Differences Of Saliva pH Towards The Compressive Strength Of Bulkfill Composite Resin

Authors

  • Badi Soerachman Bagian Konvervasi Gigi Program Studi Kedokteran Gigi Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani
  • Laeli Sabilah Program Studi Kedokteran Gigi Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani
  • Atia Nurul Sidiqa Bagian Ilmu Teknologi Material Kedokteran Gigi Program Studi Kedokteran Gigi Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani.

Keywords:

Compressive strength, pH, Resin composite bulkfill, Artificial saliva

Abstract

Bulkfill composite resin has special qualities such as can be polymerized to 4 mm depth. One of the mechanical characteristics of bulkfill composite resins is high compressive strength. The compressive strength of restoration material is an indicator of successful restoration in the long-term. One factor that can affect the compressive strength in composite resins is the condition of the oral cavity. The oral cavity condition can be affected by the liquid in the oral cavity such as salivary pH. The compressive strength in composite resins is affected by the degradation process that is caused by changes in salivary pH. The purpose of this study was to find differences in artificial salivary pH toward the compressive strength in bulkfill composite resins. This study was divided into three groups, each group has 9 samples of bulk-filled composite resin in a disk shaped with 4 mm for diameter and 6 mm for the thickness based on ADA specification No.27/1993. All groups were soaked in artificial saliva at pH 4, 7, and 10 for 24 hours, and then the compressive strength was measured using UTM with a load of 250 kgf and speed of 0.5 mm/minute. The results of the tests were analyzed using Anova. Based on it, there is no difference between compressive strength in bulkfill composite resin on the immersion pH of artificial saliva 4, 7, and 10 with p-value of 0.546 (p>0.05). Moreover, there is no difference between the three-action maybe because of filler in bulkfill composite resin has more filler and UDMA rather than conventional composite resin. Therefore

References

Kenneth Anusavice, Chiayi Shen HRR. Phillips’ science of dental materials. 12 Ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier; 2012. 592 p.

Ratih DN, Novitasari A. Kekerasan mikro resin komposit packable dan bulkfill dengan kedalaman kavitas berbeda. MKGI 2017; 3(2): 76–82.

Dhamayanti I, Nugraheni T, Ratih DN. Pengaruh lama penyinaran terhadap kebocoran mikro restorasi resin komposit bulkfill. J Ked Gi 2014; 5(2): 121–9.

Burgess J CD. Comparative properties of low-shrinkage composite resins. Compend Contin Edu Dent 2010; 31(2): 5–10.

Sakaguchi Ronald L., Powers John M. Craig’s restorative dental materials. 13th ed. John M. Powers P, editor. Philadelphia; 2012. 327–347 p.

Pasril Y, Pratama WA. Perbandingan kekuatan tekan resin komposit hybrid menggunakan sinar halogen dan LED. IDJ 2013; 2(2): 83–90.

AL Shaafi MM. Factors affecting polymerization of resin based composites. Saudi J Dent 2017; 29: 48–58.

Andari ES, Wulandari E, Robin DMC. Efek larutan kopi robusta terhadap kekuatan tekan resin komposit nanofiller. Stomatognatic (J Ked Gi Unej) 2014; 11(1): 6–11.

Pribadi N, Soetojo A. Effects of different saliva pH on hybrid composite resin surface roughness. MKGI 2011; 44(2): 63.

Sun G, Margaretta DL. Pengaruh obat kumur mengandung alkohol 9 % Dan non- alkohol terhadap Kekuatan tekan resin komposit bulkfill. JKGT 2019; 1(2):1–4.

Aryanto M, Armilia M, Aripin D. Compressive strength resin komposit hybrid post curing dengan light emitting diode menggunakan tiga ukuran lightbox yang berbeda. MKGI 2013; 46(2): 101–6.

Putriyanti F, Herda E, Soufyan A. Pengaruh saliva buatan terhadap diametral tensile strength micro fine hybrid Resin composite yang direndam dalam minuman isotonic 2012; 61(1): 43–8.

Susiani D. Pengaruh perendaman resin komposit nano hybrid dalam minuman isotonik terhadap kekuatan tekan. J Wiyata 2015; 2(2): 176–80.

Nurmalasari, A. Perbedaan kekasaran permukaan resin komposit nano pada perendaman teh hitam dan kopi. J Wiyata 2015; 2(1).

Dentsply. Scientific compendium smart dentin replacement. 2011.

Basri MHC, Erlita Isyana, Nahzi MYI. Kekasaran permukaan resin komposit nanofiller setelah perendaman dalam air sungai dan air PDAM. Dentino J Ked Gi. 2017; 1(2): 101-106.

Afrianti N, Erlita I, Adhani R. Isotonic beverage effect on surface hardness of

bulkfill type composite resin. Dentino J Ked Gi 2019; IV(2): 130–4.

Handayani DP, Puspitasari D, Dewi N. Efek perendaman rebusan daun sirih merah (Piper crocatum) terhadap kekerasan permukaan resin komposit. MKGI 2016; 2(2): 60–5.

Sidiqa AN, Soerachman B. Pengaruh penyinaran QTH dan LED pada kekuatan tekan resin komposit bulkfill dengan berbagai ketebalan. JMKG 2017; 6(1): 7– 13.

Downloads

Published

2022-07-09

How to Cite

Badi Soerachman, Laeli Sabilah, & Atia Nurul Sidiqa. (2022). Differences Of Saliva pH Towards The Compressive Strength Of Bulkfill Composite Resin. Jurnal EduHealth, 13(01), 43–48. Retrieved from https://ejournal.seaninstitute.or.id/index.php/healt/article/view/290