Efficacy of Local Anesthetic: A Narrative Literature Review and Clinical Update in Dentistry

Authors

  • Faisal Kuswandani Universitas Padjadjaran
  • Felisha Febriane Balafif Universitas Padjadjaran
  • Nuroh Najmi Universitas Padjadjaran
  • Anggun Rafisa Universitas Padjadjaran

Keywords:

Local anesthetic, Dentistry, Articaine, Lidocaine, Mepivacaine

Abstract

Achieving adequate anesthesia in patients is one of the most important aspects of the practice of dentistry to control or eliminate of pain. Pain is one of the most commonly experienced symptoms in dentistry and is a major concern to the dentist. The most essential skill of all dental practitioners is the ability to provide safe and effective local anesthesia. Several local anesthetics are used by the dentist, lidocaine has been considered as the golden standard for local anesthetic agents in dentistry for years. Articaine and mepivacaine both relatively new anesthetic agents are now widely used too. The purpose of this article is to provide a pharmacological profile of the various local anesthetic formulations in current use and their technical considerations.

Author Biography

Faisal Kuswandani, Universitas Padjadjaran

 

 

References

Katyal V. The efficacy and safety of articaine versus lignocaine in dental treatments: A meta-analysis. J Dent. 2010;38(4):307–17.

Su N, Liu Y, Yang X, Shi Z, Huang Y. Efficacy and safety of mepivacaine compared with lidocaine in local anaesthesia in dentistry: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Int Dent J. 2014;64(2):96–107.

Almeida PC De, Raldi FV, Ricardo F, Sato L, Dias R. Volume and effectiveness assessment of articain 4 % versus mepivacaine 2 % used in third molar surgery : randomized , double-blind , split-mouth controlled clinical trial. 2020;25(6).

Gao X, Meng K. Comparison of articaine , lidocaine and mepivacaine for buccal infiltration after inferior alveolar nerve block in mandibular posterior teeth with irreversible pulpitis. 2020;228(8):605–8.

Malamed SF. Local anesthetics: dentistry’s most important drugs, clinical update 2006. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2006;34(12):971–6.

Cuvillon P, Nouvellon E, Ripart J, Boyer JC, Dehour L, Mahamat A, et al. A comparison of the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of bupivacaine, ropivacaine (with epinephrine) and their equal volume mixtures with lidocaine used for femoral and sciatic nerve blocks: A double-blind randomized study. Anesth Analg. 2009;108(2):641–9.

Malamed SF, Gagnon S, Leblanc D. A comparison between articaine HCl and lidocaine HCl in pediatric dental patients. Pediatr Dent. 2000;22:307–11.

Becker DE, Reed KL. Essentials of local anesthetic pharmacology. Anesth Prog. 2006;53(3):98–108; quiz 109–10.

Malamed SF. Handbook of Local Anesthesia. 7th. Louis S, editor. Mosby; 2020.

Arya V, Arora G, Kumar S, Kaur A, Mishra S. Management of patients with allergy to local anesthetics: two case reports. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2021;21(6):583.

Rang HP, Ritter JM, Flower RJ, Henderson G. Rang and Dale’s Pharmacology. eight edit. China: Elsevier Churcill Livingstone; 2016.

Decloux D, Ouanounou A. Local Anaesthesia in Dentistry: A Review. Int Dent J [Internet]. 2021;71(2):87–95. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/idj.12615

Ouanounou A, Haas DA. Drug therapy during pregnancy: Implications for dental practice. Br Dent J [Internet]. 2016;220(8):413–7. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.299

Neves RS, Neves ILI, Giorgi DMA, Grupi CJ, César LAM, Hueb W, et al. Effects of epinephrine in local dental anesthesia in patients with coronary artery disease. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2007;88(5):545–51.

Haas DA. An Update on Local Anesthetics in Dentistry ( Mise à jour sur les anesthésiques locaux utilisés en dentisterie ). J Can Dent Assoc (Tor). 2002;68(9):546–51.

Vinycomb TI, Sahhar LJ. Comparison of Local Anesthetics for Digital Nerve Blocks: A Systematic Review. J Hand Surg Am. 2014;39(4):744-751.e5.

Best CA, Best AA, Best TJ, Hamilton DA. Buffered lidocaine and bupivacaine mixture - the ideal local anesthetic solution? Plast Surg (Oakville, Ont). 2015;23(2):87–90.

Moore PA, Hersh E V. Local Anesthetics: Pharmacology and Toxicity. Dent Clin North Am. 2010;54(4):587–99.

Martin E. Articaine in dentistry : an overview of the evidence and meta-analysis of the latest randomised controlled trials on articaine safety and ef fi cacy compared to lidocaine for routine dental treatment. BDJ Open [Internet]. 2021;(June):1–13. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41405-021-00082-5

Gazal G, Alharbi AM, Al-Samadani KH, Kanaa MD. Articaine and mepivacaine buccal infiltration in securing mandibular first molar pulp anesthesia following mepivacaine inferior alveolar nerve block: A randomized, double-blind crossover study. Saudi J Anaesth. 2015;9(4):397–403.

Gazal G, Alharbi R, Fareed W, Omar E, Alolayan A, Al-Zoubi H, et al. Comparison of onset anesthesia time and injection discomfort of 4% articaine and 2% mepivacaine during teeth extractions. Saudi J Anaesth. 2017;11(2):152.

Fayans EP, Stuart HR, Carsten D, Ly Q, Kim H. Local Anesthetic Use in the Pregnant and Postpartum Patient. Dent Clin North Am. 2010;54(4):697–713.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-02

How to Cite

Kuswandani, F., Balafif, F. F., Najmi, N., & Rafisa, A. (2023). Efficacy of Local Anesthetic: A Narrative Literature Review and Clinical Update in Dentistry . Jurnal EduHealth, 14(02), 675–682. Retrieved from https://ejournal.seaninstitute.or.id/index.php/healt/article/view/2094

Most read articles by the same author(s)