Employee Performance in the Utilization of E-Office at the Directorate General of Regional Autonomy, Ministry of Home Affairs
Keywords:
Employee Performance, E-Office Utilization, Directorate General of Regional Autonomy, Ministry of Home Affairs.Abstract
This study aims to analyze employee performance in the implementation of the E-Office system at the Directorate General of Regional Autonomy (Ditjen Otda), Ministry of Home Affairs. Along with the rapid development of information technology, the implementation of E-Office in government institutions is expected to improve employee performance by providing more efficient, effective, and transparent administrative services. However, the adoption of this technology also requires employees to adapt and change their work behavior in carrying out their duties. This research employed a descriptive method with a quantitative approach. Data were collected through a survey involving employees of the Directorate General of Regional Autonomy using a questionnaire designed to measure performance aspects affected by the use of E-Office, including productivity, service quality, and employee satisfaction with the implemented system. Data analysis was conducted using descriptive statistical techniques to describe the extent to which the implementation of E-Office influences employee performance. The results indicate that the implementation of E-Office has indirectly transformed the work structure and organizational culture of employees at the Directorate General of Regional Autonomy, thereby making a significant contribution to employee performance, particularly in accelerating administrative processes. However, its utilization is still considered suboptimal, and improvements are needed in terms of employee mindset transformation and system enhancement, such as reducing paper usage, improving accessibility to information, and increasing socialization efforts. In addition, several challenges remain, including limited technological infrastructure and insufficient socialization and training for some employees, which affect the optimization of E-Office system utilization. This study concludes that although the utilization of E-Office at the Directorate General of Regional Autonomy has contributed to improving employee performance, further efforts are still required in the areas of training, infrastructure development, and increased socialization to ensure the optimal use of the system.
References
Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., Berg, P., & Kalleberg, A. L. (2000). Manufacturing Advantage: Why High-Performance Work Systems Pay Off. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.
Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt, J. V. (2015). The New Public Service: Serving, Not Steering. Routledge.
Gibson, J. L., Ivancevich, J. M., Donnelly, J. H., & Konopaske, R. (2012). Organizations: Behavior, Structure, Processes. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Henry, N. (2018). Public administration and public affairs. Routledge.
Indrajit, R. E. (2005). Electronic Government: Strategi Pembangunan dan Pengembangan Sistem Pelayanan Publik Berbasis Teknologi Digital. Jakarta: Andi Publisher.
Jogiyanto, H.M. (2005). Sistem Teknologi Informasi. Yogyakarta: Andi.
Kasmir. (2015). Manajemen Sumberdaya Manusia (Teori dan Praktik).
Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Laudon, K.C., & Laudon, J.P. (2006). Management Information Systems: Managing the Digital Firm (10th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education.
Layne, K., & Lee, J. (2001). Developing Fully Functional E-Government: A Four Stage Model. Government Information Quarterly.
Mangkunegara, A. A. A. P. (2013). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Perusahaan. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mardiasmo. (2011). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: Andi.
Suharno. (2008). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Medan: Universitas Medan Area.
Moleong, L.J. (2013).Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Edisi Revisi, Bandung: Remaja Resdakarya.
Mulyani, S. (2016). Manajemen Sistem Informasi Perkantoran Elektronik. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Mathis, R. L., & Jackson, J. H. (2006). Human Resource Management. Mason: Thomson South-Western.
Robbins, S. P., & Coulter, M. (2012). Management. New Jersey: Pearson
Prentice Hall.
Rosenbloom, D. H., Kravchuk, R. S., & Clerkin, R. M. (2015). Public Administration: Understanding Management, Politics, and Law in the Public Sector. McGraw-Hill Education.
Riley, T. B. (2003). E-Governance to E-Democracy: Examining the Evolution. Commonwealth Centre for Electronic Governance.
Riniwati, H., & Sari, I.A. (2015). Pengaruh Kompetensi dan Motivasi terhadap
Kinerja Karyawan pada PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk. Cabang Jember.
Sedarmayanti. (2009). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Reformasi Birokrasi, dan Manajemen Pegawai Negeri Sipil. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Sugiyono.(2017). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan R&D, Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sutabri, T. (2012). Sistem Informasi Manajemen. Jakarta: Andi Publisher.
Steers, Richard M. (2015) Efektifitas Organisasi. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Siagian, Sondang P. (2016). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Edisi Pertama, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Siswanto, B. (2003). Pengantar Manajemen. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara.
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sutabri, T. (2005). Sistem Informasi Manajemen. Yogyakarta: Andi.
Tadjudin, M. (2019). Transformasi Digital dalam Administrasi Perkantoran. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.
Turban, E., McLean, E., & Wetherbe, J. (2002). Information Technology for Management: Improving Quality and Productivity. New York: Wiley.
Wibowo. (2011). Manajemen Kinerja. Jakarta : Rajawali Pers.Sedarmayanti. (2017). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia: Reformasi Birokrasi dan Manajemen Pegawai Negeri Sipil. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
ECSOFIM (Ekonomi and Social of Fisheries and Marine Journal, 3. (Google Scholar).
The World Bank. (2004). E-Government Overview. Retrieved from www.worldbank.org
UNESCO. (2005). E-Government Toolkit for Developing Countries. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
https://spbe.co.id/tag/indeks-spbe.
https://www.menpan.go.id/site/download/file/6794-3-buku-laporan-pelaksanaan-evaluasi-spbe-tahun-2020.
Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara.
Peraturan Presiden No. 81 Tahun 2010 tentang Grand Design Reformasi Birokrasi 2010 – 2025.
Peraturan presiden Nomor 95 Tahun 2018 tentang Sistem Pemerintah Berbasis Elektronik (SPBE).
Inpres Nomor 3 Tahun 2003 tentang Elektronik Government atau E-Government,
Peraturan Dalam Negeri Nomor 77 Tahun 2020 tentang Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik (SPBE).
Peraturan Dalam Negeri Nomor 9 Tahun 2025 tentang Organisasi dan tata kerja Kemendagri.
Keputusan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 555-4716 Tahun 2021 tentang pelaksanaan Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik di Kementerian Dalam Negeri.
