Legal Certainty of Drivers' Status for Travel Entrepreneurs from the Perspective of Law Number 13 Of 2003 Concerning Employment
Keywords:
Legal Certainty, Driver Status, Travel Entrepreneurs, Employment LawAbstract
Legal certainty in employment relationships is a foundation used by workers (drivers) and employers aimed at preventing arbitrary actions as well as legal violations. Legal certainty is expressed in the form of agreements as a basis for recognition of the status of workers (drivers); however, in reality, the employment relationship between drivers and travel companies is only based on partnership agreements. In fact, these agreements are used by companies to avoid obligations towards workers under labor law. This practice often causes imbalances, because even though an employment relationship exists with elements of work, orders, and wages, workers do not obtain the normative rights as regulated in labor law. Based on the principle of freedom of contract in Article 1338 of the Civil Code, partnership agreements are valid as long as they do not conflict with laws, morality, and public order. However, when the substance of the legal relationship indicates the fulfillment of the elements of an employment relationship, then that relationship should be subject to labor law provisions. The research method used is normative juridical with a statutory approach and a case study of two decisions of the Industrial Relations Court (PHI) involving PT Niaga Handal Cemerlang or Arnes Shuttle. In both decisions, the panel of judges stated that the relationship between the driver and the company met the elements of an employment relationship, and therefore must comply with labor law provisions. The research results show a legal vacuum in the labor legislation system in Indonesia, especially in providing a clear boundary between partnership relations and employment relations. This vacuum has created room for the practice of disguised employment, which is the concealment of standard employment relationships as non-standard relationships to avoid legal obligations to workers. This will impact legal uncertainty for drivers, who ultimately do not receive legal protection, because certainty and legal protection are obtained when the substance of the agreement regulates such matters. Therefore, it is necessary to establish legal norms that explicitly provide clear and firm boundaries between partnership relations and employment relations. In addition, Indonesia also needs to promptly ratify ILO Recommendation No. 198 of 2006 on Determining Employment Relationships in order to strengthen the national legal framework in protecting workers, as well as to provide legal certainty for workers employed as drivers.
References
Pembentukan Undang-Undang Kemitraan Untuk Pengemudi Ojek Online Kemajuan Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi Telah Merevolusi Berbagai Aspek Kehidupan Termasuk Sektor Transportasi . Salah Satu Inovasi Paling Penting Dalam Beberapa Tahun Terakhir Ad.” jrnal Hukum Statuta 2(3): 164–73. doi:https://doi.org/10.35586/jhs.v2i3.9094.
Asep Rudi Gunawan, Ade Maman Suherman dan Tri Setiady. 2024. “WORKERS WHO ARE REHIRED AFTER 5 YEARS OF CONTRACT.” 5(5): 1–19.
Ayu, Nyi Marwa, Haibah. 2025. “PERJANJIAN KEMITRAAN DIHUBUNGKAN DENGAN PASAL 1338 KUH PERDATA DAN UNDANG- LEGAL PROTECTION FOR WORKERS ENGAGED IN PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENTS : A STUDY IN RELATION TO ARTICLE 1338 OF THE INDONESIAN CIVIL CODE.” universitas Langlang buana.
FATIMAH, SITI. 2019. “PENGATAR TRANSFORTASI.” In ponorogo: Myria Publisher, 108. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=PEnCDwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&hl=id#v=onepage&q&f=false.
Firmandani, Iqbal Hastri, S- Jurusan Pendidikan Sejarah, and Fakultas Ilmu. 2021. “PERKEMBANGAN TRANSPORTASI DARAT ( BUS ) DI PROBOLINGGO TAHUN 1933-1956.” 11(3).
Halilah, Siti, and Fakhrurrahman Arif. 2021. “ASAS KEPASTIAN HUKUM MENURUT PARA AHLI.” Siyasah 4(Desember): 56–65. https://ejournal.an-nadwah.ac.id/index.php/Siyasah/about.
Indonesia, Pemerintah Pusat. 2003. Undang-Undang (UU) Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 Tentang Ketenagakerjaan. Indonesia: LN.2003/NO.39, TLN NO.4279, LL SETNEG :79 HLM. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/43013.
International Labour Organization. 2016. NON-STANDARD EMPLOYMENT AROUND THE WORLD. geneva: International Labour Organization. https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/wcmsp5/groups/public/%40dgreports/%40dcomm/%40publ/documents/publication/wcms_534326.pdf.
Izzati, Nabiyla Risfa. 2020. “PENERAPAN DOKTRIN PENYALAHGUNAAN KEADAAN ( UNDUE INFLUENCE ) SEBAGAI ALASAN PEMBATALAN PERJANJIAN KERJA.” Masalah-Masalah Hukum 49(2): 12. https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/mmh/article/view/26411.
Jatimulya, Richard, and Alam Wibowo. 2023. “Urgensi Pembaharuan Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Indonesia Untuk Mengakomodasi Perlindungan Hubungan Kemitraan.” Ketenagakerjaan (J-naker/The Indonesian Journal of Manpower) 18(2). doi:10.47198/naker.v18i2.211.
KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PERDATA.
Kosasih, Johannes Ibrahim. 2019. “Kausa Yang Halal Dan Kedudukan Bahasa Indonesia Dalam Hukum Perjanjian.” In Sinar Grafika, 226.
Noho, Muhammad Dzikirullah H, Embun Sari, Norma Fitria, and Fahd Akbar. 2023. “Pengaktualisasian Itikad Baik Dalam Mencapai Hukum Kontrak Yang Progresif Di Indonesia.” Progressive Law and Society 1(2): 1–9. https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/pls/article/view/22898.
Nurcahyo, Ngabidin. 2021. “Perlindungan Hukum Tenaga Kerja Berdasarkan Peraturan Perundang- Undangan Di Indonesia.” (24): 69–78. doi:10.26905/idjch.v12i1.5781.Abstrak.
Prayitno, Sugeng, Djuhaendah Hasan, and T Subarsyah. 2022. “Industrial Relations Dispute Settlement at the Industrial Relations Court ( PHI ) in Indonesia and the Application of Procedural Law.” 16(1): 50–61. https://www.ijicc.net/images/Vol_16/Iss1/16106_Prayitno_2022_E_R.pdf.
Sugeng Prayitno 1, Wawan Kurniawan 2. 2024. “COLLECTIVE WORKING AGREEMENTS (CLA) IN A JURIDICAL AND PRACTICAL.” Pasundan International of Community Services Journal (PICS-J) 06(01): 10–20. https://garuda.kemdiktisaintek.go.id/documents/detail/5504487.











