation, Organizational Commitment, Employee Engagement, Organizational Culture, Education, Systematic Literature Review

Abstract

Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) plays a crucial role in enhancing the effectiveness of educational institutions, yet its determinants remain fragmented across the literature. This study aims to systematically synthesize the role of work motivation, organizational commitment, employee engagement, and organizational culture in shaping OCB among educators. A Systematic Literature Review approach was employed using the PRISMA protocol to ensure a transparent and rigorous selection process. Relevant literature was obtained from Google Scholar, Scopus, and SINTA databases, focusing on publications within the last decade. A total of seventy-four articles met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed using thematic synthesis. The findings indicate that intrinsic motivation acts as a fundamental internal driver of OCB, while affective commitment strengthens emotional attachment that encourages voluntary extra-role behavior. Employee engagement emerges as the most consistent and dominant predictor, reflecting the role of vigor, dedication, and absorption in translating psychological states into proactive actions. Organizational culture functions as both a direct determinant and a moderating factor that reinforces the influence of individual variables. These results highlight that OCB is shaped by the interaction between psychological and organizational dimensions. The study contributes theoretically by integrating multiple determinants into a unified conceptual framework and offers practical implications for educational institutions in developing strategies to enhance educator performance through strengthening motivation, commitment, engagement, and a supportive organizational culture.

References

D. W. Organ, P. M. Podsakoff, and S. B. MacKenzie, Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature, antecedents, and consequences. Sage publications, 2005.

P. M. Podsakoff, S. B. MacKenzie, J. B. Paine, and D. G. Bachrach, “Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research,” J. Manage., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 513–563, 2000.

A. Somech and I. Ron, “Promoting organizational citizenship behavior in schools: The impact of individual and organizational characteristics,” Educ. Adm. Q., vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 38–66, 2007.

S. Sermantho, A. Aslamiah, and N. Noorhapizah, “Pengaruh Kepemimpinan Instruksional, Iklim Organisasi dan Kepuasan Kerja Terhadap Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) Guru SMA Negeri di Kota Palangka Raya,” JAMP J. Adm. dan Manaj. Pendidik., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 595–615, 2025.

A. Suriansyah, A. Aslamiah, N. Noorhapizah, I. Winardi, and J. Dalle, “The relationship between university autonomy, lecturer empowerment, and organizational citizenship behavior in indonesian universities,” J. Soc. Stud. Educ. Res., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 127–152, 2019.

M. Gagné and E. L. Deci, “Self‐determination theory and work motivation,” J. Organ. Behav., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 331–362, 2005.

J. P. Meyer and N. J. Allen, Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research, and application. Sage publications, 2017.

J. P. Meyer and N. J. Allen, “A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment,” Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 61–89, 1991.

W. B. Schaufeli, M. Salanova, V. González-Romá, and A. B. Bakker, “The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach,” J. Happiness Stud., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 71–92, 2002.

E. H. Schein, Organizational Culture and Leadership. SanFransisco: Jossey Bass, 2010.

D. Denison, “Corporate culture and organizational,” New York Wiley. Dike, P.(2013). impact Work. Divers. Organ. Dobbin, F., Jung, J.(2010). Corp. board Gend. Divers. Stock Perform. competence gap or institutional Invest. bias. NCL Rev, vol. 89, p. 809, 1990.

S. P. Robbins and T. A. Judge, Perilaku Organisasi. Jakarta: Salemba Empat, 2017.

M. J. Page et al., “The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews,” bmj, vol. 372, 2021.

J. Thomas and A. Harden, “Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews,” BMC Med. Res. Methodol., vol. 8, no. 1, p. 45, 2008.

A. B. Bakker and E. Demerouti, “Towards a model of work engagement,” Career Dev. Int., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 209–223, 2008.

E. L. Deci and R. M. Ryan, Handbook of self-determination research. University Rochester Press, 2004.

S. Lathifatunnisa and U. A. Izzati, “Hubungan antara Budaya Organisasi dengan Organizational Citizenship Behavior pada Guru di Yayasan X,” Character J. Penelit. Psikol., vol. 12, no. 01, pp. 404–416, 2025.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-25

How to Cite

Megiati, Y. E., & Suharyati, H. (2026). Organizational Citizenship Behavior in the Educational Context: A Systematic Review of the Role of Work Motivation, Organizational Commitment, Employee Engagement, and Organizational Culture. Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia (JIM-ID), 5(04), 957–969. Retrieved from https://ejournal.seaninstitute.or.id/index.php/esaprom/article/view/8446