Evaluating Mobile Mathematics Learning Application Success Using the DeLone–McLean Information Systems Success Model
Keywords:
Mobile learning, mathematics education, DeLone and McLean model, information systems successAbstract
This study evaluates the success of the Math World mobile mathematics learning application implemented at SKh YKDW Tangerang using the DeLone and McLean Information Systems Success Model. A quantitative descriptive approach was employed involving 25 special education teachers as respondents. Data were collected through a questionnaire measuring six dimensions of information system success: System Quality, Information Quality, Service Quality, System Use, User Satisfaction, and Net Benefits. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics based on percentage scores. The results indicate that the overall success level of the application reached 78.9%, which falls into the Good category. Among the six dimensions, User Satisfaction obtained the highest score (82.9%), followed by Information Quality (82.4%), while System Use recorded the lowest score (74.1%). The findings suggest that teachers perceive the Math World application as easy to use, providing accurate and relevant learning content that supports mathematics instruction for students with intellectual disabilities. However, improvements are still needed in system reliability, technical support responsiveness, and the integration of the application into regular classroom practice to maximize its educational benefits. Overall, the study concludes that Math World is an effective learning application with considerable potential to support inclusive mathematics education.
Downloads
References
D. Chadwick, C. Richards, M. Molin, and I. Strnadová, “Digital inclusion and people with learning disabilities,” British Journal of Learning Disabilities, vol. 51, pp. 119–124, 2023, doi: 10.1111/bld.12530.
I. Fitzpatrick and M. Trninic, “Dismantling barriers to digital inclusion: An online learning model for young people with intellectual disabilities,” British Journal of Learning Disabilities, vol. 51, pp. 205–217, 2023, doi: 10.1111/bld.12494.
M. N. Ayasrah, M. M. Al-Masa’deh, A. H. Al-Rousan, and M. A. S. Khasawneh, “Digital learning for students with disabilities,” World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 43–50, 2023, doi: 10.18844/wjet.v15i1.8203.
C. Hord, “Middle and high school math teaching for students with mild intellectual disability,” Support for Learning, vol. 38, pp. 4–16, 2023, doi: 10.1111/1467-9604.12425.
P. Kaimara, “Digital transformation stands alongside inclusive education: Lessons learned from a project called ‘Waking Up in the Morning’,” Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10758-023-09667-5.
M. Miftahuddin, L. D. Prasojo, and A. Akalili, “The validation of the Information Systems Success Model: LMS integration during Covid-19,” Indonesian Research Journal in Education, vol. 5, no. 2, 2021, doi: 10.22437/irje.v5i2.15300.
Y. Primadasa, R. Kuswandhie, I. Verdian, and A. Shafnur, “Implementation of the D&M IS Success Model for the SIMPEL application,” CogITo Smart Journal, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 207–217, 2023, doi: 10.31154/cogito.v9i1.493.
A. Al-Fraihat, M. Joy, and J. Sinclair, “Evaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 26, pp. 497–525, 2021.
A. Almaiah, A. Al-Khasawneh, and A. Althunibat, “Exploring the critical challenges influencing the adoption of e-learning system during COVID-19 pandemic,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 26, pp. 1135–1155, 2021.
M. M. Alamri, W. H. Watson, and S. Watson, “Learning technology models that support personalization in education: A systematic review,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 27, pp. 1–25, 2022.
S. Bond, V. Bedenlier, V. Marín, and M. Händel, “Emergency remote teaching in higher education: Mapping the first global online semester,” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 18, 2021.
A. Crompton and D. Burke, “Artificial intelligence in higher education: The state of the field,” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 18, 2021.
T. Ahmad, “Student perceptions and learning outcomes of mobile learning applications in mathematics education,” Computers & Education, vol. 174, 2021.
M. Al-Emran and K. Shaalan, “Educational technology acceptance: A systematic review,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 26, pp. 1–27, 2021.
H. A. M. El-Sabagh, “Adaptive e-learning environment based on learning styles and its impact on students’ engagement,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 26, pp. 1–23, 2021.
R. Huang, J. Tlili, and X. Yang, “Handbook on facilitating flexible learning during educational disruption,” Smart Learning Environments, vol. 9, 2022.
S. Martin, M. Diaz, and E. Sancristobal, “New technology trends in education: A review,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 12345–12360, 2022.
G. Yenduri, R. Kaluri, D. S. Rajput, K. Lakshmanna, T. R. Gadekallu, M. Mahmud, and D. J. Brown, “From assistive technologies to metaverse: Technologies in inclusive higher education for students with specific learning difficulties,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, 2023.
L. Marsden, L. Munn, L. Magee, M. Ferrinda, J. St. Pierre, and A. Third, “Inclusive online learning in Australia: Barriers and enablers,” 2023.
A. Kofahi, H. Hassan, and R. Mohamad, “DeLone and McLean information systems success model: A literature review,” International Journal of Business Information Systems, 2025.
