Revealing city identity through a semiotic approach: analysis of city elements
Keywords:
City Identity, Architectural Semiotics, City Elements, Green Open SpaceAbstract
There is generalization and uniformity in the form of development and visuals of the city, so that the city becomes increasingly foreign to society, especially in recognizing and exploring the potential of one's identity to fulfill one's life needs. A city as a complex entity is not only a physical collection of buildings, but also a system of meaning that can be described through a semiotic approach. This research aims to reveal the identity of a city through analyzing city elements using semiotic theory as a basis. A semiotic approach allows us to understand the way symbols and signs within a city contribute to the formation of its identity. The results of this research reveal that city architecture is not just a physical structure, but rather a reflection of the city's identity which is formed through careful planning, taking into account historical, local, rarity, socio-cultural, aesthetic and harmony values. Green and non-green open spaces in urban areas display various forms that reflect social interaction, providing a place for people to communicate, share experiences and build relationships. Apart from its ecological function, open space also has an important role in the social, architectural and economic aspects of cities. Thus, this research highlights the complexity of city elements and symbols in shaping identity as well as the role of open spaces as centers of social interaction, providing insights for holistic and sustainable urban planning.
References
Amin, A., & Graham, S. (1997). The ordinary city. Transactions of the institute of British geographers, 22(4), 411-429.
Avraham, E. (2004). Media strategies for improving an unfavorable city image. Cities, 21(6), 471-479.
Belabas, W., Eshuis, J., & Scholten, P. (2020). Re-imagining the city: Branding migration-related diversity. European Planning Studies, 28(7), 1315-1332.
Boyer, M. C. (1994). The city of collective memory: its historical imagery and architectural entertainments. Mit Press.
Burger, M., & Meijers, E. (2012). Form follows function? Linking morphological and functional polycentricity. Urban studies, 49(5), 1127-1149.
Chizhevsky, A. (2019). 3.2 Sacred Semantics of the Cultural Landscape 3.2. 1 Mythological Archetypes of Developing of the Terrestrial Space. Spaces and Meanings: Semantics of the Cultural Landscape, 8.
Davtalab, J., Deyhimi, S. P., Dessi, V., Hafezi, M. R., & Adib, M. (2020). The impact of green space structure on physiological equivalent temperature index in open space. Urban Climate, 31, 100574.
Dovey, K., Wollan, S., & Woodcock, I. (2012). Placing graffiti: Creating and contesting character in inner-city Melbourne. Journal of urban design, 17(1), 21-41.
Eco, U. (1986). Function and sign: semiotics of architecture. In The city and the sign: An introduction to urban semiotics (pp. 55-86). Columbia University Press.
Friedmann, J. (1999). The city of everyday life: knowledge/power and the problem of representation. disP-The Planning Review, 35(136-137), 4-11.
Gawlikowska, A. P. (2013). From Semantics to Semiotics. communication of architecture. Architecturae et Artibus, 5(1), 51-61.
Gerring, J. (2017). Qualitative methods. Annual review of political science, 20, 15-36.
Haapala, A. (2003). The urban identity: the city as a place to dwell. Place and Location III, 13-24.
Hauge, Å. L. (2007). Identity and place: a critical comparison of three identity theories. Architectural science review, 50(1), 44-51.
Jaworski, A., & Thurlow, C. (2010). Introducing semiotic landscapes. Semiotic landscapes: Language, image, space, 1, 40.
Kavaratzis, M. (2004). From city marketing to city branding: Towards a theoretical framework for developing city brands. Place branding, 1, 58-73.
Kiroff, L. (2002). Visual language in architectural design (Master's thesis).
Krase, J. (2016). Seeing cities change: Local culture and class. Routledge.
Krzyżanowska, N. (2016). The discourse of counter-monuments: semiotics of material commemoration in contemporary urban spaces. Social semiotics, 26(5), 465-485.
Liu, Y., & Chen, C. (2007). The effects of festivals and special events on city image design. Frontiers of Architecture and Civil Engineering in China, 1, 255-259.
Lochtefeld, J. (2010). God's gateway: Identity and meaning in a Hindu pilgrimage place. Oxford University Press.
Mitchell, W. J. (2005). Placing words: Symbols, space, and the city. MIT press.
Montgomery, J. (1998). Making a city: Urbanity, vitality and urban design. Journal of urban design, 3(1), 93-116.
Muktiono, A. (2018). Constructing the Essence of City Element in Gaining A Self-Identified City Branding in Quest of Attracting Tourist Visits. Prosiding Semnasfi, 1(1), 38-45.
Nas, P. J. (2011). Cities full of symbols: a theory of urban space and culture (p. 304). Leiden University Press.
Papen, U. (2015). Signs in cities: The discursive production and commodification of urban spaces. Sociolinguistic Studies, 9(1), 1.
Pezzoli, K. (1997). Sustainable development: a transdisciplinary overview of the literature. Journal of Environmental Planning and management, 40(5), 549-574.
Proshansky, H. M. (1978). The city and self-identity. Environment and behavior, 10(2), 147-169.
Ratiu, D. E. (2013). Creative cities and/or sustainable cities: Discourses and practices. City, culture and society, 4(3), 125-135.
Rondinelli, D. A., Johnson Jr, J. H., & Kasarda, J. D. (1998). The changing forces of urban economic development: Globalization and city competitiveness in the 21st century. Cityscape, 71-105.
Serageldin, I., Shluger, E., & Martin-Brown, J. (Eds.). (2001). Historic cities and sacred sites: cultural roots for urban futures. World Bank Publications.
Sklair, L. (2011). Iconic architecture and urban, national, and global identities. Cities and sovereignty: Identity politics in urban spaces, 179-95.
Somov, G. Y. (2001). Semiotics of architecture and architecture of semiotics. Semiotiche Berichte, 1-4.
Stephenson, J. (2008). The Cultural Values Model: An integrated approach to values in landscapes. Landscape and urban planning, 84(2), 127-139.
Thompson, C. W. (2002). Urban open space in the 21st century. Landscape and urban planning, 60(2), 59-72.
Ziyaee, M. (2018). Assessment of urban identity through a matrix of cultural landscapes. Cities, 74, 21-31.
