THE INFLUENCE OF RISK PERCEPTION, RETURN EXPECTATIONS, BEHAVIORAL MOTIVATION AND TECHNOLOGICAL PROGRESS ON INVESTMENT DECISIONS IN ISLAMIC PEER TO PEER FINTECH

Authors

  • Maulana Abdul Malik Tambunan Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Nurbaiti Nurbaiti Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Muhammad Lathief Ilhamy Nasution Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

Keywords:

Perceived Risk (X1), Expected Return (X2), Behavioral Motivation (X3), Technological Progress (X4), Investment Decision (Y)

Abstract

This study aims to determine the extent of the influence of Risk Perception (X1), Return Expectation (X2), Behavioral Motivation (X3), and Technological Progress (X4) on Investment Decisions (Y). This study uses a quantitative approach with sampling using the non-probability sampling method. The type of data used in this study is Primary Data obtained from questionnaires filled out by respondents directly. While secondary data comes from books, journals, research results, practical work reports and is related to the author's research object.  In this study, the population to be taken is investors or lenders who invest in Islamic peer to peer fintech domiciled in North Sumatra in 2022 as many as 430 people with a sample selection using the slovin formula of 81 people.   The analysis tool uses multiple linear regression analysis. The results showed that Risk Perception (X1), Return Expectation (X2), Behavioral Motivation (X3), and Technological Progress (X4) simultaneously influenced the Investment Decision (Y). The coefficient of determination is 0.741. This means that 74.1% of Investment Decisions (Y) are influenced by Risk Perception (X1), Return Expectation (X2), Behavioral Motivation (X3), and Technological Progress (X4) while the remaining 25.9% is influenced by other variables not examined in this study.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. M. Nisa and Amalia Nuril hidayati, “Pengaruh Pengetahuan Investasi, Risiko Investasi, Kemajuan Teknologi dan Motivasi Terhadap Minat Generaresi Z Berinvestasi di Pasar Modal syariah,” Ekon. Keuangan, Investasi dan Syariah, vol. Vol. 4, no. 1, p. p.28, 2022, doi: 10.47065/ekuitas.v4i1.1676.

A. Soemitra, Bank & Lembaga Keuangan Syariah. Prenada Media, 2017.

L. D. Kaja, Y. F. Angi, and C. Tungga, “Pengaruh Ekspektasi Return, Persepsi Risiko, Dan Self Efficacy Terhadap Minat Investasi Saham Pada Mahasiswa Program Studi Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Universitas Nusa Cendana,” Conf. Econ. Bus. Innov., vol. 26, no. 35, p. 1573, 2021.

I. Andriyanto, “Penguatan daya saing usaha mikro kecil menengah melalui e-commerce,” BISNIS J. Bisnis dan Manaj. Islam, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 87–100, 2019.

O. S. Devi, D. A. D. Tamara, and M. U. Mai, “Minat Publik Terhadap Investasi P2P Lending Fintech Syariah di Alami Sharia: Produk, Akad, Imbal Hasil, Tingkat Keberhasilan Bayar,” Indones. J. Econ. Manag., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 409–420, 2022, doi: 10.35313/ijem.v2i2.3695.

M. Ridwan, “Ekonomi: Pengantar Mikro dan Makro Islam,” Bandung: Citapustaka Media, 2013.

N. I. Rahmahafida, “Perlindungan Hukum Pihak Pemberi Pinjaman pada Layanan Pinjaman Pendidikan Berbasis Teknologi Informasi terhadap Risiko Gagal Bayar,” Jurist-Diction, vol. 3, no. 2, p. 541, 2020, doi: 10.20473/jd.v3i2.18203.

A. Nurholiq, O. Saryono, and I. Setiawan, “Analisis Pengendalian Kualitas (Quality Control) Dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Produk,” J. Ekonologi, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 393–399, 2019.

I. Harahap and M. Ridwan, The Handbook Of Islamic Economics. Medan: FEBI UIN-SU Press, 2016.

M. Zelfia, “Pengaruh Pengetahuan, Modal Investasi Awal Dan Persepsi Risiko Terhadap Keputusan Mahasiswa Fakultas Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Islam Untuk Berinvestasi Di IPOT (Studi Pada Galeri Investasi Syariah Fakultas Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Islam UIN Ar-Raniry).” UIN Ar-Raniry, 2022.

M. Zelfia and M. Zulhilmi, “PENGARUH PENGETAHUAN , MODAL INVESTASI AWAL DAN PERSEPSI RISIKO TERHADAP KEPUTUSAN MAHASISWA FAKULTAS EKONOMI DAN BISNIS ISLAM UNTUK BERINVESTASI DI IPOT THE INFLUENCE OF KNOWLEDGE , INITIAL INVESTMENT CAPITAL AND PERCEPTION OF RISK ON THE DECISION OF STU,” vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 136–146.

D. S. Haryani, “Pengaruh Persepsi Risiko Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Online Di Tanjungpinang,” J. Dimens., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 198–209, 2019, doi: 10.33373/dms.v8i2.2155.

Rachi Titi and R. Sari, “Pengaruh Ekspektasi Return, Persepsi Terhadap Resiko, Dan Self Efficacy Terhadap Minat Investasi Saham,” J. Ilmu Ekon. dan Sos., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 6–18, 2021.

I. Fareva, S. Zulaihati, and A. Sumiati, “… Return Dan Persepsi Risiko Terhadap Minat Investasi Investor Mahasiswa Yang Terdaftar Di Galeri Investasi Bursa Efek Indonesia …,” … J. Econ. Bus. …, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 141–150, 2021.

A. Pratama, A. Fauzi, and U. Purwohedi, “… Persepsi Risiko, Ekspektasi Return, Dan Behavioral Motivation Terhadap Keputusan Investasi Mahasiswa Yang Terdaftar Di Galeri …,” Indones. J. Econ. …, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 252–267, 2022.

D. Ayu Wulandari and R. Iramani, “Studi Experienced Regret, Risk Tolerance, Overconfidance Dan Risk Perception Pada Pengambilan Keputusan Investasi,” J. Bus. Bank., vol. 4, no. 1, p. 55, 2014, doi: 10.14414/jbb.v4i1.293.

P. Nabilah, Y. Mhd, and Nurbaiti, “Revolusi Industri 4.0 : Peran Teknologi Dalam Eksistensi Penguasaan Bisnis Dan Implementasinya,” Jpsb, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 91–98, 2021.

S. S. Al-Gahtani and M. King, “Attitudes, satisfaction and usage: factors contributing to each in the acceptance of information technology,” Behav. Inf. Technol., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 277–297, 1999.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-02

How to Cite

Tambunan, M. A. M., Nurbaiti, N., & Nasution, M. L. I. (2023). THE INFLUENCE OF RISK PERCEPTION, RETURN EXPECTATIONS, BEHAVIORAL MOTIVATION AND TECHNOLOGICAL PROGRESS ON INVESTMENT DECISIONS IN ISLAMIC PEER TO PEER FINTECH. Jurnal Ekonomi, 12(02), 1751–1760. Retrieved from https://ejournal.seaninstitute.or.id/index.php/Ekonomi/article/view/2095