Prediction Model of Major Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Based on Clinical Characteristics, Electrocardiographic Findings, and Biomarkers

Authors

  • Adam Rizky Mildsi Fakultas Kedokteran, Program Studi S1 Kedokteran, Departemen Penyakit Jantung dan Pembuluh Darah, Universitas Sumatera Utara,

Keywords:

Acute Myocardial Infarction, Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE), Haji Adam Malik General Hospital, Prediction Model, Biomarkers, Electrocardiography

Abstract

Background: Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) is a life-threatening medical emergency and remains one of the leading causes of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality worldwide, including in Indonesia. As the main referral center in Northern Sumatra, Haji Adam Malik General Hospital, Medan, manages a substantial number of AMI cases, where survivors of the initial event remain at high risk for developing Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE). This study aimed to develop a 30-day MACE prediction model by integrating clinical characteristics, electrocardiographic findings, and cardiac biomarkers among AMI patients treated at Haji Adam Malik General Hospital. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving 450 AMI patients admitted to the Cardiovascular Care Unit (CVCU) of Haji Adam Malik General Hospital, Medan, between January 2023 and December 2024. Variables analyzed included clinical parameters (Killip class, blood pressure, and age), electrocardiographic findings (location of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and bundle branch block), and cardiac biomarkers (high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T [hs-cTnT] and N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide [NT-proBNP]). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to develop the prediction model, and its discriminatory performance was assessed using the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC). Results: Thirty-day MACE occurred in 85 patients (18.8%). Multivariate analysis identified five independent predictors of MACE: age >65 years (OR = 2.1), Killip class >II (OR = 3.5), anterior STEMI (OR = 2.4), hs-cTnT level >1000 ng/L (OR = 2.8), and NT-proBNP level >2000 pg/mL (OR = 3.1). The prediction model incorporating these five variables demonstrated excellent discriminatory performance, with an AUC of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.82–0.90). Conclusion: The integration of clinical characteristics, electrocardiographic findings, and dual biomarkers (hs-cTnT and NT-proBNP) provides an accurate prediction model for 30-day MACE in AMI patients treated at Haji Adam Malik General Hospital, Medan. This model may serve as a practical tool for emergency department triage and risk stratification, particularly for referral patients who frequently present late after symptom onset.

References

. World Health Organization, Cardiovascular Diseases (CVDs). Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2024.

. Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia Health Profile 2023. Jakarta, Indonesia: Ministry of Health, 2024.

. B. Ibanez et al., “2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation,” European Heart Journal, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 119–177, 2018.

. J. P. Collet et al., “2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes,” European Heart Journal, vol. 44, no. 38, pp. 3720–3826, 2023.

. H. Amin, W. Siddiqui, and S. Balla, “Prognostic value of NT-proBNP in acute myocardial infarction patients,” Cardiology Research and Practice, vol. 2021, pp. 1–9, 2021.

. D. A. Morrow et al., “TIMI risk score for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: A convenient, bedside, clinical score for risk assessment at presentation,” Circulation, vol. 102, no. 17, pp. 2031–2037, 2000.

. J. DeGeare et al., “Predictive value of the Killip classification in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction,” American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 87, no. 9, pp. 1035–1038, 2001.

. A. C. Birnbaum and S. G. Drew, “The electrocardiogram in ST elevation acute myocardial infarction: Correlation with coronary anatomy and prognosis,” Postgraduate Medical Journal, vol. 79, no. 935, pp. 490–504, 2003.

. T. Reichlin et al., “Early diagnosis of myocardial infarction with sensitive cardiac troponin assays,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 361, no. 9, pp. 858–867, 2009.

. M. Omland, J. A. de Lemos, and M. S. Sabatine, “A sensitive cardiac troponin T assay in stable coronary artery disease,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 361, no. 26, pp. 2538–2547, 2009.

. D. G. Altman, Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London, U.K.: Chapman & Hall, 1991.

. D. W. Hosmer, S. Lemeshow, and R. X. Sturdivant, Applied Logistic Regression, 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2013.

. T. Fawcett, “An introduction to ROC analysis,” Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 861–874, 2006.

. P. K. Shah et al., “Clinical applications of multivariable risk prediction models in cardiovascular disease,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 76, no. 14, pp. 1693–1708, 2020.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-05

How to Cite

Mildsi, A. R. (2026). Prediction Model of Major Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Based on Clinical Characteristics, Electrocardiographic Findings, and Biomarkers . Jurnal EduHealth, 17(03), 723–729. Retrieved from https://ejournal.seaninstitute.or.id/index.php/healt/article/view/9103