GRATIFICATION OF PHARMACY COMPANIES AGAINST DOCTORS IN MEDICAL SERVICES IN HOSPITAL

Erika Lismayani; Amelia Rachman; Candra Kusuma Negara

Authors

Erika Lismayani Univ. Cahaya Bangsa
Amelia Rachman Univ. Cahaya Bangsa
Candra Kusuma Negara Univ. Cahaya Bangsa

Keywords:

Gratification, Pharmaceutical Companies, Doctors, Hospitals.

Abstract

Every industry in today's world, including the medical and health sectors, offers rapid gratification. The existence of retaliation by pharmaceutical companies against doctors, particularly when the pharmaceutical company colludes with doctors to promote drugs by paying them commissions or incentives for each prescription they write for patients when there is a mutually agreed-upon arrangement between the two parties. The conspiracy idea comes from the doctor's request and the pharmaceutical industry. This is also a result of monopolistic practices between pharmaceutical companies and doctors, which cause the price of drugs that patients must purchase to become uncontrollably expensive and raises concerns about the quality of the medications for the patient's recovery because of the doctor's financial incentives to see that the drug is quickly sold/sold on the market. The approach of this study is a type of normative juridical research that employs literature sources, pertinent laws and regulations, other media materials, and interviews to collect information or theories regarding the outcome of the research issue. Pharmacies exert influence by giving something to doctors who work for the government to keep them from losing their freedom and independence when prescribing pharmaceuticals to patients. Doctors routinely recommend pharmaceutical companies' prescriptions because they find it rewarding; as a result, the cost of pharmaceuticals rises, monopolies form, and consumer protection is necessary. It can be considered a crime of gratification for the doctor, which is prohibited under Criminal Code Article 12B.

References

AN DP. Tinjauan Yuridis Mengenai Gratifikasi Berdasarkan Uu No. 31 Tahun 1999 Jo Uu No. 20 Tahun 2001 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. 2005;(31):1–17.

Mulyono A, Monokwari DS. Pengaruh Aspek Kultur Hukum Terhadap Perkembangan Tindak Pidana Gratifikasi di Indonesia (Perspektif Penegakan Hukum Pidana). J Jurisprud [Internet]. 2016;3:12–35. Available from: http://journal.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/Jurisprudentie/article/view/2604

Husin A, Rifai E, Rosidah N. Kriminalisasi Gratifikasi. 2014;1(2):1–23.

Andiko T. Sanksi bagi Pemberi dan Penerima Gratifikasi Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam. J QIYAS. 2016;1(1):117–32.

N. Astuti, R. wati, C. K. Negara, and N. Jannah, “SBAR COMMUNICATION IMPLICATIONS FOR COVID-19 PATIENT SATISFACTION”, Journal of Health Informatics Management, Education, and Law, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 12-16, Jun. 2021.

Fadhly W. HARMONISASI HUKUM PENGATURAN SISTEM GRATIFIKASI PADA UNDANG- UNDANG TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DENGAN UNDANG-UNDANG CIPTA KERJA BERDASARKAN KAIDAH OMNIBUS LAW. 2021;4(1):103–13.

Kamali A, Moudi E. Unusual presentation of an abdominal foreign body: A case report. Case J Intern Med. 2017;8(2):126–8.

Wyler von Ballmoos MC, Almassi GH. Commentary: Delayed gratification and optimism bias: Navigating quality and quantity of life with revascularization in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021;161(3):1032–3.

Jawad MSM. Gratification Assessment Utilizing the Time Up and Go Test in Lumbar Discectomy Patients. 2020;19(2).

Tanwiriah, N. R. Yanti, and C. K. Negara, “IMPROVING INPATIENT SAFETY WITH ROLE MODEL DEVELOPMENT”, Jurnal EduHealth, vol. 13, no. 01, pp. 165–172, Aug. 2021.

U. Effendi, A. Basid, and C. K. Negara, “NURSING QUALITY AUDIT MODEL AT SULTAN AGUNG HOSPITAL BANJARBARU”, Jurnal EduHealth, vol. 13, no. 01, pp. 173–186, Aug. 2021.

Rehman A, Jinnah F. Nurses' Care , Doctors' Cure And Patients' Gratification : Therapeutic Relationships In Medicalized Motherhood Practices In Hospitals. 2021;58:158–70.

Hasibuan F. Sanksi Pelaku Gratifikasi Seksual Dalam Undang-Undang Tipikor dan Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam. Al-Qanun J Kaji Sos dan Huk Islam [Internet]. 2021;2(1):96–108. Available from: http://jurnal.uinsu.ac.id/index.php/alqanun/article/view/9080.

Yanti, Noor Ridha, and Candra Kusuma Negara. "Improving Inpatient Safety With Role Model Development." Jurnal EduHealth 13.01 (2022): 165-172.

Frido S. WEWENANG KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI DALAM PENYIDIKAN TINDAK PIDANA GRATIFIKASI BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 30 TAHUN 20021 Oleh: 2019;VIII(9):5–12.

Sunarto. PENEGAKAN HUKUM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI YANG BERUPA PENERIMAAN GRATIFIKASI SEBAGAI SUAP. 2017;15(01):94–101.

Fry Anditya Rahayu Putri Rusadi, Sukinta BDB. PENETAPAN GRATIFIKASI SEBAGAI TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DAN PEMBUKTIANNYA DALAM PROSES PERADILAN PIDANA Fry. 2019;8:1145–65.

Cookson MD, Stirk PMR. GRATIFIKASI PELAYANAN SEBAGAI TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI. 2019;1–26.