Balancing Act: Integrating Qualitative And Quantitative Data Driven For Recruitment And Selection Process
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54209/infosains.v14i02.4545Keywords:
Recruitment, Selection, Qualitative Approach, Quantitative Approach, Hybrid ApproachAbstract
The research in question delves into the intricate realm of recruitment and selection methods, examining the relationship between qualitative and quantitative approaches. It delves into specific scenarios where each method shines, underscoring the importance of flexibility and integration in decision-making processes. Through a thorough examination, the study underscores the advantages of amalgamating qualitative insights with quantitative data to attain a comprehensive candidate evaluation. By addressing biases and subjectivity, this technique seeks to enhance the fairness and efficiency of recruitment and selection procedures. Ultimately, the research contributes to a broader comprehension of how organizations can fine-tune their recruitment strategies to meet the evolving demands of the job market while ensuring impartial and well-informed decision-making.
Downloads
References
Abbas, S. I., Shah, M. H., & Othman, Y. H. (2021). Critical review of recruitment and selection methods: Understanding the current practices. Annals of Contemporary Developments in Management & HR, 3(3), 46–52.
https://doi.org/10.33166/acdmhr.2021.03.005
Abdul Gafoor, S. (2020). Workplace loneliness and employee creativity from a positive perspective. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 9(6), 244–262. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v9i6.911
Aguinis, H., & Vandenberg, R. J. (2019). Organizational research methods yearly update. Organizational Research Methods, 11(1), 3–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428107309301
Albrecht, S. L., Bakker, A. B., Gruman, J. A., Macey, W. H., & Saks, A. M. (2015). Employee engagement, human resource management practices, and competitive advantage. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 2(1), 7–35. https://doi.org/10.1108/joepp-08-2014-0042
Austin, Z., & Sutton, J. (2014). Qualitative research: Getting started. The Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 67(6), 436–440. https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.v67i6.1406
Bansal, P., & Corley, K. (2011). The coming of age for qualitative research: Embracing the diversity of qualitative methods. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 233–237. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.60262792
Bonisteel, I., Shulman, R., Newhook, L. A., Guttmann, A., Smith, S., & Chafe, R. (2021). Reconceptualizing recruitment in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211042493
Boynton, P. M., & Greenhalgh, T. (2004). Selecting, designing, and developing your questionnaire. BMJ, 328(7451), 1312–1315. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7451.1312
Chalikias, M., Kyriakopoulos, G., Skordoulis, M., & Koniordos, M. (2014). Knowledge management for business processes: Employees’ recruitment and human resources’ selection: A combined literature review and a case study. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 466(2), 505–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11854-3_44
Charles, B. K., & Florah, O. M. (2021). A critical review of literature on employment selection tests. Journal of Human Resource and Sustainability Studies, 9(3), 451–469. https://doi.org/10.4236/jhrss.2021.93029
Chungyalpa, W., & Karishma, T. (2016). Best practices and emerging trends in recruitment and selection. Journal of Entrepreneurship & Organization Management, 5(2), 1000173.https://doi.org/10.4172/2169-026x.1000173
Curry, L. A., Nembhard, I. M., & Bradley, E. H. (2017). Qualitative and mixed methods provide unique contributions to outcomes research. Circulation, 119(10), 1442–1452. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.107.742775
Delapenha, C. J., Espinosa, C., Fabre, J., Lemon, P. F., Gibson, N., & Mujtaba, B. G. (2020). The SAS institute’s human resources practices in diversity and inclusion. Journal of Human Resource and Sustainability Studies, 8(3), 249–265. https://doi.org/10.4236/jhrss.2020.83014
Devotta, K., Woodhall-Melnik, J., Pedersen, C., Wendaferew, A., Dowbor, T. P., Guilcher, S. J., Hamilton-Wright, S., Ferentzy, P., Hwang, S. W., & Matheson, F. I. (2016). Enriching qualitative research by engaging peer interviewers: a case study. Qualitative Research, 16(6), 661–680. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794115626244
Dixon-Woods, M., Agarwal, S., Jones, D., Young, B., & Sutton, A. (2005). Synthesizing qualitative and quantitative evidence: A review of possible methods. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 10(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/135581960501000110
Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
Fortunati, L., Taipale, S., & de Luca, F. (2019). Digital generations, but not as we know them. Convergence, 25(1), 95-112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856517692309
Garg, S., Sinha, S., Kar, A. K., & Mani, M. (2021). A review of machine learning applications in human resource management. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 71(5), 1590-1610. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijppm-08-2020-0427
Gordon, E. K. B., Clapp, J. T., Heins, S. J., Gaulton, T. G., Lane‐Fall, M. B., Aysola, J., Baranov, D. Y., & Fleisher, L. A. (2020). The role of the interview in residency selection: A mixed‐methods study. Medical Education, 54(11), 1029–1039. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14248
Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
Hsu, Y.-R., & Leat, M. (2000). A study of HRM and recruitment and selection policies and practices in Taiwan. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 11(2), 413–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/095851900339936.
Huang, W., Yuan, C., & Li, M. (2019). Person–job fit and innovation behavior: Roles of job involvement and career commitment. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(1), Article 1134. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01134
Hunkenschroer, A. L., & Luetge, C. (2022). Ethics of recruiting and selection: A review and research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics, 178(4), 977–1007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05049-6
Jean Lee, S. K. (1992). Quantitative versus qualitative research methods — two approaches to organization studies. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 9(1), 87–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01732039
Jiarakorn, H., Suchiva, S., & Pasipol, S. (2015). Development of recruitment and selection process for assistant teachers using multiple approaches. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191(2015), 783–787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.717
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014
Judge, T. A., Cranny, C. J., Smith, P. C., & Stone, E. F. (1994). Job satisfaction: How people feel about their jobs and how it affects their performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(1), 186. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393502
Kılıçoglu, A. (2018). Qualitative research for educational science researchers: A review of an introduction to qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 23(4). https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2018.3352
Kivunja, C. (2018). Distinguishing between theory, theoretical framework, and conceptual framework: A systematic review of lessons from the field. International Journal of Higher Education, 7(6), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v7n6p44.
Kristensen, G. K., & Ravn, M. N. (2015). The voices heard and the voices silenced: Recruitment processes in qualitative interview studies. Qualitative Research, 15(6), 722–737. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794114567496
LaRose, J. G., Guthrie, K. M., Lanoye, A., Tate, D. F., Robichaud, E., Caccavale, L. J., & Wing, R. R. (2016). A mixed methods approach to improving recruitment and engagement of emerging adults in behavioral weight loss programs. Obesity Science & Practice, 2(4), 341–354. https://doi.org/10.1002/osp4.71
Lievens, F., & M. Harris, M. (2005). Research on internet recruiting and testing: Status and future directions. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 18(1), 131–165. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470013346.ch4
Marie Ryan, A., & Derous, E. (2018). Highlighting tensions in recruitment and selection research and practice. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 24(1), 54–62.https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12129
McKnight, M. A., Plouchard, S., & Bizal, N. (2015). Organizational hiring preferences: Comparison of traditional and non-traditional hiring and recruitment practices.
International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 5(2), 52-59. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijhrs.v5i2.7529
Newington, L., & Metcalfe, A. (2014). Factors influencing recruitment to research: Qualitative study of the experiences and perceptions of research teams. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 14(1), Article 10.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-10
Newton, P., Chandler, V., Morris-Thomson, T., Sayer, J., & Burke, L. (2014). Exploring selection and recruitment processes for newly qualified nurses: a sequential-explanatory mixed-method study. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 71(1), 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12467
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Slate, J. R., Leech, N. L., & Collins, K. M. (2009). Mixed data analysis: Advanced integration techniques. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 3(1), 13–33. https://doi.org/10.5172/mra.455.3.1.13
Paauwe, J. (2020). HRM and performance: Achievements, methodological issues, and prospects. Journal of Management Studies, 46(1), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00809.x
Parvin Eva, T. (2018). Recruitment and selection strategies and practices in the private sector commercial banks of Bangladesh: Evidence from human resource practitioners. European Business & Management, 4(1), 28-38. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ebm.20180401.15
Paudel, R. (2023). Navigating the complexities of qualitative research in built environmental studies: Methodologies, philosophies, and credibility. International Journal of Applied and Scientific Research, 1(4), 381–390. https://doi.org/10.59890/ijasr.v1i4.1058
Paudel, R. (2024). The impact of automation and artificial intelligence (AI) on leadership and the workforce. Indonesian Journal of Banking and Financial Technology, 2(2), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.55927/fintech.v2i2.8904
Paudel, R., & Sherm, A. (2024). Exploring the theoretical landscape: Implications of remote work on employee performance and well-being. Indonesian Journal of Applied and Industrial Sciences (ESA), 3(3), 263–278. https://doi.org/10.55927/esa.v3i3.8954
Plester, B., & Hutchison, A. (2016). Fun times: The relationship between fun and workplace engagement. Employee Relations, 38(3),332–350.
https://doi.org/10.1108/er-03-2014-0027
Ponto, J. (2015). Understanding and evaluating survey research. Journal of the Advanced Practitioner in Oncology, 6(2), 168–171. https://doi.org/10.6004/jadpro.2015.6.2.9
Quick, J., & Hall, S. (2015). Part three: The quantitative approach. Journal of Perioperative Practice, 25(10), 192–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/175045891502501002
Rahman, S. (2020). The advantages and disadvantages of using qualitative and quantitative approaches and methods in language: A literature review. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(1), 102–112.https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v6n1p102
Rozario, S. D., Venkatraman, S., & Abbas, A. (2019). Challenges in recruitment and selection process: An empirical study. Challenges, 10(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/challe10020035
Russell, S., & Brannan, M. J. (2016). Getting the right people on the bus: Recruitment, selection, and integration for the branded organization. European Management Journal, 34(2), 114–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2016.01.001
Schmitz, L. L., McCluney, C. L., Sonnega, A., & Hicken, M. T. (2019). Interpreting subjective and objective measures of job resources: The importance of sociodemographic context. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(17), Article 3058. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16173058
Ulfa, N., & Kurniasih, D. (2023). Merit system: DIA: Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 21(01), 266-282. https://doi.org/10.30996/dia.v21i01.7843
Steckler, A., McLeroy, K. R., Goodman, R. M., Bird, S. T., & McCormick, L. (1992). Toward integrating qualitative and quantitative methods: An introduction. Health Education Quarterly, 19(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019819201900101
van Hooft, E. A. J., Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D., Wanberg, C. R., Kanfer, R., & Basbug, G. (2020). Job search and employment success: A quantitative review and future research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(5), 674- 713. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000675
Waddingham, J. A., Zachary, M. A., & H. Jack Walker. (2022). Burning up on reentry: The effect of entrepreneurial exit in the hiring context. Journal of Management, 50(2), 455–489. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063221117
