Soil Microbial Diversity across Different Land-Use Types Using a Metagenomic Approach
Keywords:
Metagenomics, Soil Microbial Diversity, Land Use, 16S Rrna, Soil BiodiversityAbstract
The conversion of natural forests into agricultural land and monoculture plantations is a major driver of soil biodiversity loss in tropical regions, including Sumatra. Soil microorganisms are essential for nutrient cycling, organic matter decomposition, and soil fertility, yet their responses to land-use change remain insufficiently understood. This study analyzed the diversity and composition of soil microbial communities across four land-use types: natural forest, secondary forest/agroforestry, oil palm monoculture, and intensive agriculture. A quantitative comparative design was applied using 20 topsoil samples (0–20 cm). Microbial communities were characterized through Illumina-based 16S rRNA gene sequencing, followed by bioinformatic analysis in QIIME2 and statistical evaluation using one-way ANOVA and Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA). Microbial diversity declined significantly with increasing land-use intensity, with the Shannon index decreasing from 6.42 ± 0.21 in natural forest to 4.67 ± 0.19 in intensive agriculture (F = 18.7; *p* < 0.001). Taxa richness also decreased, accompanied by a shift in dominant phyla from Acidobacteria and Chloroflexi to Proteobacteria and Firmicutes. Soil organic carbon and total nitrogen were positively associated with microbial diversity. These findings demonstrate that land-use intensification reduces soil microbial biodiversity and highlight the importance of conserving natural vegetation and promoting agroforestry to sustain soil ecosystem functions.
Downloads
References
L. Philippot, C. Chenu, A. Kappler, M. C. Rillig, and N. Fierer, “The interplay between microbial communities and soil properties,” Nat. Rev. Microbiol., vol. 22, pp. 226–239, 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41579-023-00980-5.
S. Banerjee, F. Walder, L. Buechi, M. Meyer, A. Y. Held, and A. Gattinger, “Agricultural intensification reduces microbial network complexity and the abundance of keystone taxa in roots,” ISME J., vol. 13, pp. 1722–1736, 2019, doi: 10.1038/s41396-019-0383-2.
X. Cao, Q. Cui, D. Li, Y. Liu, K. Liu, and Z. Li, “Characteristics of soil microbial community structure in different land use types of the Huanghe Alluvial Plain,” Microorganisms, vol. 13, no. 2, p. 273, 2025, doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13020273.
Z. Sun et al., “Soil microbial community variation among different land use types in the agro-pastoral ecotone of northern China is likely to be caused by anthropogenic activities,” Front. Microbiol., vol. 15, p. 1390286, 2024, doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1390286.
P. Yang, M. Yuan, and C. Qu, “Metagenomic insight into the soil microbial functions across land uses,” J. Soils Sediments, vol. 24, pp. 3684–3693, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11368-024-03918-3.
Kasmawati and E. S. Nasution, “Environmental Microbiology : Microbes and Their Roles in Ecosystems,” Int. J. Nat. Sci. Stud. Dev., vol. 01, no. 02, pp. 95–102, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.55299/ijoss.v1i2.17.
N. Fierer et al., “Cross-biome metagenomic analyses of soil microbial communities and their functional attributes,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 109, no. 52, pp. 21390–21395, 2012, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1215210110.
N. Fierer, C. L. Lauber, K. S. Ramirez, J. Zaneveld, M. A. Bradford, and R. Knight, “Comparative metagenomic, phylogenetic and physiological analyses of soil microbial communities across nitrogen gradients,” ISME J., vol. 6, pp. 1007–1017, 2012, doi: 10.1038/ismej.2011.159.
D. Berkelmann, D. Schneider, A. Meryandini, and R. Daniel, “Unravelling the effects of tropical land use conversion on the soil microbiome,” Environ. Microbiome, vol. 15, p. 5, 2020, doi: 10.1186/s40793-020-0353-3.
M. Szoboszlay, A. B. Dohrmann, C. Poeplau, A. Don, and C. C. Tebbe, “Impact of land-use change and soil organic carbon quality on microbial diversity in soils across Europe,” FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., vol. 93, p. fix146, 2017, doi: 10.1093/femsec/fix146.
E. Bolyen et al., “Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2,” Nat. Biotechnol., vol. 37, pp. 852–857, 2019, doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9.
B. J. Callahan, P. J. McMurdie, M. J. Rosen, A. W. Han, A. J. A. Johnson, and S. P. Holmes, “DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data,” Nat. Methods, vol. 13, pp. 581–583, 2016, doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3869.
C. Quast, E. Pruesse, P. Yilmaz, J. Gerken, T. Schweer, and P. Yarza, “The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: Improved data processing and web-based tools,” Nucleic Acids Res., vol. 41, pp. D590–D596, 2013, doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1219.
L. Philippot, C. Chenu, A. Kappler, M. C. Rillig, and N. Fierer, “The interplay between microbial communities and soil properties,” Nat. Rev. Microbiol., vol. 22, pp. 226–239, 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41579-023-00980-5.
J. Xing, H. Wang, P. C. Brookes, J. F. Salles, and J. Xu, “Soil pH and microbial diversity constrain the survival of Escherichia coli in soil,” Soil Biol. Biochem., vol. 128, pp. 139–149, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.10.013.
A. Silva-Sánchez, M. Soares, and J. Rousk, “Testing the dependence of microbial growth and carbon use efficiency on nitrogen availability, pH, and organic matter quality,” Soil Biol. Biochem., vol. 134, pp. 25–35, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.03.008.
M. Bahram et al., “Structure and function of the global topsoil microbiome,” Nature, vol. 560, no. 7717, pp. 233–237, 2018, doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0386-6.
C. R. Cornell, Y. Zhang, D. Ning, N. Xiao, P. Wagle, and X. Xiao, “Land use conversion increases network complexity and stability of soil microbial communities in a temperate grassland,” ISME J., vol. 17, pp. 2210–2220, 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41396-023-01521-x.
Q. Zheng et al., “Soil multifunctionality is affected by the soil environment and by microbial community composition and diversity,” Soil Biol. Biochem., vol. 136, p. 107521, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.107521.
