The Influence of Community Participation, Village Government Support, and Member Motivation on the Success of the Karang Taruna Program in Ngorean Village, Gantiwarno, Klaten
Keywords:
Community Participation, Village Government Support, Member Motivation, Program Success, Karang TarunaAbstract
The success of Karang Taruna programs plays an important role in supporting rural development and community empowerment. Program success is influenced by several factors, including community participation, village government support, and member motivation. This study aims to examine the effects of community participation, village government support, and member motivation on the success of the Karang Taruna Program in Ngorean Village. A quantitative approach with a survey method was employed. The study population consisted of members of Karang Taruna in Ngorean Village, while the sample was selected using a simple random sampling technique. Data were collected through questionnaires and analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), including validity and reliability tests, classical assumption tests, multiple linear regression analysis, t-test, F-test, and the coefficient of determination (R²). The findings indicate that community participation, village government support, and member motivation have positive and significant effects on the success of the Karang Taruna Program, both individually and simultaneously. These findings suggest that strengthening community involvement, enhancing institutional support from village governments, and improving member motivation are essential for achieving sustainable and effective youth development programs. The study is expected to provide practical recommendations for village governments and Karang Taruna administrators in improving program implementation and strengthening community-based youth organizations.
Downloads
References
Azmi, A. K., Ikhwan, H., & Listyaningsih, U. (2024). Youth leadership development through the Patriot Desa Program of West Java. Populasi. https://doi.org/10.22146/jp.102693
Cadano, M. J. O. (2023). The reasons of inactive youth engagement in the community: A case study in Barangay District III, Babatngon, Leyte. International Journal of Research Publications. https://doi.org/10.47119/ijrp1001231420234683
Cohen, J. M., & Uphoff, N. T. (1977). Rural development participation: Concepts and measures for project design, implementation and evaluation. Cornell University.
Daudu, S., Okwoche, V. A., & Adegboye, O. (2010). Role of youths in agricultural development in Makurdi Local Government Area of Benue State. Journal of Agricultural Extension, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.4314/jae.v13i2.53906
Dulkiah, M., Simon, J. C., Widoyo, H., Brontowiyono, W., Ruhana, F., & Sacipto, R. (2023). Community participation forms in Indonesian villages to support the Sustainable Development Goals program. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(11), e2061. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i11.2061
Edwards, G. C., III. (1980). Implementing public policy. Congressional Quarterly Press.
Effendy, L., & Haryanto, Y. (2020). Determinant factors of rural youth participation in agricultural development programme at Majalengka District, Indonesia. International Journal of Innovative Research and Development, 9(5). https://doi.org/10.24940/ijird/2020/v9/i5/MAY20074
Firestone, R., Faeamani, G., Okiakama, E., Funaki, T., Henry, A., Prapaveissis, D., Filikitonga, J., Firestone, J., Tiatia-Seath, J., Matheson, A., Brown, B., Schleser, M., Kaholokula, J., Ing, C., Borman, B., & Ellison-Loschmann, L. (2021). Pasifika prediabetes youth empowerment programme: Evaluating a co-designed community-based intervention from a participants’ perspective. Kōtuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online, 16(2), 210–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/1177083X.2021.1876743
Fonseka, R. W. (2018). Empowering youth in rural, up-country Sri Lanka through gender-equitable education and employment. Gender & Development, 26(3), 569–585. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2018.1523288
Kativhu, S., Francis, J., & Khosa, S. (2018). Exploring practical strategies for promoting youth voluntary participation in rural community development: The case of Mutoko District, Zimbabwe. The Anthropologist, 33(1–3), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.31901/24566802.2018/33.1-3.1986
Khin, S. A. (2017). Youth participation in community development: A case study of youth in Takeo Province, Cambodia [Master’s thesis, Victoria University of Wellington]. https://doi.org/10.26686/wgtn.17064563.v1
Mabala, R. (2011). Youth and “the hood” Livelihoods and neighbourhoods. Environment and Urbanization, 23(1), 157–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247810396986
Naaikuur, L. (2025). Leveraging the localization of Sustainable Development Goals through community radio to promote the participation of marginalized citizens in Ghana’s local governance elections. African Quarterly Social Science Review. https://doi.org/10.51867/aqssr.2.3.7
Nugraha, Y. A. (2020). The improvement of tourist-village promotion through the optimization of information and communication technology for rural youth. International Journal of Business, Economics and Social Development, 1(2), 90–98. https://doi.org/10.46336/ijbesd.v1i2.29
OECD. (2021). Applying evaluation criteria thoughtfully. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/543e84ed-en
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2023). Organizational behavior (19th ed.). Pearson.
Robson, J., Wilson, S., Sánchez, C., & Bhatt, A. (2020). Youth and the future of community forestry. Land, 9(11), 406. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9110406
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Zhang, G. (2017). The CIPP evaluation model: How to evaluate for improvement and accountability. Guilford Press.
Sugiyono. (2022). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
