Evaluation of the Family Hope Program (PKH) in Agats District, Asmat Regency

Authors

  • Siti Maimuna Tuduho Universitas Musamus, Indonesia
  • Nur Jalal Universitas Musamus, Indonesia
  • Fitriani Fitriani Universitas Musamus, Indonesia

Keywords:

Family Hope Program, Policy evaluation, Poverty, Social protection, Agats District

Abstract

The Family Hope Program (PKH) is a conditional cash assistance-based social protection policy aimed at reducing poverty and increasing access for poor families to education, health, and social welfare services. This study aims to evaluate the implementation of PKH in Agats District, Asmat Regency, and identify factors influencing its implementation. The study used a descriptive qualitative approach with data collection techniques through interviews, observation, and documentation. Research informants included the district head, PKH coordinator, PKH facilitator, and beneficiary families. Data were analyzed through data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing, while program evaluation used William N. Dunn's six criteria, namely effectiveness, efficiency, adequacy, equity, responsiveness, and accuracy. The results show that PKH in Agats District has contributed positively to meeting the basic needs of KPM, especially in the aspects of education, maternal health, and economic support for the elderly. However, program implementation has not been fully optimal due to still facing problems with data synchronization between DTKS, Dukcapil, and Dapodik, delays in aid disbursement, limited facilitators, geographical barriers, and low understanding of some communities regarding the program mechanism. This study recommends continuous data updating, capacity building of facilitators, strengthening of cross-institutional coordination, and socio-cultural approaches to ensure more targeted implementation of PKH in remote areas.

References

N. Cahyadi, R. Hanna, B. A. Olken, R. A. Prima, E. Satriawan, and E. Syamsulhakim, “Cumulative impacts of conditional cash transfer programs: Experimental evidence from Indonesia,” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 88–110, 2020, doi: 10.1257/pol.20190245.

Ministry of Social Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia, Guidelines for the Implementation of the Family Hope Program in 2021. Jakarta: Ministry of Social Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia, 2021.

W. N. Dunn, Public Policy Analysis: An Integrated Approach, 6th ed. New York: Routledge, 2018, doi: 10.4324/9781315181226.

F. Bastagli, J. Hagen-Zanker, L. Harman, V. Barca, G. Sturge, and T. Schmidt, “The impact of cash transfers: A review of the evidence from low- and middle-income countries,” Journal of Social Policy, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 569–594, 2019, doi: 10.1017/S0047279418000715.

R. F. Nurkhalim, I. Susilowati, and K. D. Jayanti, “Program Keluarga Harapan: A conditional cash transfer to increase prenatal visits and birth weight,” Journal of Public Health in Africa, vol. 13, 2022, doi: 10.4081/jphia.2022.1271.

N. A. Maizunati and E. Sulistyaningrum, “Impact evaluation of Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH): Indonesia conditional cash transfer program on iron supplements consumption on pregnant women in Indonesia,” in Proc. ICAS 2019, pp. 35–41, 2019, doi: 10.2991/icas-19.2019.8.

M. Lagarde, A. Haines, and N. Palmer, “Conditional cash transfers for improving uptake of health interventions in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review,” JAMA, vol. 298, no. 16, pp. 1900–1910, 2007, doi: 10.1001/jama.298.16.1900.

N. Kabeer and H. Waddington, “Economic impacts of conditional cash transfer programmes: A systematic review and meta-analysis,” Journal of Development Effectiveness, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 290–303, 2015, doi: 10.1080/19439342.2015.1068833.

V. Shah, J. Hatamyar, T. Hidayat, and N. Kreif, “Exploring the heterogeneous impacts of Indonesia’s conditional cash transfer scheme (PKH) on maternal health care utilisation using instrumental causal forests,” Empirical Economics, vol. 70, pp. 1–33, 2026, doi: 10.1007/s00181-025-02846-6.

S. Garcia and J. E. Saavedra, “Educational impacts and cost-effectiveness of conditional cash transfer programs in developing countries: A meta-analysis,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 87, no. 5, pp. 921–965, 2017, doi: 10.3102/0034654317723008.

T. M. Millán, T. Barham, K. Macours, J. A. Maluccio, and M. Stampini, “Long-term impacts of conditional cash transfers: Review of the evidence,” The World Bank Research Observer, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 119–159, 2019, doi: 10.1093/wbro/lky005.

E. Owusu-Addo, A. M. N. Renzaho, and B. J. Smith, “Cash transfers and the social determinants of health: A conceptual framework,” Health Promotion International, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. e106–e118, 2019, doi: 10.1093/heapro/day079.

M. M. Gaarder, A. Glassman, and J. E. Todd, “Conditional cash transfers and health: Unpacking the causal chain,” Journal of Development Effectiveness, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 6–50, 2010, doi: 10.1080/19439341003646188.

J. E. Cooper, T. Benmarhnia, A. Koski, and N. B. King, “Cash transfer programs have differential effects on health: A review of the literature from low and middle-income countries,” Social Science & Medicine, vol. 247, p. 112806, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112806.

R. de Groot, T. Palermo, L. M. Banks, and H. Kuper, “The impact of the Lesotho Child Grant Programme in the lives of children and adults with disabilities: Disaggregated analysis of a community randomized controlled trial,” International Social Security Review, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 55–81, 2021, doi: 10.1111/issr.12265.

M. B. Miles, A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldana, Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2014.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-19

How to Cite

Tuduho, S. M., Jalal, N., & Fitriani, F. (2026). Evaluation of the Family Hope Program (PKH) in Agats District, Asmat Regency. Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia (JIM-ID), 5(05), 1044–1049. Retrieved from https://ejournal.seaninstitute.or.id/index.php/esaprom/article/view/8512